Literature DB >> 24941983

Female fertility preservation in cancer patients: an instrumental tool for the envisioning a postdisease life.

Rachel Trèves1, Michaël Grynberg, Soizic le Parco, Astrid Finet, Marine Poulain, Renato Fanchin.   

Abstract

AIM: To verify whether fertility preservation (FP) improves the way women contemplate their life after the disease. MATERIALS &
METHODS: 285 cancer patients referred for FP counseling were prospectively studied. A standardized questionnaire was submitted to all participants.
RESULTS: A total of 85 patients (39.0%) returned the questionnaire. None of the women who rejected the FP proposal after oncofertility counseling returned the questionnaire. The median age of responders was 29.1 years (range: 18-40 years). In total, 35 of them (41.1%) were single and 72 (84.7%) were childless. A total of 66 women (77.6%) reported that the possibility of preserving fertility was instrumental to improving their coping with the burden of treatments. Since 61.2% patients perceived their cryopreserved oocytes or embryos as future children or family, the projection in a postdisease life may be at play in this improved subjective experience of treatment.
CONCLUSION: The present results indicate that the simple fact of undergoing FP improves the patients' subjective experience of cancer treatments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; embryo cryopreservation; fertility preservation; oocyte cryopreservation; psychology

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24941983     DOI: 10.2217/fon.13.265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Future Oncol        ISSN: 1479-6694            Impact factor:   3.404


  7 in total

1.  Oocyte cryopreservation for women with GATA2 deficiency.

Authors:  Jessica R Zolton; Toral P Parikh; Dennis D Hickstein; Steven M Holland; Micah J Hill; Alan H DeCherney; Erin F Wolff
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Occurrence and recall rates of fertility discussions with young breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Rahul Banerjee; Ekaterini Tsiapali
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Fertility counseling before cancer treatment and subsequent reproductive concerns among female adolescent and young adult cancer survivors.

Authors:  Katie Young; Ksenya Shliakhtsitsava; Loki Natarajan; Emily Myers; Andrew C Dietz; Jessica R Gorman; María Elena Martínez; Brian W Whitcomb; H Irene Su
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Challenges and considerations in optimizing ovarian stimulation protocols in oncofertility patients.

Authors:  Kathryn Coyne; MacKenzie Purdy; Kathleen O'Leary; Jerome L Yaklic; Steven R Lindheim; Leslie A Appiah
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2014-12-05

5.  Fertility preservation in female cancer patients: a single center experience.

Authors:  Cristina Sigismondi; Enrico Papaleo; Paola Viganò; Simona Vailati; Massimo Candiani; Jessica Ottolina; Valentina E Di Mattei; Giorgia Mangili
Journal:  Chin J Cancer       Date:  2015-01

6.  Fertility preservation in Hong Kong Chinese society: awareness, knowledge and acceptance.

Authors:  Suet Ying Yeung; Elaine Yee Lee Ng; Terence Tzu Hsi Lao; Tin Chiu Li; Jacqueline Pui Wah Chung
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 2.809

7.  Does a web-based decision aid improve informed choice for fertility preservation in women with breast cancer (DECISIF)? Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Alexandra Benoit; Michael Grynberg; Rémy Morello; Nathalie Sermondade; Guillaume Grandazzi; Grégoire Moutel
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.