Michael J Simmonds1, Nazli Atac2, Oguz K Baskurt2, Herbert J Meiselman3, Ozlem Yalcin2. 1. Heart Foundation Research Centre, Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia. 2. School of Medicine, Koç University, Sariyer, Istanbul, Turkey. 3. Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated that red blood cells (RBC) either lyse or at least experience mechanical damage following prolonged exposure to high shear stress (≥100 Pa). Conversely, prolonged shear stress exposure within the physiological range (5-20 Pa, 300 s) was recently reported to improve RBC deformability. This study investigated the relationships between shear stress and RBC deformability to determine the breakpoint between beneficial vs. detrimental exposure to shear stress (i.e., "subhemolytic threshold"). A second aim of the study was to determine whether the frequency of intermittent application of shear stress influenced the subhemolytic threshold. METHODS: RBC were exposed to various levels of shear stress (0-100 Pa) in a Couette type shearing system for 300 s. RBC deformability was then immediately measured via ektacytometry. Parallel experiments were conducted at the same shear stresses, except the application time differed while keeping constant the total exposure time: shear stress was applied either for 30 s and repeated 10 times (10×30 s) or applied for 15 s and repeated 20 times (20×15 s). RESULTS: For a range of donors, the subhemolytic threshold with constant shear stress application was between 30-40 Pa. When physiological shear stress was applied in an intermittent manner, more frequent applications tended to improve (i.e., increase) RBC deformability. However, when supra-physiological shear stress was applied, both continuous and intermittent protocols damaged RBC. Changes of RBC mechanical behavior occurred without increases of hemoglobin in the suspending media, thus attesting to the absence of hemolysis. CONCLUSION: Shear stress has a biphasic effect on the mechanical properties of RBC, with the duration and rate of exposure appearing to have minimal impact on the subhemolytic threshold when compared with the magnitude of applied shear stress.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated that red blood cells (RBC) either lyse or at least experience mechanical damage following prolonged exposure to high shear stress (≥100 Pa). Conversely, prolonged shear stress exposure within the physiological range (5-20 Pa, 300 s) was recently reported to improve RBC deformability. This study investigated the relationships between shear stress and RBC deformability to determine the breakpoint between beneficial vs. detrimental exposure to shear stress (i.e., "subhemolytic threshold"). A second aim of the study was to determine whether the frequency of intermittent application of shear stress influenced the subhemolytic threshold. METHODS: RBC were exposed to various levels of shear stress (0-100 Pa) in a Couette type shearing system for 300 s. RBC deformability was then immediately measured via ektacytometry. Parallel experiments were conducted at the same shear stresses, except the application time differed while keeping constant the total exposure time: shear stress was applied either for 30 s and repeated 10 times (10×30 s) or applied for 15 s and repeated 20 times (20×15 s). RESULTS: For a range of donors, the subhemolytic threshold with constant shear stress application was between 30-40 Pa. When physiological shear stress was applied in an intermittent manner, more frequent applications tended to improve (i.e., increase) RBC deformability. However, when supra-physiological shear stress was applied, both continuous and intermittent protocols damaged RBC. Changes of RBC mechanical behavior occurred without increases of hemoglobin in the suspending media, thus attesting to the absence of hemolysis. CONCLUSION: Shear stress has a biphasic effect on the mechanical properties of RBC, with the duration and rate of exposure appearing to have minimal impact on the subhemolytic threshold when compared with the magnitude of applied shear stress.
Authors: James P Buerck; Dustin K Burke; David W Schmidtke; Trevor A Snyder; Dimitrios V Papavassiliou; Edgar A O'Rear Journal: J Artif Organs Date: 2021-01-09 Impact factor: 1.731
Authors: James P Buerck; Dustin K Burke; David W Schmidtke; Trevor A Snyder; Dimitrios Papavassiliou; Edgar A O'Rear Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-12-19 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: K Kapnisis; H Seidner; M Prokopi; D Pasias; C Pitsillides; A Anayiotos; E Kaliviotis Journal: Clin Hemorheol Microcirc Date: 2019 Impact factor: 2.375