Ivy Shiue1. 1. School of the Built Environment, Heriot-Watt University, UK and Owens Institute for Behavioral Research, University of Georgia , USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A link between environmental chemicals and human health has emerged but not complete in risk factors. This work aimed to study the relationships of different sets of urinary environmental chemical concentrations and risk of high blood pressure (BP) in a national, population-based study. METHODS: Data was retrieved from United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 2009-2010, including demographics, BP readings and urinary environmental chemical concentrations. Analyses included t-test and survey-weighted logistic regression models. RESULTS: Urinary mercury concentrations were not associated with high BP (OR = 1.19, 95% CI 0.97-1.48, p = 0.095). Urinary cobalt (OR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.01-1.81, p = 0.044), lead (OR = 1.77, 95% CI 1.31-2.38, p = 0.001), antimony (OR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.09-1.72, p = 0.010) and tungsten (OR = 1.52, 95% CI 1.27-1.81, p < 0.001) concentrations were observed to increase the risk of high BP. There are no clear associations between environmental parabens and high BP. The effect of environmental bisphenol A (OR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.00-1.30, p = 0.051) disappeared after additionally adjusting for subsample weighting (OR = 1.12, 95% CI 0.93-1.35, p = 0.225). People with higher urinary mono-2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl phthalate (OR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.00-1.58, p = 0.051), mono-n-butyl phthalate (OR = 1.19, 95% CI 1.01-1.41, p = 0.042) and mono-n-methyl phthalate metabolites (OR = 1.16, 95% CI 1.03-1.32, p = 0.021) tended to have high BP. Moreover, urinary o-phenyl phenol concentrations (OR = 1.49, 95% CI 1.25-1.77, p < 0.001) and dimethylarsonic acid concentrations (OR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.06-1.73, p = 0.019) were also seen to be associated with high BP. CONCLUSIONS: Urinary environmental chemical concentrations were associated with risk of high BP, although the causal effect cannot be established. Elimination of environmental chemicals in humans would need to be continued.
BACKGROUND: A link between environmental chemicals and human health has emerged but not complete in risk factors. This work aimed to study the relationships of different sets of urinary environmental chemical concentrations and risk of high blood pressure (BP) in a national, population-based study. METHODS: Data was retrieved from United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 2009-2010, including demographics, BP readings and urinary environmental chemical concentrations. Analyses included t-test and survey-weighted logistic regression models. RESULTS: Urinary mercury concentrations were not associated with high BP (OR = 1.19, 95% CI 0.97-1.48, p = 0.095). Urinary cobalt (OR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.01-1.81, p = 0.044), lead (OR = 1.77, 95% CI 1.31-2.38, p = 0.001), antimony (OR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.09-1.72, p = 0.010) and tungsten (OR = 1.52, 95% CI 1.27-1.81, p < 0.001) concentrations were observed to increase the risk of high BP. There are no clear associations between environmental parabens and high BP. The effect of environmental bisphenol A (OR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.00-1.30, p = 0.051) disappeared after additionally adjusting for subsample weighting (OR = 1.12, 95% CI 0.93-1.35, p = 0.225). People with higher urinary mono-2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl phthalate (OR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.00-1.58, p = 0.051), mono-n-butyl phthalate (OR = 1.19, 95% CI 1.01-1.41, p = 0.042) and mono-n-methyl phthalate metabolites (OR = 1.16, 95% CI 1.03-1.32, p = 0.021) tended to have high BP. Moreover, urinary o-phenyl phenol concentrations (OR = 1.49, 95% CI 1.25-1.77, p < 0.001) and dimethylarsonic acid concentrations (OR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.06-1.73, p = 0.019) were also seen to be associated with high BP. CONCLUSIONS: Urinary environmental chemical concentrations were associated with risk of high BP, although the causal effect cannot be established. Elimination of environmental chemicals in humans would need to be continued.
Authors: John A Kaufman; Claire Mattison; Amanda M Fretts; Jason G Umans; Shelley A Cole; V Saroja Voruganti; Walter Goessler; Lyle G Best; Ying Zhang; Maria Tellez-Plaza; Ana Navas-Acien; Matthew O Gribble Journal: Environ Res Date: 2021-02-11 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Fanny Rancière; Jasmine G Lyons; Venurs H Y Loh; Jérémie Botton; Tamara Galloway; Tiange Wang; Jonathan E Shaw; Dianna J Magliano Journal: Environ Health Date: 2015-05-31 Impact factor: 5.984
Authors: Rajiv Chowdhury; Anna Ramond; Linda M O'Keeffe; Sara Shahzad; Setor K Kunutsor; Taulant Muka; John Gregson; Peter Willeit; Samantha Warnakula; Hassan Khan; Susmita Chowdhury; Reeta Gobin; Oscar H Franco; Emanuele Di Angelantonio Journal: BMJ Date: 2018-08-29
Authors: Astrid N Zamora; Erica C Jansen; Marcela Tamayo-Ortiz; Jaclyn M Goodrich; Brisa N Sánchez; Deborah J Watkins; Juan Alfredo Tamayo-Orozco; Martha M Téllez-Rojo; Adriana Mercado-García; Ana Baylin; John D Meeker; Karen E Peterson Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2021-02-26