Literature DB >> 24947816

Why are the truncated cyclin Es more effective CDK2 activators than the full-length isoforms?

Soumya Lipsa Rath1, Sanjib Senapati.   

Abstract

Cell cycle regulating enzymes, CDKs, become activated upon association with their regulatory proteins, cyclins. The G1 cyclin, cyclin E, is overexpressed and present in low molecular weight (LMW) isoforms in breast cancer cells and tumor tissues. In vivo and in vitro studies have shown that these LMW isoforms of cyclin E hyperactivate CDK2 and accelerate the G1-S phase of cell division. The molecular basis of CDK2 hyperactivation due to LMW cyclin E isoforms in cancer cells is, however, unknown. Here, we employ a computational approach, combining homology modeling, bioinformatics analyses, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, and principal component analyses to unravel the key structural features of CDK2-bound full-length and LMW isoforms of cyclin E1 and correlate those features to their differential activity. Results suggest that the missing N- and C-terminal regions of the cyclin E LMW isoforms constitute the Nuclear Localization Sequence (NLS) and PEST domains and are intrinsically disordered. These regions, when present in the full-length cyclin E/CDK2 complex, weaken the cyclin-CDK interface packing due to the loss of a large number of key interface interactions. Such weakening is manifested in the decreased contact area and increased solvent accessibility at the interface and also by the absence of concerted motions between the two partner proteins in the full-length complex. More effective packing and interactions between CDK2 and LMW cyclin E isoforms, however, produce more efficient protein-protein complexes that accelerate the cell division processes in cancer cells, where these cyclin E isoforms are overexpressed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24947816     DOI: 10.1021/bi5004052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  8 in total

1.  Cyclin E Associates with the Lipogenic Enzyme ATP-Citrate Lyase to Enable Malignant Growth of Breast Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Kimberly S Lucenay; Iman Doostan; Cansu Karakas; Tuyen Bui; Zhiyong Ding; Gordon B Mills; Kelly K Hunt; Khandan Keyomarsi
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Cul3 regulates cyclin E1 protein abundance via a degron located within the N-terminal region of cyclin E.

Authors:  Brittney Davidge; Katia Graziella de Oliveira Rebola; Larry N Agbor; Curt D Sigmund; Jeffrey D Singer
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 5.285

3.  Cytoplasmic Cyclin E Predicts Recurrence in Patients with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Kelly K Hunt; Khandan Keyomarsi; Cansu Karakas; Min Jin Ha; Anna Biernacka; Min Yi; Aysegul A Sahin; Opoku Adjapong; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Melissa Bondy; Patricia Thompson; Kwok Leung Cheung; Ian O Ellis; Sarah Bacus; W Fraser Symmans; Kim-Anh Do
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 4.  New targeted therapies for breast cancer: A focus on tumor microenvironmental signals and chemoresistant breast cancers.

Authors:  Armel Hervé Nwabo Kamdje; Paul Faustin Seke Etet; Lorella Vecchio; Richard Simo Tagne; Jeremie Mbo Amvene; Jean-Marc Muller; Mauro Krampera; Kiven Erique Lukong
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 1.337

5.  Cytoplasmic Cyclin E and Phospho-Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 2 Are Biomarkers of Aggressive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Cansu Karakas; Anna Biernacka; Tuyen Bui; Aysegul A Sahin; Min Yi; Said Akli; Jolie Schafer; Angela Alexander; Opoku Adjapong; Kelly K Hunt; Khandan Keyomarsi
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 4.307

6.  PKCiota promotes ovarian tumor progression through deregulation of cyclin E.

Authors:  A Nanos-Webb; T Bui; C Karakas; D Zhang; J P W Carey; G B Mills; K K Hunt; K Keyomarsi
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 9.867

7.  How Does Temperature Affect the Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 M Proteins? Insights from Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Soumya Lipsa Rath; Madhusmita Tripathy; Nabanita Mandal
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 2.426

8.  Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 is a new predictor of radiosensitivity on esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Li-Ling Luo; Lei Zhao; Ying-Xue Wang; Xiao-Peng Tian; Mian Xi; Jing-Xian Shen; Li-Ru He; Qiao-Qiao Li; Shi-Liang Liu; Peng Zhang; Dan Xie; Meng-Zhong Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.