| Literature DB >> 24944770 |
Kang Pa Lee1, Giftania Wardani Sudjarwo2, Ji-Su Kim1, Septrianto Dirgantara2, Won Jai Maeng3, Heeok Hong1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/Entities:
Keywords: Areca catechu; RAW 264.7 cell; anti-inflammation; carrageenan; lipopolysaccharide (LPS); paw edema
Year: 2014 PMID: 24944770 PMCID: PMC4058559 DOI: 10.4162/nrp.2014.8.3.267
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr Res Pract ISSN: 1976-1457 Impact factor: 1.926
Fig. 1Effect of (A) RAW 264.7 cells were treated with 0.3-10 µg/ml ACE for 24 h and cell viability was determined with the XTT assay. Values are expressed as a percentage of control. Each value represents the mean from three independent experiments ± SD. *indicates a significant difference compared with untreated controls (P < 0.05). (B) RAW 264.7 cells were treated with 0.3-3 µg/ml ACE and 1 µg/ml LPS for 24 h. NO production was determined with the Griess reagent assay. The values were determined and quantified from the sodium nitrate standard curve. The nitrate concentrations (µM) were determined in three independent experiments. Data were expressed as mean ± SD. *indicates a significant difference compared with LPS treatment only (P < 0.05).
Fig. 2Effect of (A) RAW 264.7 cells were treated with 0.3-3 µg/ml ACE and 1 µg/ml LPS for 24 h. The levels of iNOS, COX-2, IκB, and NF-κB proteins were examined by immunoblot analysis. (B-E) The graphs show the band intensity from each immunoblot with specific antibodies. Value changes from three independent experiments are expressed relative to those in LPS-treated controls. *indicates a significant difference compared with LPS only treatment (P < 0.05).
Fig. 3Effect of To test the effect of ACE (2.5, 5, or 10 mg/kg) on CR-induced paw edema, rats were divided into 4 groups. Water (control) and ACE (dissolved in 500 µl of normal saline) were administered orally during a 7-day regular schedule. To explore the anti-inflammatory effect of ACE in each group, 50 µl of 1% carrageenan was injected into the sub-plantar side of the hind paw of all animals. The paw edema volumes were recorded at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 h post-injection. Values are expressed as the increase in paw edema volume (%).