Literature DB >> 24947544

Sperm DNA integrity testing: big halo is a good predictor of embryo quality and pregnancy after conventional IVF.

M Tandara1, A Bajić, L Tandara, L Bilić-Zulle, M Šunj, V Kozina, T Goluža, M Jukić.   

Abstract

Sperm DNA integrity is a sperm functional parameter of male fertility evaluation. Two parameters of sperm DNA integrity were observed: DNA damage expressed as DNA fragmentation index (DFI) and percentage of the DNA undamaged spermatozoa expressed as big halo. Halosperm test was used for sperm DNA integrity determination. The aim of this study was to evaluate which DNA integrity parameter is better as an embryo quality and pregnancy prognostic parameter after the conventional IVF. We evaluated two embryo groups (positive and negative group) according to the 3rd day cumulative embryo score. Big halo and DFI, as we expected, showed good correlation (r = -0.69; p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses show that DFI and big halo are significant (p < 0.001) as prognostic parameters of embryo quality. ROC curves comparison of DFI and big halo revealed the AUC value for big halo to be significantly higher (DFI AUC = 0.71 vs. big halo AUC = 0.83; p = 0.025) than for DFI. Big halo was found to be the only independent predictor of embryo quality. Sperm DNA integrity both parameters are good prognostic parameters of embryo quality after the conventional IVF where big halo seems to be better. ROC analyses show DFI and big halo as significant prognostic parameters for achieved pregnancy (AUC ± SE for DFI was 0.67 ± 0.06 and 0.75 ± 0.06 for big halo). To our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating the correlation between sperm DNA undamaged rate expressed as big halo parameter and semen characteristics as well as the influence on fertilization rate, embryo quality and pregnancy in conventional IVF.
© 2014 American Society of Andrology and European Academy of Andrology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DFI; big halo; conventional IVF; embryo quality; halosperm test; pregnancy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24947544     DOI: 10.1111/j.2047-2927.2014.00234.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Andrology        ISSN: 2047-2919            Impact factor:   3.842


  15 in total

Review 1.  Paternal factors contributing to embryo quality.

Authors:  Stacy Colaco; Denny Sakkas
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  The effect of human sperm chromatin maturity on ICSI outcomes.

Authors:  Kamil Gill; Aleksandra Rosiak; Dariusz Gaczarzewicz; Joanna Jakubik; Rafal Kurzawa; Anna Kazienko; Anna Rymaszewska; Maria Laszczynska; Elzbieta Grochans; Malgorzata Piasecka
Journal:  Hum Cell       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 4.174

3.  The pellet swim-up is the best technique for sperm preparation during in vitro fertilization procedures.

Authors:  Aldo Volpes; Francesca Sammartano; Simona Rizzari; Salvatore Gullo; Angelo Marino; Adolfo Allegra
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Investigation on the origin of sperm morphological defects: oxidative attacks, chromatin immaturity, and DNA fragmentation.

Authors:  Ammar Oumaima; Ajina Tesnim; Haouas Zohra; Sallem Amira; Zidi Ines; Chakroun Sana; Grissa Intissar; Ezzi Lobna; Jlali Ali; Mehdi Meriem
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Single cell analysis of DNA in more than 10,000 individual sperm from men with abnormal reproductive outcomes.

Authors:  Angela Q Leung; Avery Davis Bell; Curtis J Mello; Alan S Penzias; Steven A McCarroll; Denny Sakkas
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  Machine learning for sperm selection.

Authors:  Jae Bem You; Christopher McCallum; Yihe Wang; Jason Riordon; Reza Nosrati; David Sinton
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 7.  Current updates on laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of male reproductive failure.

Authors:  Suresh C Sikka; Wayne J G Hellstrom
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

8.  Does conventional freezing affect sperm DNA fragmentation?

Authors:  Minh Tam Le; Thai Thanh Thi Nguyen; Tung Thanh Nguyen; Trung Van Nguyen; Tam An Thi Nguyen; Quoc Huy Vu Nguyen; Thanh Ngoc Cao
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2019-06-01

9.  Sperm DNA fragmentation and sex chromosome aneuploidy after swim-up versus density gradient centrifugation.

Authors:  Sung Woo Kim; Byung Chul Jee; Seul Ki Kim; Seok Hyun Kim
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2017-12-31

10.  Sperm DNA damage has a negative effect on early embryonic development following in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Wei-Wei Zheng; Ge Song; Qi-Ling Wang; Shan-Wen Liu; Xiao-Li Zhu; Shun-Mei Deng; An Zhong; Yu-Mei Tan; Ying Tan
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.