| Literature DB >> 24944587 |
Hakan Alakus1, Michele L Babicky2, Pradipta Ghosh3, Shawn Yost4, Kristen Jepsen5, Yang Dai5, Angelo Arias5, Michael L Samuels6, Evangeline S Mose2, Richard B Schwab3, Michael R Peterson7, Andrew M Lowy8, Kelly A Frazer9, Olivier Harismendy10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mucinous neoplasms of the appendix (MNA) are rare tumors which may progress from benign to malignant disease with an aggressive biological behavior. MNA is often diagnosed after metastasis to the peritoneal surfaces resulting in mucinous carcinomatosis peritonei (MCP). Genetic alterations in MNA are poorly characterized due to its low incidence, the hypo-cellularity of MCPs, and a lack of relevant pre-clinical models. As such, application of targeted therapies to this disease is limited to those developed for colorectal cancer and not based on molecular rationale.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24944587 PMCID: PMC4062050 DOI: 10.1186/gm559
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genome Med ISSN: 1756-994X Impact factor: 11.117
Genes recurrently mutated in MNA
| 10 | 1 | | Cancer Gene Census: pancreatic, colorectal, lung | ||
| 9 | 0.9 | 0.06 | Cancer Gene Census: pituitary tumors | ||
| 2 | 0.2 | 0.02 | | ||
| 2 | 0.2 | 0.02 | RET signaling | ||
| 2 | 0.2 | 0.02 | Homeobox TF neurogenesis | ||
| 2 | 0.2 | 0.02 | | ||
| 2 | 0.2 | 0.01 | Proto-oncogene of PTI1: Prost. Tumor Inducing 1 | ||
| 2 | 0.2 | 0.01 | | ||
| 2 | 0.2 | | TFGβ pathway | ||
| 2 | 0.2 | 0.02 | | ||
| 2 | 0.2 | 0.03 | | ||
| 2 | 0.2 | 0.02 | Receptor for EPH pathway | ||
| 2 | 0.2 | 0.03 | | ||
| 2 | 0.2 | 0.04 | Homologous to PTCH1: Shh receptor | ||
| 2 | 0.2 | 0.02 | | ||
| 2 | 0.2 | 0.05 | Intestinal tumor stem cell marker | ||
| 2 | 0.2 | 0.09 | Silenced in multiple epithelial cancers | ||
| 2 | 0.2 | 0.02 | | ||
| 2 | 0.2 | 0.02 | | ||
| 2 | 0.2 | 0.04 | | ||
| 2 | 0.2 | 0.08 | Mutated and silenced in GI cancer | ||
| 2 | 0.2 | 0.06 | Tumor suppressor in Gliomas | ||
| 2 | 0.2 | 0.09 | GATA factor involved in EMT in breast cancer | ||
| 2 | 0.2 | 0.06 | | ||
| 3 | 0.3 | | Putative receptor of Hippo pathway | ||
| 2 | 0.061 | NA | | |
| 2 | 0.067 | NA | | |
| 2 | 0.068 | NA | | |
| 2 | 0.089 | NA | | |
| 2 | 0.105 | NA | | |
| 2 | 0.261 | NA | | |
| 2 | 0.305 | NA | | |
| 2 | 0.659 | NA | | |
| 2 | 0.992 | NA |
aFalse recurrence rate (FRR) <0.05 are in bold.
bMutSig significant (P <0.01).
Figure 1Genome-wide copy number analysis. The log2 ratio of coverage between tumor and normal is indicated for all targeted exons (black dots) along each chromosome arranged in linear order (alternate grey/white shade). The inferred segments larger than 1 Mb are indicated as amplified (red) or deleted (blue). Loss of heterozygosity at germline SNVs is indicated by a dark blue tick at the bottom of each panel. The top nine panels correspond to low-grade MCPs and the bottom panel to high-grade MCP.
Figure 2The MNA mutational landscape. Samples from 19 MNA patients were assessed for histopathology and cellularity (a), analyzed for somatic mutations (Additional file 3: Tables S4 and S11) (b) or copy number aberrations (Additionalfile 3: Tables S7-S9) (c) as identified by exome sequencing using the discovery group (10 MCP samples - left side) or as validated by digital PCR and deep sequencing (19 samples - right side). (d) The levels of pErk, pAkt, and phosphorylated PKA substrates were measured by immunohistochemistry and determined to be positive based on signal strength and fraction of positive cells (Methods). (*) Only expected codons were investigated in the validation group. Low cellularity may impact the sensitivity of the validation.
Figure 3Immunohistochemistry. Normal appendix epithelium (a-d), low-grade MCP (e-h), high-grade MCP (i-l) samples were stained using H&E (a, e, i), anti-pErk staining (b, f, j), anti-pAkt staining (c, g, k), and Anti-phospho-PKA substrates (d, h, l) on matched adjacent sections.
Figure 4Frequent and complex interplay between and in MNAs. (a) High frequency of co-existing KRAS and GNAS mutations is uncommon in neoplastic lesions. Bar graphs represent the frequency of activating mutations in KRAS and GNAS oncogenes among various neoplasms reported in COSMIC (v63 database) or in IPMN [22] or MNA (this study). Only tissues with more than 10 evaluated samples are reported. (b) Simplified representation of the cross-talk between Ras and PKA pathway and the likely impact on MNA progression. Co-existing activating mutations in KRAS and GNAS can coordinately deregulate multiple oncogenic signaling pathways (Wnt, hedgehog, and TGFβ-SMAD) triggering initiation and progression of MNAs. Symbiotic (dark blue), synergistic (light blue), and antagonistic (dark red) signals triggered by mutations in GNAS and KRAS oncogenes, and possibly members of the TGFβ-SMAD pathway may all contribute to the metastatic progression of MNA.