Literature DB >> 24943378

Collision avoidance during group evasive manoeuvres: a comparison of real versus simulated swarms with manipulated vision and surface wave detectors.

William L Romey1, Magenta M Miller2, Jose M Vidal3.   

Abstract

Coordinated group motion has been studied extensively both in real systems (flocks, swarms and schools) and in simulations (self-propelled particle (SPP) models using attraction and repulsion rules). Rarely are attraction and repulsion rules manipulated, and the resulting emergent behaviours of real and simulation systems are compared. We compare swarms of sensory-deprived whirligig beetles with matching simulation models. Whirligigs live at the water's surface and coordinate their grouping using their eyes and antennae. We filmed groups of beetles in which antennae or eyes had been unilaterally obstructed and measured individual and group behaviours. We then developed and compared eight SPP simulation models. Eye-less beetles formed larger diameter resting groups than antenna-less or control groups. Antenna-less groups collided more often with each other during evasive group movements than did eye-less or control groups. Simulations of antenna-less individuals produced no difference from a control (or a slight decrease) in group diameter. Simulations of eye-less individuals produced an increase in group diameter. Our study is important in (i) differentiating between group attraction and repulsion rules, (ii) directly comparing emergent properties of real and simulated groups, and (iii) exploring a new sensory modality (surface wave detection) to coordinate group movement.
© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  collective behaviour; collision avoidance; grouping simulation; self-propelled particle model; surface wave detection

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24943378      PMCID: PMC4083796          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  4 in total

1.  Uninformed individuals promote democratic consensus in animal groups.

Authors:  Iain D Couzin; Christos C Ioannou; Güven Demirel; Thilo Gross; Colin J Torney; Andrew Hartnett; Larissa Conradt; Simon A Levin; Naomi E Leonard
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Collision avoidance by running insects: antennal guidance in cockroaches.

Authors:  Yoshichika Baba; Akira Tsukada; Christopher M Comer
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move.

Authors:  Iain D Couzin; Jens Krause; Nigel R Franks; Simon A Levin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-02-03       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Collective motion and cannibalism in locust migratory bands.

Authors:  Sepideh Bazazi; Jerome Buhl; Joseph J Hale; Michael L Anstey; Gregory A Sword; Stephen J Simpson; Iain D Couzin
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 10.834

  4 in total
  3 in total

1.  The New World whirligig beetles of the genus Dineutus Macleay, 1825 (Coleoptera, Gyrinidae, Gyrininae, Dineutini).

Authors:  Grey T Gustafson; Kelly B Miller
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 1.546

Review 2.  Understanding how animal groups achieve coordinated movement.

Authors:  J E Herbert-Read
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Flash Expansion Threshold in Whirligig Swarms.

Authors:  William L Romey; Alicia R Lamb
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.