Literature DB >> 24948841

Optimal sampling ratios in comparative diagnostic trials.

Ting Dong1, Liansheng Larry Tang1, William F Rosenberger1.   

Abstract

A subjective sampling ratio between the case and the control groups is not always an efficient choice to maximize the power or to minimize the total required sample size in comparative diagnostic trials.We derive explicit expressions for an optimal sampling ratio based on a common variance structure shared by several existing summary statistics of the receiver operating characteristic curve. We propose a two-stage procedure to estimate adaptively the optimal ratio without pilot data. We investigate the properties of the proposed method through theoretical proofs, extensive simulation studies and a real example in cancer diagnostic studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Area under the curve; Diagnostic accuracy; Partial area under the curve; Power; Receiver operating characteristic curve; Two-stage design

Year:  2014        PMID: 24948841      PMCID: PMC4060451          DOI: 10.1111/rssc.12043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat        ISSN: 0035-9254            Impact factor:   1.864


  13 in total

Review 1.  Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer.

Authors:  M S Pepe; R Etzioni; Z Feng; J D Potter; M L Thompson; M Thornquist; M Winget; Y Yasui
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-07-18       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Two-stage sample size re-estimation based on a nuisance parameter: a review.

Authors:  Michael A Proschan
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.051

3.  Matching in studies of classification accuracy: implications for analysis, efficiency, and assessment of incremental value.

Authors:  Holly Janes; Margaret S Pepe
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-05-14       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Accuracy of soft-copy digital mammography versus that of screen-film mammography according to digital manufacturer: ACRIN DMIST retrospective multireader study.

Authors:  R Edward Hendrick; Elodia B Cole; Etta D Pisano; Suddhasatta Acharyya; Helga Marques; Michael A Cohen; Roberta A Jong; Gordon E Mawdsley; Kalpana M Kanal; Carl J D'Orsi; Murray Rebner; Constantine Gatsonis
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Nonparametric and semiparametric group sequential methods for comparing accuracy of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Liansheng Tang; Scott S Emerson; Xiao-Hua Zhou
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Sampling variability of nonparametric estimates of the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves: an update.

Authors:  J A Hanley; K O Hajian-Tilaki
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach.

Authors:  E R DeLong; D M DeLong; D L Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Incorporating the time dimension in receiver operating characteristic curves: a case study of prostate cancer.

Authors:  R Etzioni; M Pepe; G Longton; C Hu; G Goodman
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1999 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Group sequential design for comparative diagnostic accuracy studies.

Authors:  Madhu Mazumdar; Aiyi Liu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves and non-normal data: an empirical study.

Authors:  M J Goddard; I Hinberg
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.