Literature DB >> 24942124

[Essential aspects of ophthalmological expert assessment in private accident insurance].

F Tost1.   

Abstract

Commissions for an expert assessment place basically high demands on commissioned eye specialists because this activity differs from the normal routine field of work. In addition to assessing objective symptoms and subjective symptomatics in a special analytical manner, eye specialists are expected to have knowledge of basic legal terminology, such as proximate cause, evidence and evidential value. Only under these prerequisites can an ophthalmologist fulfill the function of an expert with a high level of quality and adequately adjust the special medical ophthalmological expertise to the requirements of the predominantly legally based clients commissioning the report and oriented to the appropriate valid legal norms. Particularly common difficulties associated with making an ophthalmological expert report for private accident insurance, e.g. determination of the reduction in functional quality, consideration of partial causality and assessment of diplopia are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24942124     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-014-3078-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  6 in total

1.  [References for expert assessment in ophthalmology. Causality and finality].

Authors:  B Gramberg-Danielsen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  [Proposed scoring system for assessment of functional impairment due to visual field defects].

Authors:  J Weber; U Schiefer; G Kolling
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 3.  [Legal aspects of ophthalmological expert assessment].

Authors:  F Tost; C Gass
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 0.700

Review 4.  [Legal aspects in ophthalmological expert assessment: part I].

Authors:  F Tost; C Gass
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 0.700

5.  Grid for scoring visual fields. II. Perimeter.

Authors:  B Esterman
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1968-04

6.  [Reflections on expert assessment of double vision and forced head position].

Authors:  G H Kolling
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 0.700

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.