Peter Kokkinos1, Charles Faselis2, Jonathan Myers3, Andreas Pittaras2, Xuemei Sui4, Jiajia Zhang5, Paul McAuley6, John Peter Kokkinos7. 1. Cardiology Department, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC; Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC; George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC. Electronic address: peter.kokkinos@va.gov. 2. Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC; George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC. 3. Cardiology Division, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA; Stanford University, Stanford, CA. 4. Department of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC. 5. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC. 6. Department of Human Performance and Sports Science, Winston-Salem State University, Winston-Salem, NC. 7. Department of Endocrinology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of fitness status on the paradoxical body mass index (BMI)-mortality risk association. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From February 1, 1986, through December 30, 2011, we assessed fitness and BMI in 18,033 male veterans (mean age, 58.4 ± 11.4 years) in 2 Veterans Affairs Medical centers. We established 3 fitness categories on the basis of peak metabolic equivalents achieved during an exercise test as well as 5 BMI categories. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: During the follow-up period (median, 10.8 years, comprising a total of 207,168 person-years), 5070 participants (28%) died. After adjusting for age, risk factors, muscle-wasting diseases, medications, and year of entry, mortality risk was higher for individuals with a BMI of 20.1 to 23.9 kg/m(2) (hazard ratio [HR], 1.21; 95% CI, 1.12-1.30) and 18.5 to 20.0 kg/m(2) (HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.37-1.77) than for those with a BMI of 24.0 to 27.9 kg/m(2); mortality risk was not increased for those with a BMI of 28.0 kg/m(2) or greater. When stratified by fitness, the trend was similar for low-fit and moderate-fit individuals. However, mortality risk was not increased for high-fit individuals across BMI categories. When fitness status was considered within each BMI category, mortality risk increased progressively with decreased fitness and was more pronounced for moderate-fit (HR, 2.52; 95% CI, 2.06-3.08) and low-fit (HR, 2.48; 95% CI, 2.0-3.06) individuals with a BMI of 18.5-20.0 kg/m(2). Mortality risk was not significantly increased for high-fit individuals (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.78-1.78; P=.45). CONCLUSION: A high mortality risk associated with low BMI levels was observed only in moderate-fit and low-fit individuals, and not in high-fit individuals. Thus, fitness greatly affects the paradoxical BMI-mortality risk association. Furthermore, our findings indicate that lower BMI levels do not increase the risk for premature death as long as they are associated with high fitness. Thus, the paradoxically higher mortality risk observed with lower body weight as represented by lower BMI is likely the result of unhealthy reduction in body weight and, perhaps most importantly, considerable loss of lean body mass.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of fitness status on the paradoxical body mass index (BMI)-mortality risk association. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From February 1, 1986, through December 30, 2011, we assessed fitness and BMI in 18,033 male veterans (mean age, 58.4 ± 11.4 years) in 2 Veterans Affairs Medical centers. We established 3 fitness categories on the basis of peak metabolic equivalents achieved during an exercise test as well as 5 BMI categories. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: During the follow-up period (median, 10.8 years, comprising a total of 207,168 person-years), 5070 participants (28%) died. After adjusting for age, risk factors, muscle-wasting diseases, medications, and year of entry, mortality risk was higher for individuals with a BMI of 20.1 to 23.9 kg/m(2) (hazard ratio [HR], 1.21; 95% CI, 1.12-1.30) and 18.5 to 20.0 kg/m(2) (HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.37-1.77) than for those with a BMI of 24.0 to 27.9 kg/m(2); mortality risk was not increased for those with a BMI of 28.0 kg/m(2) or greater. When stratified by fitness, the trend was similar for low-fit and moderate-fit individuals. However, mortality risk was not increased for high-fit individuals across BMI categories. When fitness status was considered within each BMI category, mortality risk increased progressively with decreased fitness and was more pronounced for moderate-fit (HR, 2.52; 95% CI, 2.06-3.08) and low-fit (HR, 2.48; 95% CI, 2.0-3.06) individuals with a BMI of 18.5-20.0 kg/m(2). Mortality risk was not significantly increased for high-fit individuals (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.78-1.78; P=.45). CONCLUSION: A high mortality risk associated with low BMI levels was observed only in moderate-fit and low-fit individuals, and not in high-fit individuals. Thus, fitness greatly affects the paradoxical BMI-mortality risk association. Furthermore, our findings indicate that lower BMI levels do not increase the risk for premature death as long as they are associated with high fitness. Thus, the paradoxically higher mortality risk observed with lower body weight as represented by lower BMI is likely the result of unhealthy reduction in body weight and, perhaps most importantly, considerable loss of lean body mass.
Authors: Shirit Kamil-Rosenberg; Peter Kokkinos; Christina Grune de Souza E Silva; Win Leth Shwe Yee; Joshua Abella; Khin Chan; Jonathan Myers Journal: Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Date: 2020-10-27
Authors: Tara L MacDonald; Pattarawan Pattamaprapanont; Prerana Pathak; Natalie Fernandez; Ellen C Freitas; Samar Hafida; Joanna Mitri; Steven L Britton; Lauren G Koch; Sarah J Lessard Journal: Nat Metab Date: 2020-07-20
Authors: Sankar D Navaneethan; Jesse D Schold; Susana Arrigain; John P Kirwan; Joseph V Nally Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2016-01-12 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Jakob Tarp; Anders Grøntved; Miguel A Sanchez-Lastra; Knut Eirik Dalene; Ding Ding; Ulf Ekelund Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2021-03-13 Impact factor: 5.501