Literature DB >> 2494660

Analyzing variation in egg-to-adult viability in experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

B Wallace1.   

Abstract

Selective culling in populations of most organisms is rank-order: individuals of low rank on a scale of potential fitnesses tend to be eliminated during early development, whereas surviving adults (whose number reflects the carrying capacity of the environment) are generally drawn from the distribution's upper end. Haldane pointed out [Haldane, J.B.S. (1932) The Causes of Evolution (Harper & Row, New York)] that selection which favors individuals in the upper tail of a composite distribution curve tends to favor members of the more variable of two populations, rather than members of a less variable one, even though the latter may possess the higher mean. In addition to reviewing earlier observations bearing on Haldane's argument, the present report describes an analysis of the comparative egg-to-adult viabilities of flies (Drosophila melanogaster) carrying combinations of second chromosomes obtained from one or another of eight experimental populations. Overall, the viabilities of flies carrying combinations of chromosomes one of which is shared (i/j vs. j/k) are as different as those of flies carrying combinations of independently sampled chromosomes (i/j vs. k/l). Episodes seemingly occurred within the populations during which flies carrying combinations that shared a chromosome differed more in their viabilities than flies carrying unrelated combinations. Such episodes could reflect the occurrence of selection of the sort described by Haldane.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2494660      PMCID: PMC286859          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.86.6.2117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  8 in total

1.  A comparison of the viability effects of chromosomes in heterozygous and homozygous condition.

Authors:  B WALLACE
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1963-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Adaptive organization of the gene pools of Drosophila populations.

Authors:  B WALLACE; M VETUKHIV
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1955

3.  The Genetics of Homeostasis in Drosophila.

Authors:  T Dobzhansky; B Wallace
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1953-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Experiments with the Chemostat on spontaneous mutations of bacteria.

Authors:  A NOVICK; L SZILARD
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1950-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Genetic changeover in Drosophila populations.

Authors:  B Wallace
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Multiplicative genotype-environment interaction as a cause of reversed response to directional selection.

Authors:  A Gimelfarb
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Deleterious mutations as an evolutionary factor. 1. The advantage of recombination.

Authors:  A S Kondrashov
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  Mathematical models for chromosomal inversions.

Authors:  W T Federer; R G Steel; B Wallace
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1967-04       Impact factor: 4.562

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.