Literature DB >> 24942260

Comprehensive pathological analyses in lung squamous cell carcinoma: single cell invasion, nuclear diameter, and tumor budding are independent prognostic factors for worse outcomes.

Kyuichi Kadota1, Jun-Ichi Nitadori, Kaitlin M Woo, Camelia S Sima, David J Finley, Valerie W Rusch, Prasad S Adusumilli, William D Travis.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: For lung squamous cell carcinomas, there are no pathological findings that have been universally accepted as prognostic factors, with the exception of pathological stage. Tumor budding and nuclear grade have been recognized as a poor prognostic factor in other carcinomas. In this study, we investigated whether pathological findings could determine prognosis in lung squamous cell carcinomas.
METHODS: All available tumor slides from patients with surgically resected, solitary lung squamous cell carcinomas (1999-2009) were reviewed (n = 485; stage I/II/III, 281/136/68). Tumors were evaluated for differentiation, subtypes (keratinizing, nonkeratinizing, basaloid pattern, papillary growth, and clear cell feature), tumor nest size (tumor budding and single cell invasion), and nuclear grade (nuclear diameter and mitosis). Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method (stratified by pathological stage), and group differences were investigated using the stratified log-rank test and the Cox proportional hazards model.
RESULTS: OS was significantly decreased in patients with versus without single cell invasion (p = 0.002 for the entire tumor and p = 0.001 for tumor edge), with large versus small nuclei (p = 0.011), and with high versus low grade tumor budding (p < 0.001 for maximum and p = 0.007 for total). In multivariate analyses, single cell invasion (hazard ratio [HR], 1.47-1.49), nuclear diameter (HR, 1.09-1.33), and tumor budding (HR, 1.04) were independent prognostic factors of OS. However, histologic subtyping including keratinizing, nonkeratinizing, basaloid, and clear cell subtypes did not show prognostic significance.
CONCLUSIONS: Pathological factors can help stratify prognosis in patients with lung squamous cell carcinomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24942260      PMCID: PMC4806792          DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Oncol        ISSN: 1556-0864            Impact factor:   15.609


  49 in total

1.  The use and interpretation of competing risks regression models.

Authors:  James J Dignam; Qiang Zhang; Masha Kocherginsky
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Prognostic values of stromal proportion and PCNA, Ki-67, and p53 proteins in patients with resected adenocarcinoma of the lung.

Authors:  L M Demarchi; M M Reis; S A Palomino; C Farhat; T Y Takagaki; R Beyruti; P H Saldiva; V L Capelozzi
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  A nuclear grading system is a strong predictor of survival in epitheloid diffuse malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Kyuichi Kadota; Kei Suzuki; Christos Colovos; Camelia S Sima; Valerie W Rusch; William D Travis; Prasad S Adusumilli
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 7.842

4.  Categorizing a prognostic variable: review of methods, code for easy implementation and applications to decision-making about cancer treatments.

Authors:  M Mazumdar; J R Glassman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  The novel histologic International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society classification system of lung adenocarcinoma is a stage-independent predictor of survival.

Authors:  Arne Warth; Thomas Muley; Michael Meister; Albrecht Stenzinger; Michael Thomas; Peter Schirmacher; Philipp A Schnabel; Jan Budczies; Hans Hoffmann; Wilko Weichert
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Diagnostic yield of fiberoptic bronchoscopy in evaluating solitary pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  W A Baaklini; M A Reinoso; A B Gorin; A Sharafkaneh; P Manian
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Basaloid carcinoma of the lung: a really dismal histologic variant?

Authors:  Dae Joon Kim; Kil Dong Kim; Dong Hwan Shin; Jae Y Ro; Kyung Young Chung
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Exophytic endobronchial epidermoid carcinoma.

Authors:  E Dulmet-Brender; F Jaubert; G Huchon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1986-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Risk of recurrence in patients with surgically resected stage I non-small cell lung carcinoma: histopathologic and immunohistochemical analysis.

Authors:  Claudia Poleri; José Luis Morero; Beatriz Nieva; María Fernanda Vázquez; Cristina Rodríguez; Ernesto de Titto; Moisés Rosenberg
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 10.  The new World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology (WHO/ISUP) classification for TA, T1 bladder tumors: is it an improvement?

Authors:  Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.312

View more
  33 in total

Review 1.  [Lung cancer. Developments, concepts and preview of the new WHO classification].

Authors:  I Petersen; A Warth
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  Reevaluation and reclassification of resected lung carcinomas originally diagnosed as squamous cell carcinoma using immunohistochemical analysis.

Authors:  Kyuichi Kadota; Jun-ichi Nitadori; Natasha Rekhtman; David R Jones; Prasad S Adusumilli; William D Travis
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 3.  [Grading of lung cancer].

Authors:  R M Bohle; P A Schnabel
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 4.  [The new TNM classification for lung tumors : Changes and the assessment of multiple tumor foci].

Authors:  A Harms; M Kriegsmann; L Fink; F Länger; A Warth
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.011

5.  FGFR1 gene amplification in squamous cell carcinomas of the lung: a potential favorable prognostic marker for women and for patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Fidelis Andrea Flockerzi; Cristiana Roggia; Frank Langer; Bernd Holleczek; Rainer M Bohle
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Spread through air spaces (STAS) is a predictor of poor outcome in atypical carcinoids of the lung.

Authors:  Serdar Altinay; Jasna Metovic; Federica Massa; Gaia Gatti; Paola Cassoni; Giorgio Vittorio Scagliotti; Marco Volante; Mauro Papotti
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  Spread through air spaces (STAS): prognostic impact of a semi-quantitative assessment.

Authors:  Arne Warth
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Evaluation of the budding and depth of invasion (BD) model in oral tongue cancer biopsies.

Authors:  Alhadi Almangush; Ilmo Leivo; Maria Siponen; Elias Sundquist; Rayan Mroueh; Antti A Mäkitie; Ylermi Soini; Caj Haglund; Pentti Nieminen; Tuula Salo
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 4.064

9.  Spread through Air Spaces (STAS) Is an Independent Predictor of Recurrence and Lung Cancer-Specific Death in Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Shaohua Lu; Kay See Tan; Kyuichi Kadota; Takashi Eguchi; Sarina Bains; Natasha Rekhtman; Prasad S Adusumilli; William D Travis
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 15.609

Review 10.  Spread through air spaces (STAS): a comprehensive update.

Authors:  Arne Warth
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2017-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.