Literature DB >> 24945702

A new bankruptcy method for conflict resolution in water resources allocation.

Hojjat Mianabadi1, Erik Mostert2, Mahdi Zarghami3, Nick van de Giesen4.   

Abstract

Growing competition over water resources has caused political disputes among stakeholders and has brought conflict resolution in the focus of negotiation processes. In these cases, bankruptcy rules for redistributing an asset when it is not sufficient to meet all claims could be applied. In this paper, we develop a new bankruptcy rule for water resources problems that considers agents' contribution to the total resources as well as their claims, which is in accordance with the UN Watercourses Convention (1997), as important factors for reallocation. Using the Euphrates River and a hypothetical case from the literature as examples, the new rule is compared with four alternative rules. The results show that the novel solution is potentially more powerful to help solving conflicts over river sharing problems.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Bankruptcy theory; Conflict resolution; Euphrates River; Water resources allocation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24945702     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  1 in total

1.  Asymmetric Bargaining Model for Water Resource Allocation over Transboundary Rivers.

Authors:  Jianan Qin; Xiang Fu; Shaoming Peng; Yuni Xu; Jie Huang; Sha Huang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.390

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.