Literature DB >> 24947185

High-definition white-light (HDWL) colonoscopy and higher adenoma detection rate and the potential for paradoxical over surveillance.

Victoria Gómez1, Ronald G Racho, Michael G Heckman, Nancy N Diehl, Michael B Wallace.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing high-definition white-light colonoscopy by a high adenoma detector may have a lower risk of interval adenoma detection on follow-up colonoscopy and may require less frequent follow-up but may paradoxically be assigned to more frequent surveillance when more adenomas are detected. AIMS: To evaluate whether high-definition white-light colonoscopy (vs. standard-definition white-light colonoscopy) and endoscopist adenoma detection rate (ADR) at index colonoscopy are associated with increased likelihood of adenomas at follow-up.
METHODS: Longitudinal follow-up of prior cross-section cohort study of patients who underwent colonoscopy at baseline with at least one detected adenoma was included. Associations of type of white-light at index colonoscopy and the ADR of the endoscopist at index colonoscopy (high vs. low adenoma detector) were evaluated with various adenoma and polyp detection endpoints. Eighteen endoscopists were classified as high and low adenoma detectors based on the median ADR of 0.255.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in subsequent interval adenoma or polyp detection endpoints with regard to whether baseline exam was performed with high-definition white-light or standard-definition white-light colonoscopy nor between high and low ADR after adjusting for multiple testing (P ≤ 0.0029 considered significant). Prior to multiple testing adjustment, there was a significantly lower detection rate of hyperplastic polyps in the left colon (24 vs. 35 %, OR: 0.56, P = 0.033) at follow-up colonoscopy when baseline exam was performed with high-definition white-light index colonoscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study do not support adjusting colonoscopy surveillance guidelines based on type of colonoscopy performed or the endoscopist's ADR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24947185     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-014-3253-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  14 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  David A Lieberman; Douglas K Rex; Sidney J Winawer; Francis M Giardiello; David A Johnson; Theodore R Levin
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; John L Petrini; Todd H Baron; Amitabh Chak; Jonathan Cohen; Stephen E Deal; Brenda Hoffman; Brian C Jacobson; Klaus Mergener; Bret T Petersen; Michael A Safdi; Douglas O Faigel; Irving M Pike
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 3.  Advanced colorectal polyp detection techniques.

Authors:  Bashar J Qumseya; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2012-10

4.  Prevalence and variable detection of proximal colon serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Charles J Kahi; David G Hewett; Dustin Lee Norton; George J Eckert; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 11.382

5.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer.

Authors:  Michal F Kaminski; Jaroslaw Regula; Ewa Kraszewska; Marcin Polkowski; Urszula Wojciechowska; Joanna Didkowska; Maria Zwierko; Maciej Rupinski; Marek P Nowacki; Eugeniusz Butruk
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Cancer statistics, 2012.

Authors:  Rebecca Siegel; Deepa Naishadham; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Relationship between detection of adenomas by flexible sigmoidoscopy and interval distal colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Shari S Rogal; Paul F Pinsky; Robert E Schoen
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 11.382

8.  High-definition colonoscopy detects colorectal polyps at a higher rate than standard white-light colonoscopy.

Authors:  Anna M Buchner; Muhammad W Shahid; Michael G Heckman; Rebecca B McNeil; Patrick Cleveland; Kanwar R Gill; Anthony Schore; Marwan Ghabril; Massimo Raimondo; Seth A Gross; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-11-22       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected].

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; David A Johnson; Joseph C Anderson; Phillip S Schoenfeld; Carol A Burke; John M Inadomi
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Adenoma detection in patients undergoing a comprehensive colonoscopy screening.

Authors:  Gottumukkala S Raju; Vikram Vadyala; Rebecca Slack; Somashekar G Krishna; William A Ross; Patrick M Lynch; Robert S Bresalier; Ernest Hawk; John R Stroehlein
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 4.452

View more
  3 in total

1.  Does the "polyp paradox" really exist?

Authors:  Helmut Neumann; Rungsun Rerknimitr
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  High-definition endoscopy with digital chromoendoscopy for histologic prediction of distal colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Timo Rath; Gian E Tontini; Andreas Nägel; Michael Vieth; Steffen Zopf; Claudia Günther; Arthur Hoffman; Markus F Neurath; Helmut Neumann
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Factors Associated with Polyp Detection Rate in European Colonoscopy Practice: Findings of The European Colonoscopy Quality Investigation (ECQI) Group.

Authors:  Cristiano Spada; Anastasios Koulaouzidis; Cesare Hassan; Pedro Amaro; Anurag Agrawal; Lene Brink; Wolfgang Fischbach; Matthias Hünger; Rodrigo Jover; Urpo Kinnunen; Akiko Ono; Árpád Patai; Silvia Pecere; Lucio Petruzziello; Jürgen Ferdinand Riemann; Harry Staines; Ann L Stringer; Ervin Toth; Giulio Antonelli; Lorenzo Fuccio
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-13       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.