Literature DB >> 24945474

Computer navigation systems in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Rajesh Nair1, Gayatri Tripathy, Gaston R Deysine.   

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review to consolidate the body of knowledge about use of computer navigation systems in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), to determine whether these systems are useful in UKA, and to discuss the financial costs involved. We searched Medline (2002 to 2013) for articles in which results of navigated and conventional techniques were compared. In the navigated group, implant alignment was optimal in the desired angular range more often, and there were fewer outliers. However, the groups did not differ with respect to clinical knee scores, survival rates, or range of motion. Longer surgery in the navigation group could result in an increase in navigation-related complications. The lack of clear evidence of the usefulness of computer-assisted navigation systems in UKA has impeded universal acceptance of this technology in the orthopedic community. Definitive evidence can be generated only with large randomized studies with long-term follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24945474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)        ISSN: 1078-4519


  9 in total

1.  Is tibial cut navigation alone sufficient in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? Continuous series of fifty nine procedures.

Authors:  Thomas Gicquel; Jean Christophe Lambotte; Jean Louis Polard; Mickael Ropars; Denis Huten
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Navigated "small implants" in knee reconstruction.

Authors:  Norberto Confalonieri; Alessio Biazzo; Pietro Cerveri; Chris Pullen; Alfonso Manzotti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Current state of computer navigation and robotics in unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jelle P van der List; Harshvardhan Chawla; Leo Joskowicz; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Utilization and Short-Term Outcomes of Computer Navigation in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christopher N Carender; David E DeMik; Nicholas A Bedard; Alan G Shamrock; Qiang An; Timothy S Brown
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2020

5.  Have the Causes of Revision for Total and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties Changed During the Past Two Decades?

Authors:  Gro S Dyrhovden; Stein Håkon L Lygre; Mona Badawy; Øystein Gøthesen; Ove Furnes
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Superior alignment but no difference in clinical outcome after minimally invasive computer-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (MICA-UKA).

Authors:  Zhenxiang Zhang; Wei Zhu; Lixian Zhu; Yaqing Du
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  CORR Insights®: Valgus Correctability and Meniscal Extrusion Were Associated With Alignment After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthew S Hepinstall
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 4.755

8.  Navigated Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Different Perspective.

Authors:  Rajesh Malhotra; Saurabh Gupta; Vivek Gupta; Vikrant Manhas
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-04-29

9.  Pinless Navigation in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sarah Keuntje-Perka; Philipp von Roth; Michael Worlicek; Matthias Koch; Volker Alt; Moritz Kaiser
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 4.241

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.