Literature DB >> 24945873

Scaffold pore size modulates in vitro osteogenesis of human adipose-derived stem/stromal cells.

Pinar Yilgor Huri1, B Arda Ozilgen, Daphne L Hutton, Warren L Grayson.   

Abstract

Trabecular bone has an interconnected porous structure, which influences cellular responses, biochemical transport and mechanical strength. Appropriately mimicking this structural organization in biomaterial scaffolds can facilitate more robust bone tissue regeneration and integration by providing a native microenvironment to the cells. This study examined the effect of pore size on human adipose-derived stem/stromal cell (ASC) osteogenesis within poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) scaffolds. Scaffold pore size was controlled by porogen leaching of custom-made paraffin particles with three different size ranges: P200 (< 500 µm), P500 (500-1000 µm), and P1000 (1000-1500 µm). Scaffolds produced by leaching these particles exhibited highly interconnected pores and rough surface structures that were favorable for cell attachment and ingrowth. The osteogenic response of ASCs was evaluated following 3 weeks of in vitro culture using biochemical (ALP, Ca(2+)/DNA content), mechanical (compression test) and histological (H&amp;E and von Kossa staining) analyses. It was observed that while the total number of cells was similar for all scaffolds, the cell distributions and osteogenic properties were affected by the scaffold pore size. ASCs were able to bridge smaller pores and grow uniformly within these scaffolds (P200) while they grew as a layer along the periphery of the largest pores (P1000). The cell-biomaterial interactions specific to the latter case led to enhanced osteogenic responses. The ALP activity and Ca(2+) deposition were doubled in P1000 scaffolds as compared to P200 scaffolds. A significant difference was observed between the compressive strength of unseeded and seeded P1000 scaffolds. Therefore, we demonstrated that the use of scaffolds with pores that are in the range of 1 mm enhances in vitro ASC osteogenesis, which may improve their performance in engineered bone substitutes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24945873     DOI: 10.1088/1748-6041/9/4/045003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1748-6041            Impact factor:   3.715


  13 in total

1.  Multimaterial Dual Gradient Three-Dimensional Printing for Osteogenic Differentiation and Spatial Segregation.

Authors:  Brandon T Smith; Sean M Bittner; Emma Watson; Mollie M Smoak; Luis Diaz-Gomez; Eric R Molina; Yu Seon Kim; Carrigan D Hudgins; Anthony J Melchiorri; David W Scott; K Jane Grande-Allen; James J Yoo; Anthony Atala; John P Fisher; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 2.  Application of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells to the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Authors:  Cheng Wang; Yu Wang; Hao-Ye Meng; Xue-Ling Yuan; Xiao-Long Xu; Ai-Yuan Wang; Quan-Yi Guo; Jiang Peng; Shi-Bi Lu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-03-15

3.  Fabrication of a Cu/Zn co-incorporated calcium phosphate scaffold-derived GDF-5 sustained release system with enhanced angiogenesis and osteogenesis properties.

Authors:  Dongqin Xiao; Fei Yang; Qiao Zhao; Shixiao Chen; Feng Shi; Xiaocong Xiang; Li Deng; Xiao Sun; Jie Weng; Gang Feng
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 4.036

Review 4.  Coupling Osteogenesis and Vasculogenesis in Engineered Orthopedic Tissues.

Authors:  Nicholas G Schott; Nicole E Friend; Jan P Stegemann
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 7.376

5.  Cellularizing hydrogel-based scaffolds to repair bone tissue: How to create a physiologically relevant micro-environment?

Authors:  Mathieu Maisani; Daniele Pezzoli; Olivier Chassande; Diego Mantovani
Journal:  J Tissue Eng       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 7.813

Review 6.  3D Bone Biomimetic Scaffolds for Basic and Translational Studies with Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Authors:  Cristina Sobacchi; Marco Erreni; Dario Strina; Eleonora Palagano; Anna Villa; Ciro Menale
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Nano-Hydroxyapatite Bone Scaffolds with Different Porous Structures Processed by Digital Light Processing 3D Printing.

Authors:  Haowen Liang; Yue Wang; Shangsi Chen; Yang Liu; Zhengbai Liu; Jiaming Bai
Journal:  Int J Bioprint       Date:  2022-01-17

8.  Electrospun silk fibroin/poly(lactide-co-ε-caprolactone) nanofibrous scaffolds for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Zi Wang; Ming Lin; Qing Xie; Hao Sun; Yazhuo Huang; DanDan Zhang; Zhang Yu; Xiaoping Bi; Junzhao Chen; Jing Wang; Wodong Shi; Ping Gu; Xianqun Fan
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2016-04-11

9.  Production of Composite Scaffold Containing Silk Fibroin, Chitosan, and Gelatin for 3D Cell Culture and Bone Tissue Regeneration.

Authors:  Jianqing Li; Qiuke Wang; Yebo Gu; Yu Zhu; Liang Chen; Yunfeng Chen
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-11-08

Review 10.  Graphene Family Materials in Bone Tissue Regeneration: Perspectives and Challenges.

Authors:  Xinting Cheng; Qianbing Wan; Xibo Pei
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 4.703

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.