Literature DB >> 24947927

Phase I expansion and pharmacodynamic study of the oral MEK inhibitor RO4987655 (CH4987655) in selected patients with advanced cancer with RAS-RAF mutations.

Lisa Zimmer1, Fabrice Barlesi2, Maria Martinez-Garcia3, Veronique Dieras4, Jan H M Schellens5, Jean-Philippe Spano6, Mark R Middleton7, Emiliano Calvo8, Luiz Paz-Ares9, James Larkin10, Simon Pacey11, Miro Venturi12, Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré13, Jean J L Tessier14, Wilfried Ernst Erich Eberhardt15, Michel Paques16, Ernesto Guarin14, Valerie Meresse14, Jean-Charles Soria17.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This phase I expansion study assessed safety, pharmacodynamic effects, and antitumor activity of RO4987655, a pure MEK inhibitor, in selected patients with advanced solid tumor. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: We undertook a multicenter phase I two-part study (dose escalation and cohort expansion). Here, we present the part 2 expansion that included melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and colorectal cancer with oral RO4987655 administered continuously at recommended doses of 8.5 mg twice daily until progressive disease (PD). Sequential tumor sampling investigated multiple markers of pathway activation/tumor effects, including ERK phosphorylation and Ki-67 expression. BRAF and KRAS testing were implemented as selection criteria and broader tumor mutational analysis added.
RESULTS: Ninety-five patients received RO4987655, including 18 BRAF-mutant melanoma, 23 BRAF wild-type melanoma, 24 KRAS-mutant NSCLC, and 30 KRAS-mutant colorectal cancer. Most frequent adverse events were rash, acneiform dermatitis, and gastrointestinal disorders, mostly grade 1/2. Four (24%) of 17 BRAF-mutated melanoma had partial response as did four (20%) of 20 BRAF wild-type melanoma and two (11%) of 18 KRAS-mutant NSCLC. All KRAS-mutant colorectal cancer developed PD. Paired tumor biopsies demonstrated reduced ERK phosphorylation among all cohorts but significant differences among cohorts in Ki-67 modulation. Sixty-nine percent showed a decrease in fluorodeoxyglucose uptake between baseline and day 15. Detailed mutational profiling confirmed RAS/RAF screening and identified additional aberrations (NRAS/non-BRAF melanomas; PIK3CA/KRAS colorectal cancer) without therapeutic implications.
CONCLUSIONS: Safety profile of RO4987655 was comparable with other MEK inhibitors. Single-agent activity was observed in all entities except colorectal cancer. Evidence of target modulation and early biologic activity was shown among all indications independent of mutational status. Clin Cancer Res; 20(16); 4251-61. ©2014 AACR. ©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24947927     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  35 in total

Review 1.  RAS-targeted therapies: is the undruggable drugged?

Authors:  Amanda R Moore; Scott C Rosenberg; Frank McCormick; Shiva Malek
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 2.  Molecular markers predictive of chemotherapy response in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Stacey Shiovitz; William M Grady
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2015-02

Review 3.  From tumour heterogeneity to advances in precision treatment of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Cornelis J A Punt; Miriam Koopman; Louis Vermeulen
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 4.  MEK inhibition in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Thomas E Stinchcombe; Gary L Johnson
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 5.705

5.  Targeting PHGDH Upregulation Reduces Glutathione Levels and Resensitizes Resistant NRAS-Mutant Melanoma to MAPK Kinase Inhibition.

Authors:  Mai Q Nguyen; Jessica L F Teh; Timothy J Purwin; Inna Chervoneva; Michael A Davies; Katherine L Nathanson; Phil F Cheng; Mitchell P Levesque; Reinhard Dummer; Andrew E Aplin
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 8.551

Review 6.  Targeting mutant NRAS signaling pathways in melanoma.

Authors:  Ha Linh Vu; Andrew E Aplin
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 7.658

7.  A Functional Landscape of Resistance to MEK1/2 and CDK4/6 Inhibition in NRAS-Mutant Melanoma.

Authors:  Tikvah K Hayes; Flora Luo; Ofir Cohen; Amy B Goodale; Yenarae Lee; Sasha Pantel; Mukta Bagul; Federica Piccioni; David E Root; Levi A Garraway; Matthew Meyerson; Cory M Johannessen
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 8.  Interrogating open issues in cancer precision medicine with patient-derived xenografts.

Authors:  Annette T Byrne; Denis G Alférez; Frédéric Amant; Daniela Annibali; Joaquín Arribas; Andrew V Biankin; Alejandra Bruna; Eva Budinská; Carlos Caldas; David K Chang; Robert B Clarke; Hans Clevers; George Coukos; Virginie Dangles-Marie; S Gail Eckhardt; Eva Gonzalez-Suarez; Els Hermans; Manuel Hidalgo; Monika A Jarzabek; Steven de Jong; Jos Jonkers; Kristel Kemper; Luisa Lanfrancone; Gunhild Mari Mælandsmo; Elisabetta Marangoni; Jean-Christophe Marine; Enzo Medico; Jens Henrik Norum; Héctor G Palmer; Daniel S Peeper; Pier Giuseppe Pelicci; Alejandro Piris-Gimenez; Sergio Roman-Roman; Oscar M Rueda; Joan Seoane; Violeta Serra; Laura Soucek; Dominique Vanhecke; Alberto Villanueva; Emilie Vinolo; Andrea Bertotti; Livio Trusolino
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 60.716

9.  Targeting RAS-mutant cancers: is ERK the key?

Authors:  Meagan B Ryan; Channing J Der; Andrea Wang-Gillam; Adrienne D Cox
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2015-11-01

Review 10.  Treatment of NRAS-mutant melanoma.

Authors:  Douglas B Johnson; Igor Puzanov
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2015-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.