Literature DB >> 24948156

Neural patterns underlying social comparisons of personal performance.

Michael Lindner1, Sarah Rudorf2, Robert Birg3, Armin Falk3, Bernd Weber4, Klaus Fliessbach5.   

Abstract

Humans often evaluate their abilities by comparing their personal performance with that of others. For this process, it is critical whether the comparison turns out in one's favor or against it. Here, we investigate how social comparisons of performance are encoded and integrated on the neural level. We collected functional magnetic resonance images while subjects answered questions in a knowledge quiz that was related to their profession. After each question, subjects received a feedback about their personal performance, followed by a feedback about the performance of a reference group who had been quizzed beforehand. Based on the subjects' personal performance, we divided trials in downward and upward comparisons. We found that upward comparisons correlated with activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the anterior insula. Downward comparisons were associated with increased activation in the ventral striatum (VS), the medial orbitofrontal cortex and the ventral anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). The extent to which subjects outperformed the reference group modulated the activity in the VS and in the dorsal ACC. We suggest that the co-activation of the VS and the dorsal ACC contributes to the integration of downward comparisons into the evaluation of personal performance.
© The Author (2014). Published by Oxford University Press. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  downward comparison; fMRI; performance; self-evaluation; social comparison

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24948156      PMCID: PMC4381240          DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsu087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci        ISSN: 1749-5016            Impact factor:   3.436


  32 in total

1.  Dissociation of reward anticipation and outcome with event-related fMRI.

Authors:  B Knutson; G W Fong; C M Adams; J L Varner; D Hommer
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-12-04       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Self-responsibility and the self-serving bias: an fMRI investigation of causal attributions.

Authors:  N J Blackwood; R P Bentall; D H ffytche; A Simmons; R M Murray; R J Howard
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Causes of social reward differences encoded in human brain.

Authors:  Alexander Vostroknutov; Philippe N Tobler; Aldo Rustichini
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Self-control in decision-making involves modulation of the vmPFC valuation system.

Authors:  Todd A Hare; Colin F Camerer; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Neural evidence for individual and cultural variability in the social comparison effect.

Authors:  Pyungwon Kang; Yongsil Lee; Incheol Choi; Hackjin Kim
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Effort increases sensitivity to reward and loss magnitude in the human brain.

Authors:  Julen Hernandez Lallement; Katarina Kuss; Peter Trautner; Bernd Weber; Armin Falk; Klaus Fliessbach
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Neural correlates of anticipation risk reflect risk preferences.

Authors:  Sarah Rudorf; Kerstin Preuschoff; Bernd Weber
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Hypothalamic abnormalities in schizophrenia: sex effects and genetic vulnerability.

Authors:  Jill M Goldstein; Larry J Seidman; Nikos Makris; Todd Ahern; Liam M O'Brien; Verne S Caviness; David N Kennedy; Stephen V Faraone; Ming T Tsuang
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 9.  How do you feel--now? The anterior insula and human awareness.

Authors:  A D Bud Craig
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Three ways in which midline regions contribute to self-evaluation.

Authors:  Taru Flagan; Jennifer S Beer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  10 in total

1.  Social comparison in the brain: A coordinate-based meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies on the downward and upward comparisons.

Authors:  Yi Luo; Simon B Eickhoff; Sébastien Hétu; Chunliang Feng
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Neuroanatomical substrates of maximizing tendency in decision-making: a voxel-based morphometric study.

Authors:  Hanqi Zhang; Shiyu Wei; Yajie Wang; Jie Feng
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.224

Review 3.  Neural mechanisms of social learning and decision-making.

Authors:  Yinmei Ni; Jian Li
Journal:  Sci China Life Sci       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 6.038

4.  Cultural influences on the processing of social comparison feedback signals-an ERP study.

Authors:  Daniela M Pfabigan; Anna M Wucherer; Xuena Wang; Xinyue Pan; Claus Lamm; Shihui Han
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Sex differences in own and other body perception.

Authors:  Sarah M Burke; D S Adnan Majid; Amir H Manzouri; Teena Moody; Jamie D Feusner; Ivanka Savic
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Upward and downward comparisons across monetary and status domains.

Authors:  Zachary A Yaple; Rongjun Yu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Right Lateral Prefrontal Cortex Increases Maximization Tendencies.

Authors:  Haixia Wang; Hanqi Zhang
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  Short- and long-run goals in ultimatum bargaining: impatience predicts spite-based behavior.

Authors:  Antonio M Espín; Filippos Exadaktylos; Benedikt Herrmann; Pablo Brañas-Garza
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  Being right, but losing money: the role of striatum in joint decision making.

Authors:  M I Ruissen; S Overgaauw; E R A de Bruijn
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Internal control beliefs and reference frame concurrently impact early performance monitoring ERPs.

Authors:  Daniela M Pfabigan; Anna M Wucherer; Claus Lamm
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.282

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.