Literature DB >> 2494893

A methodology for targeting hospital cases for quality of care record reviews.

E L Hannan1, H R Bernard, J F O'Donnell, H Kilburn.   

Abstract

We tested the efficacy of selected case characteristics in targeting quality of care problems for medical record review. The case characteristics, all of which apply to patients who die in a hospital, consist primarily of procedures and DRGs (diagnosis-related groups) for which death rarely occurs, and a set of complications of surgical care. All characteristics are obtainable from combinations of the principal and secondary diagnoses and procedures in the case, and are available from discharge abstracts. The presence of a quality of care problem is confirmed through a review of the medical record by a nurse and two or more physicians. A logistic regression model that controls for various patient and hospital variables is used as a measure of each of the proposed case characteristics. The results indicate that most of the characteristics are associated with higher percentages of quality of care problems than cases chosen at random, and that the methodology has promise as a tool for targeting cases for medical record review.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2494893      PMCID: PMC1349969          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.79.4.430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  13 in total

1.  Health care delivery in Maine, III: evaluating the level of hospital performance.

Authors:  J E Wennberg; A Gittelsohn; N Shapiro
Journal:  J Maine Med Assoc       Date:  1975-11

2.  Measuring the quality of medical care. A clinical method.

Authors:  D D Rutstein; W Berenberg; T C Chalmers; C G Child; A P Fishman; E B Perrin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1976-03-11       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Small area variations in health care delivery.

Authors:  J Wennberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-12-14       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Which rate is right?

Authors:  J Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-01-30       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Does practice make perfect? Part II: The relation between volume and outcomes and other hospital characteristics.

Authors:  A B Flood; W R Scott; W Ewy
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Will payment based on diagnosis-related groups control hospital costs?

Authors:  J E Wennberg; K McPherson; P Caper
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-08-02       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality.

Authors:  H S Luft; J P Bunker; A C Enthoven
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1979-12-20       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Physician and hospital factors associated with mortality of surgical patients.

Authors:  J V Kelly; F J Hellinger
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  MEDISGRPS: a clinically based approach to classifying hospital patients at admission.

Authors:  A C Brewster; B G Karlin; L A Hyde; C M Jacobs; R C Bradbury; Y M Chae
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.730

10.  Effects of surgeon volume and hospital volume on quality of care in hospitals.

Authors:  R G Hughes; S S Hunt; H S Luft
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Patient Outcomes Research Teams and the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.

Authors:  M E Salive; J A Mayfield; N W Weissman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Routine data: a resource for clinical audit?

Authors:  M McKee
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1993-06

Review 3.  Identifying complications and low provider adherence to normative practices using administrative data.

Authors:  D H Kuykendall; C M Ashton; M L Johnson; J M Geraci
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Using Medicare claims data to assess provider quality for CABG surgery: does it work well enough?

Authors:  E L Hannan; M J Racz; J G Jollis; E D Peterson
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Assessing quality of care: another step forward.

Authors:  M A Morehead
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Comparing hospitals that perform coronary artery bypass surgery: the effect of outcome measures and data sources.

Authors:  A J Hartz; E M Kuhn
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  The occurrence of adverse events in low-risk non-survivors in pediatric intensive care patients: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Carin W Verlaat; Cynthia van der Starre; Jan A Hazelzet; Dick Tibboel; Johannes van der Hoeven; Joris Lemson; Marieke Zegers
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.183

8.  Postoperative wound dehiscence after laparotomy: a useful healthcare quality indicator? A cohort study based on Norwegian hospital administrative data.

Authors:  Jon Helgeland; Oliver Tomic; Tonya Moen Hansen; Doris Tove Kristoffersen; Sahar Hassani; Anne Karin Lindahl
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.