Literature DB >> 24943693

Imaging Pandora's Box: incidental findings in elderly patients evaluated for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Nicholas M Orme1, Thomas C Wright2, Gil E Harmon2, Vuyisile T Nkomo1, Eric E Williamson3, Paul Sorajja4, Thomas A Foley3, Kevin L Greason5, Rakesh M Suri5, Charanjit S Rihal1, Phillip M Young6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency and clinical impact of noncardiovascular incidental findings (IFs) detected on preoperative computed tomographic angiography (CTA) of the chest/abdomen/pelvis performed in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis being considered for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The CTA studies for 424 consecutive patients being evaluated for TAVR between January 1, 2009, through January 24, 2012, were reviewed for noncardiovascular IFs (62.0% male; median ± SD age, 82 ± 8.3 years). The electronic medical record was reviewed to assess for subsequent clinical management and survival.
RESULTS: Potentially pathologic IFs (PPIFs) were present in 285 patients (67.2%). The mean ± SD number of PPIFs per patient was 1.1 ± 1.0 (range, 0-4). Factors associated with higher numbers of PPIFs were reduced ejection fraction (P=.02) and history of smoking (P=.06). Potentially pathologic incidental findings prompted clinical work-up in 39 patients (9.2%) and delayed or canceled treatment plans for aortic stenosis in 7 patients (1.7%). The number needed to image to diagnose a new malignancy or medical condition was 19. The number of PPIFs was predictive of poor overall survival before (hazard ratio, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.31-1.88) and after (hazard ratio, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.19-1.76) adjustment for baseline clinical variables (P<.001 for both).
CONCLUSION: This investigation found that PPIFs are common in elderly patients undergoing TAVR-CTA scans and, once discovered, commonly generate further clinical evaluation. Higher numbers of PPIFs may be predictive of poorer survival, but further study is required to guide the appropriateness of pursuing diagnostic evaluations for asymptomatic PPIFs in this elderly population.
Copyright © 2014 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24943693     DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.03.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  4 in total

Review 1.  Frequency and impact of incidental findings on computed tomography during work-up for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: single centre experience and review of the literature.

Authors:  Jonathan Hinton; Sam Gough; Hanad Ahmed; Lavinia Gabara; John Rawlins; Alison Calver; Benoy N Shah; Dhrubo Rakhit; James Shambrook; Stephen Harden; Charles Peebles; Ausami Abbas; Nick Curzen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Classification of Suncus murinus species complex (Soricidae: Crocidurinae) in Peninsular Malaysia using image analysis and machine learning approaches.

Authors:  Arpah Abu; Lee Kien Leow; Rosli Ramli; Hasmahzaiti Omar
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Prevalence and Clinical Impact of Incidental Findings on Preoperative 3D Planning Computed Tomography for Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yuqing Chen; Sarav S Shah; Alexander M Roche; Lambert T Li; Matthew Chilton; Benjamin Saks; Meghan Macaskill; Glen Ross
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2022-08-05

4.  Incidental abnormal CT scan findings during transcatheter aortic valve implantation assessment: incidence and implications.

Authors:  Akshay Patel; Kajan Mahendran; Michael Collins; Mahmoud Abdelaziz; Saib Khogali; Heyman Luckraz
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2018-08-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.