Literature DB >> 24942746

Effects of synchronisation during SiPAP-generated nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in preterm infants.

L S Owen1, C J Morley2, P G Davis1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The SiPAP flow driver (Care Fusion, Dublin, Ohio, USA) offers synchronised nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (sNIPPV) using an abdominal capsule. This study aims to describe the accuracy and effects of synchronised NIPPV using SiPAP in preterm infants.
DESIGN: Ten infants, born <28 weeks' gestation, receiving synchronised SiPAP-generated NIPPV, in 'biphasic trigger' mode, were observed. Abdominal capsule signals, delivered pressures, respiratory pattern and oxygen saturations were recorded. Tidal volume (VT), apnoeas, proportion of breaths supported by SiPAP and time between inspiration onset and SiPAP pressure rise were analysed.
RESULTS: Infants were of median 26(+0) weeks' gestational age and birth weight 776 g. Mean (SD) respiratory rate (RR) was 53 (14)/min. 82% (17) of spontaneous breaths triggered a SiPAP pressure peak. Mean time between inspiration and SiPAP pressure rise was 28 (20) ms. There was no difference in VT when breaths triggered a SiPAP pressure peak compared with breaths without a pressure peak. No VT was generated by pressure peaks delivered during apnoea. Capsule signals were not recognised following >10% of breaths, resulting in asynchronous NIPPV delivery. Movements resulted in irregular SiPAP pressures and desaturation. When the RR was faster, >55/min, breaths irregularly triggered a SiPAP pressure peak (p=0.003). Compared with times when every breath resulted in a pressure peak, lower mean pressures were achieved, 7.9 vs 8.4 cm H2O (p=0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: The SiPAP synchronisation system triggered rapidly with most spontaneous breaths, but did not result in larger tidal volumes. When the RR was >55/min, the SiPAP delivered fewer pressure peaks at lower pressures. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Neonatology; Respiratory

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24942746     DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-305830

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed        ISSN: 1359-2998            Impact factor:   5.747


  5 in total

Review 1.  Cardiorespiratory events in preterm infants: interventions and consequences.

Authors:  J M Di Fiore; C F Poets; E Gauda; R J Martin; P MacFarlane
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  Noninvasive Ventilation for Preterm Twin Neonates with Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Long Chen; Li Wang; Jie Li; Nan Wang; Yuan Shi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Non-invasive Respiratory Support of the Premature Neonate: From Physics to Bench to Practice.

Authors:  Ibrahim Sammour; Sreenivas Karnati
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 3.418

Review 4.  Current insights in non-invasive ventilation for the treatment of neonatal respiratory disease.

Authors:  Dhivya Lakshmi Permall; Asfia Banu Pasha; Xiao-Qing Chen
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 2.638

5.  Non-invasive High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation as Initial Respiratory Support for Preterm Infants With Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Authors:  Shu-Hua Lai; Ying-Ling Xie; Zhi-Qing Chen; Rong Chen; Wen-Hong Cai; Luo-Cheng Wu; Yun-Feng Lin; Yi-Rong Zheng
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 3.418

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.