Literature DB >> 24948775

Draft Genome Sequence of Enterococcus faecalis MB5259.

Andrey V Karlyshev1, Joris Robyn2, Geertrui Rasschaert2, Marc Heyndrickx.   

Abstract

In this study, we present a draft genome sequence of Enterococcus faecalis MB5259, a promising probiotic strain. The identified differences and common features between this strain and reference strains will assist in better understanding the mechanism of antibacterial action and in developing novel probiotics.
Copyright © 2014 Karlyshev et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 24948775      PMCID: PMC4064040          DOI: 10.1128/genomeA.00634-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Announc


GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Campylobacter jejuni is the major cause of gastrointestinal infections worldwide. One promising intervention strategy to combat the disease caused by this pathogen is the development of antibacterials based on probiotics. Our previous large-scale screening involving 1,250 bacterial strains identified a particular strain of Enterococcus faecalis, MB5259, possessing superior antibacterial activity against C. jejuni in vitro, in which a classical bacteriocin is probably not involved (1). Although in vivo trials revealed no protection against C. jejuni colonization (2), the strain can possibly delay colonization (3). The aim of this study was to produce a draft genome sequence of strain MB5259, which would assist in understanding of the mechanism of its antibacterial action. The sequencing data were generated using an Ion Torrent PGM with 314v2 chip and an Ion PGM Sequencing 400 kit. The data were collected from two runs with median sequencing read sizes of 316 nucleotides (nt) and 338 nt. The Ion Torrent de novo assembler plugin generated 46 contigs ranging between 1 kb and 559 kb in size. Read mapping to a reference E. faecalis Symbioflor 1 genome (4, 5) and generation of consensus sequences using CLC Genomics Workbench allowed the reduction of the number of contigs to 38, ranging between 1 and 717 kb, with N50 = 411 kb. The genome size (3,106,425 nt with coverage of 72.16×) and G+C content (37.5%) were in agreement with published data for other strains of this species (2.74 to 3.30 Mb and 37.4 to 37.8%, respectively). Analysis of unmapped reads revealed the genes present in the test strain but absent in the reference strain. One of these genes encodes gelatinase (coccolysin) GelE, a secreted peptidase found in some other strains of E. faecalis. GelE controls cellular chain length (6) and may also be involved in immune evasion via degradation of some components of the complement system (7). Another gene present in the test strain but not in the reference strain was the one encoding a ferro-lyase. Read mapping onto the Symbioflor 1 genome also revealed the genes present in the reference but not in the test genome. Among these were a number of hypothetical genes and the genes encoding transposases, DNA-binding response regulators, and sensor histidine kinases, as well as a large gene cluster (ca. 40 kb) containing polysaccharide biosynthesis-related genes. The strains shared genes encoding colicin V production family protein (100% identity) and two collagen-specific adhesins, as well as Zeta toxin, involved in bacterial dormancy. Mapping of reads onto available sequences of E. faecalis plasmids revealed similarity to the plasmids pTEF1 and pTEF2 but not to pTEF3 of strain V583. Instead, a 5.1-kb plasmid identical to EF62pA from strain 62 was found. Genome annotation using the RAST server (8) reported 3,056 protein-coding sequences. Among the other features, the genes responsible for resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics, vancomycin, and fluoroquinolones were detected. Further studies on comparative analysis of the genomes of various E. faecalis strains may assist in the development of novel recombinant probiotic strains.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession number JMEC00000000. The version described in this paper is version JMEC01000000.
  7 in total

1.  Screening for lactic acid bacteria capable of inhibiting Campylobacter jejuni in in vitro simulations of the broiler chicken caecal environment.

Authors:  J Robyn; G Rasschaert; W Messens; F Pasmans; M Heyndrickx
Journal:  Benef Microbes       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 4.205

2.  In vivo broiler experiments to assess anti-Campylobacter jejuni activity of a live Enterococcus faecalis strain.

Authors:  J Robyn; G Rasschaert; D Hermans; F Pasmans; M Heyndrickx
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Role of the Enterococcus faecalis GelE protease in determination of cellular chain length, supernatant pheromone levels, and degradation of fibrin and misfolded surface proteins.

Authors:  Christopher M Waters; Michelle H Antiporta; Barbara E Murray; Gary M Dunny
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Comparative genomic analysis for the presence of potential enterococcal virulence factors in the probiotic Enterococcus faecalis strain Symbioflor 1.

Authors:  Eugen Domann; Torsten Hain; Rohit Ghai; André Billion; Carsten Kuenne; Kurt Zimmermann; Trinad Chakraborty
Journal:  Int J Med Microbiol       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 3.473

5.  Immune evasion of Enterococcus faecalis by an extracellular gelatinase that cleaves C3 and iC3b.

Authors:  Shin Yong Park; Yong Pyo Shin; Chong Han Kim; Ho Jin Park; Yeon Sun Seong; Byung Sam Kim; Sook Jae Seo; In Hee Lee
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  Complete Genome Sequence of the Probiotic Enterococcus faecalis Symbioflor 1 Clone DSM 16431.

Authors:  Moritz Fritzenwanker; Carsten Kuenne; Andre Billion; Torsten Hain; Kurt Zimmermann; Alexander Goesmann; Trinad Chakraborty; Eugen Domann
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2013-02-07

7.  The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology.

Authors:  Ramy K Aziz; Daniela Bartels; Aaron A Best; Matthew DeJongh; Terrence Disz; Robert A Edwards; Kevin Formsma; Svetlana Gerdes; Elizabeth M Glass; Michael Kubal; Folker Meyer; Gary J Olsen; Robert Olson; Andrei L Osterman; Ross A Overbeek; Leslie K McNeil; Daniel Paarmann; Tobias Paczian; Bruce Parrello; Gordon D Pusch; Claudia Reich; Rick Stevens; Olga Vassieva; Veronika Vonstein; Andreas Wilke; Olga Zagnitko
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 3.969

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.