Literature DB >> 24946208

Balancing energetic and cognitive resources: memory use during search depends on the orienting effector.

Grayden J F Solman1, Alan Kingstone2.   

Abstract

Search outside the laboratory involves tradeoffs among a variety of internal and external exploratory processes. Here we examine the conditions under which item specific memory from prior exposures to a search array is used to guide attention during search. We extend the hypothesis that memory use increases as perceptual search becomes more difficult by turning to an ecologically important type of search difficulty - energetic cost. Using optical motion tracking, we introduce a novel head-contingent display system, which enables the direct comparison of search using head movements and search using eye movements. Consistent with the increased energetic cost of turning the head to orient attention, we discover greater use of memory in head-contingent versus eye-contingent search, as reflected in both timing and orienting metrics. Our results extend theories of memory use in search to encompass embodied factors, and highlight the importance of accounting for the costs and constraints of the specific motor groups used in a given task when evaluating cognitive effects.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Embodied cognition; Memory; Search

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24946208     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  11 in total

Review 1.  Control of gaze in natural environments: effects of rewards and costs, uncertainty and memory in target selection.

Authors:  Mary M Hayhoe; Jonathan Samir Matthis
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 3.906

2.  The confirmation and prevalence biases in visual search reflect separate underlying processes.

Authors:  Stephen C Walenchok; Stephen D Goldinger; Michael C Hout
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 3.  The role of memory for visual search in scenes.

Authors:  Melissa Le-Hoa Võ; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Recentering bias for temporal saccades only: Evidence from binocular recordings of eye movements.

Authors:  Jérôme Tagu; Karine Doré-Mazars; Judith Vergne; Christelle Lemoine-Lardennois; Dorine Vergilino-Perez
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Memory shapes visual search strategies in large-scale environments.

Authors:  Chia-Ling Li; M Pilar Aivar; Matthew H Tong; Mary M Hayhoe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Spatial organization to facilitate action.

Authors:  Grayden J F Solman; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  When Natural Behavior Engages Working Memory.

Authors:  Dejan Draschkow; Melvin Kallmayer; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Memory and visual search in naturalistic 2D and 3D environments.

Authors:  Chia-Ling Li; M Pilar Aivar; Dmitry M Kit; Matthew H Tong; Mary M Hayhoe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Eye and head movements are complementary in visual selection.

Authors:  Grayden J F Solman; Tom Foulsham; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Davida Teller Award Lecture 2017: What can be learned from natural behavior?

Authors:  Mary M Hayhoe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.