Literature DB >> 24943293

Negative surveillance endoscopy occurs frequently in patients with short-segment non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus.

J Melson1, V Desai1, M Greenspan1, S Yau1, M Abdalla1, R Dhanekula1, S Mobarhan1, D Shapiro1, J Losurdo1, S Jakate1.   

Abstract

Surveillance endoscopy of non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (NDBE) that fails to detect intestinal metaplasia (IM), or negative surveillance, is known to occur in clinical practice, although the frequency and possible outcomes in a large cohort in clinical practice is not well described. The goals of this study were to define frequency in which negative surveillance occurs and endoscopic outcomes in a screening cohort of short segment NDBE. A retrospective cohort (n = 184) of patients newly diagnosed with short segment NDBE at an outpatient academic tertiary care center between 2003 and 2011 were reviewed. Only those with one or more surveillance endoscopies were included to define a frequency of negative surveillance. Included patients were further assessed if they had two or more surveillance endoscopies and were classified into groups as sampling error or negative IM on consecutive surveillances based on the results of their surveillance endoscopies. The frequency of a negative surveillance endoscopy in all short-segment NDBE patients was 19.66% (92 endoscopic exams were negative for IM of 468 total surveillance exams). A negative surveillance endoscopy occurred in 40.76% (n = 75) patients. Sampling error occurred in 44.12% and negative IM on consecutive surveillance endoscopies in 55.88% of those with ≥ 2 surveillance endoscopies and an initially negative surveillance exam. The frequency of negative IM on consecutive surveillances was 19.00% of all patients who had two surveillance endoscopies. When the index diagnostic Barrett's esophagus segment length was < 1 cm, 32.14% (18/56) of all patients (with ≥ 2 surveillance endoscopies) had negative IM on consecutive surveillance endoscopies. Negative surveillance occurs frequently in short-segment NDBE. When an initial negative surveillance endoscopy occurs, it may be due to either a sampling error or lack of detectable IM on surveillance exam. When a <1 cm segment of NDBE is diagnosed, a significant proportion of patients may go on to have continuously undetected IM on consecutive surveillance endoscopic exams without intervention.
© 2014 International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barrett's esophagus; esophagogastroduodenoscopy; screening

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24943293     DOI: 10.1111/dote.12250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  4 in total

1.  Automated segmentation and characterization of esophageal wall in vivo by tethered capsule optical coherence tomography endomicroscopy.

Authors:  Giovanni J Ughi; Michalina J Gora; Anne-Fré Swager; Amna Soomro; Catriona Grant; Aubrey Tiernan; Mireille Rosenberg; Jenny S Sauk; Norman S Nishioka; Guillermo J Tearney
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Detection of palisade vessels as a landmark for Barrett's esophagus in a Western population.

Authors:  Dirk W Schölvinck; Osamu Goto; Cornelis A Seldenrijk; Raf Bisschops; Joichiro Horii; Yasutoshi Ochiai; Erik J Schoon; Boudewijn E Schenk; Toshio Uraoka; Martijn G H van Oijen; Jacques J G H M Bergman; Naohisa Yahagi; Bas L A M Weusten
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 7.527

3.  Surveillance in Barrett esophagus.

Authors:  C Gindea; R Birla; P Hoara; A Caragui; S Constantinoiu
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2014

4.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis on Endoscopic Surveillance Among Western Patients With Barrett's Esophagus for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Screening.

Authors:  Yu Yang; Hai-Ning Chen; Rui Wang; Yun-Jing Tang; Xin-Zu Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.889

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.