Madalina Neacsu1, Claire Fyfe1, Graham Horgan1, Alexandra M Johnstone1. 1. From the Rowett Institute of Nutrition and Health, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom (MN, CF, and AMJ), and Biomathematics and Statistics Scotland, Aberdeen, United Kingdom (GH).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence with regard to the effect of different sources of protein on appetite during weight loss. Vegetarian and meat-based high-protein diets may have contrasting effects on appetite and biomarkers of protein-induced satiety. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to assess appetite response to meat or vegetarian high-protein weight-loss (HPWL) diets in obese men to monitor plasma amino acid profile and gut peptide response as potential satiety biomarkers. DESIGN:Twenty obese [body mass index (in kg/m²): 34.8] men participated in a dietary intervention study. After 3 d of a maintenance diet, they were provided in a crossover design with either a vegetarian HPWL (Soy-HPWL) or a meat-based HPWL (Meat-HPWL) diet for 2 wk. Both diets comprised 30% protein, 30% fat, and 40% carbohydrate, provided to measured resting metabolic rate. Body weight and the motivation to eat were measured daily. Plasma satiety biomarkers were collected during a test-meal challenge (5 h) at the end of each diet period. RESULTS: Over the 2 wk, subjects lost, on average, 2.41 and 2.27 kg with consumption of the Soy- and Meat-HPWL diets, respectively [P = 0.352; SE of the difference (SED): 0.1]. ANOVA confirmed that subjectively rated hunger (P = 0.569; SED: 3.8), fullness (P = 0.404; SED: 4.1), desire to eat (P = 0.356; SED: 3.7), preservation of lean body mass (P = 0.334; SED: 0.2), and loss of percentage fat mass (P = 0.179; SED: 0.2) did not differ between the 2 HPWL diets. There were differences in absolute concentrations of ghrelin and peptide YY between the 2 HPWL diets, although the response as net area under the curve was not different. CONCLUSIONS:Appetite control and weight loss were similar for both HPWL diets. Gut hormone profile was similar between the diets, which suggests that vegetarian diets can be as effective as meat-based diets for appetite control during weight loss.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence with regard to the effect of different sources of protein on appetite during weight loss. Vegetarian and meat-based high-protein diets may have contrasting effects on appetite and biomarkers of protein-induced satiety. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to assess appetite response to meat or vegetarian high-protein weight-loss (HPWL) diets in obesemen to monitor plasma amino acid profile and gut peptide response as potential satiety biomarkers. DESIGN: Twenty obese [body mass index (in kg/m²): 34.8] men participated in a dietary intervention study. After 3 d of a maintenance diet, they were provided in a crossover design with either a vegetarian HPWL (Soy-HPWL) or a meat-based HPWL (Meat-HPWL) diet for 2 wk. Both diets comprised 30% protein, 30% fat, and 40% carbohydrate, provided to measured resting metabolic rate. Body weight and the motivation to eat were measured daily. Plasma satiety biomarkers were collected during a test-meal challenge (5 h) at the end of each diet period. RESULTS: Over the 2 wk, subjects lost, on average, 2.41 and 2.27 kg with consumption of the Soy- and Meat-HPWL diets, respectively [P = 0.352; SE of the difference (SED): 0.1]. ANOVA confirmed that subjectively rated hunger (P = 0.569; SED: 3.8), fullness (P = 0.404; SED: 4.1), desire to eat (P = 0.356; SED: 3.7), preservation of lean body mass (P = 0.334; SED: 0.2), and loss of percentage fat mass (P = 0.179; SED: 0.2) did not differ between the 2 HPWL diets. There were differences in absolute concentrations of ghrelin and peptide YY between the 2 HPWL diets, although the response as net area under the curve was not different. CONCLUSIONS: Appetite control and weight loss were similar for both HPWL diets. Gut hormone profile was similar between the diets, which suggests that vegetarian diets can be as effective as meat-based diets for appetite control during weight loss.
Authors: Marlene D Kristensen; Nathalie T Bendsen; Sheena M Christensen; Arne Astrup; Anne Raben Journal: Food Nutr Res Date: 2016-10-19 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Marta Lonnie; Emma Hooker; Jeffrey M Brunstrom; Bernard M Corfe; Mark A Green; Anthony W Watson; Elizabeth A Williams; Emma J Stevenson; Simon Penson; Alexandra M Johnstone Journal: Nutrients Date: 2018-03-16 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Madalina Neacsu; Vassilios Raikos; Yara Benavides-Paz; Sylvia H Duncan; Gary J Duncan; James S Christie; Alexandra M Johnstone; Wendy R Russell Journal: Foods Date: 2020-04-03