Literature DB >> 24947626

Current organisation of follow-up does not meet cancer patients' needs.

Cecilie Sperling1, Mette Sandager, Henry Jensen, Janne Lehmann Knudsen.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: For cancer patients, traditional follow-up care is considered unsuitable and unsustainable. The patient perspective seems often to be absent in the ongoing debate about alternative strategies for follow-up care. Based on a national survey from 2012, the objective of this study was to examine cancer patients' support needs regarding physiological and emotional problems during follow-up and to identify factors associated with their needs and any unmet needs.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with cancer in the period from April to September 2010 were invited to participate. A total of 4,401 patients responded (response rate = 64%). The risks in terms of prevalence rate ratios of having needs and unmet needs for both physiological and emotional problems were estimated using the Poisson regression.
RESULTS: The study showed that 60% of the patients had needs for support regarding physiological and emotional problems, and half of the patients reported unmet needs. Younger patients and patients with co-morbidity were more likely to report needs and unmet needs for physiological and emotional support. Treatment complexity and setting of follow-up were not associated with unmet needs.
CONCLUSION: The study underlines that the current organisation of follow-up does not meet cancer patients' needs. Several factors are associated with both needs and unmet needs. Hence, a more sustainable approach for follow-up care may consist in stratification tailored to the patients' different needs. In such an approach, more focus should be on age-specific needs and the impact of co-morbidity. FUNDING: The study is funded by the Danish Cancer Society. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (J. no. 2010-41-4694). According to the Danish Act on Research Ethics Review of Health Research Projects (S. 8(3) of Act No. 402 of 28 May 2003), no ethical approval was needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24947626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dan Med J        ISSN: 2245-1919            Impact factor:   1.240


  4 in total

1.  Patients with multimorbidity and their experiences with the healthcare process: a scoping review.

Authors:  Maartje J van der Aa; Jennifer R van den Broeke; Karien Stronks; Thomas Plochg
Journal:  J Comorb       Date:  2017-01-27

2.  What are the prevalence and predictors of psychosocial healthcare among patients with heart disease? A nationwide population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Line Zinckernagel; Annette Kjær Ersbøll; Teresa Holmberg; Susanne S Pedersen; Helle Ussing Timm; Ann-Dorthe Zwisler
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Attention to bone health in follow-up of gynaecological cancers in tertiary care.

Authors:  Catherine A O'Gorman; Sorcha Minnock; Joseph Mulhall; Noreen Gleeson
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec

4.  From physical to virtual: How the COVID-19 pandemic changed a tertiary gynaecologic oncology surveillance program in Ireland.

Authors:  Joseph Mulhall; Fionán Donohoe; Siobhán Moran; Edward Corry; Kate Glennon; Sheilah Broderick; Emma Nixon; Sandra Tara; Orlagh Lennon; Ruaidhrí McVey; Claire Thompson; William Boyd; Thomas Walsh; Donal J Brennan
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-06-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.