Literature DB >> 24942381

The estimated frequency of antiphospholipid antibodies in young adults with cerebrovascular events: a systematic review.

Savino Sciascia1, Giovanni Sanna2, Munther A Khamashta3, Maria Jose Cuadrado2, Doruk Erkan4, Laura Andreoli5, Maria Laura Bertolaccini6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Around 10% of all thrombotic cerebrovascular events (CVE) occur in young population and in a large proportion of those the trigger remains undetermined. Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are recognised risk factors for ischaemic stroke and recurrent thrombotic events; however, the frequency of aPL in young people with CVE is still an unresolved issue.
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the frequency of aPL in young adults with CVE and to determine whether aPL-positive young individuals are at greater risk of CVE when compared with individuals without aPL by systematically reviewing the literature.
METHODS: Medline reports published between 1970 and 2013 investigating the presence of aPL in young patients (<50 years old) with CVE were included. The median frequency for positive aPL, including lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and antibodies against β2Glycoprotein I (anti-β2GPI), was calculated for stroke and transient ischaemic attacks.
FINDINGS: This systematic review is based on available data from 5217 patients and controls from 43 studies analysing the frequency of aPL in young patients with CVE. The overall aPL frequency was estimated as 17.4% (range 5%-56%) for any CVE, 17.2% (range 2%-56%) for stroke and 11.7% (range 2%-45%) for transient ischaemic attack (TIA). The presence of aPL increased the risk for CVE by 5.48-fold (95% CI 4.42 to 6.79). Based on available data, the frequency of aPL in young patients with CVE can be estimated at 17%, rising up to 22% for aCL in patients with stroke. The presence of aPL seems to confer a fivefold higher risk for stroke or TIA when compared with controls. However, variability in test reproducibility and cut-off definition still represent an important methodological limitation for the current diagnostic testing for aPL. These observations should be confirmed by appropriately designed population studies. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anticardiolipin Antibodies; Antiphospholipid Antibodies; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Autoimmune Diseases

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24942381     DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205663

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  25 in total

1.  Comparison of patients with transient and sustained increments of antiphospholipid antibodies after acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Jun Sang Yoo; Young Seo Kim; Hyun Young Kim; Hyuk Sung Kwon; Seong-Ho Koh; Sung Hyuk Heo; Bum Joon Kim; Cheryl D Bushnell; Dae-Il Chang
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 2.  Thrombosis and Anti-phospholipid Syndrome: a 5-Year Update on Treatment.

Authors:  Cecilia Beatrice Chighizola; Pier Luigi Meroni
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 4.592

3.  Spontaneous cervical artery dissection is accompanied by a hypercoagulable state and simultaneous inflammatory condition.

Authors:  Johann Otto Pelz; Kristian Harms; Michael Metze; Dominik Michalski
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2017-12-09       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 4.  AntiPhospholipid Syndrome Alliance for Clinical Trials and InternatiOnal Networking (APS ACTION): 5-Year Update.

Authors:  Medha Barbhaiya; Danieli Andrade; Doruk Erkan
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.592

5.  Antiphospholipid Antibodies and the Antiphospholipid Syndrome: From Coagulation to the Clinic.

Authors:  Rita Selby; Jameel Abdulrehman
Journal:  J Appl Lab Med       Date:  2022-01-05

Review 6.  Neurologic Manifestations of Catastrophic Antiphospholipid Syndrome.

Authors:  Rafid Mustafa
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 6.030

Review 7.  Diagnosing antiphospholipid syndrome: 'extra-criteria' manifestations and technical advances.

Authors:  Savino Sciascia; Mary-Carmen Amigo; Dario Roccatello; Munther Khamashta
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 20.543

8.  Infodemiology of antiphospholipid syndrome: Merging informatics and epidemiology.

Authors:  Savinio Sciascia; Massimo Radin; Ozan Unlu; Doruk Erkan; Dario Roccatello
Journal:  Eur J Rheumatol       Date:  2018-01-22

Review 9.  Primary Thrombosis Prophylaxis in Persistently Antiphospholipid Antibody-Positive Individuals: Where Do We Stand in 2018?

Authors:  Yu Zuo; Medha Barbhaiya; Doruk Erkan
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 10.  Neurologic Manifestations of the Antiphospholipid Syndrome - an Update.

Authors:  Miguel Leal Rato; Matilde Bandeira; Vasco C Romão; Diana Aguiar de Sousa
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 5.081

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.