Erica L Kenney1, Catherine M Giles2, Madeleine E deBlois2, Steven L Gortmaker2, Sherene Chinfatt2, Angie L Cradock2. 1. Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02215, USA. Electronic address: ekenney@hsph.harvard.edu. 2. Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:Afterschool programs can be health-promoting environments for children. Written policies positively influence nutrition and physical activity (PA) environments, but effective strategies for building staff capacity to write such policies have not been evaluated. This study measures the comprehensiveness of written nutrition, PA, and screen time policies in afterschool programs and assesses impact of the Out of School Nutrition and Physical Activity (OSNAP) intervention on key policies. METHODS:Twenty afterschool programs in Boston, MA participated in a group-randomized, controlled trial from September 2010 to June 2011. Intervention program staff attended learning collaboratives focused on practice and policy change. The Out-of-School Time (OST) Policy Assessment Index evaluated written policies. Inter-rater reliability and construct validity of the measure and impact of the intervention on written policies were assessed. RESULTS: The measure demonstrated moderate to excellent inter-rater reliability (Spearman's r=0.53 to 0.97) and construct validity. OSNAP was associated with significant increases in standards-based policy statements surrounding snacks (+2.6, p=0.003), beverages (+2.3, p=0.008), screen time (+0.8, p=0.046), family communication (+2.2, p=0.002), and a summary index of OSNAP goals (+3.3, p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS:OSNAP demonstrated success in building staff capacity to write health-promoting policy statements. Future research should focus on determining policy change impact on practices.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Afterschool programs can be health-promoting environments for children. Written policies positively influence nutrition and physical activity (PA) environments, but effective strategies for building staff capacity to write such policies have not been evaluated. This study measures the comprehensiveness of written nutrition, PA, and screen time policies in afterschool programs and assesses impact of the Out of School Nutrition and Physical Activity (OSNAP) intervention on key policies. METHODS: Twenty afterschool programs in Boston, MA participated in a group-randomized, controlled trial from September 2010 to June 2011. Intervention program staff attended learning collaboratives focused on practice and policy change. The Out-of-School Time (OST) Policy Assessment Index evaluated written policies. Inter-rater reliability and construct validity of the measure and impact of the intervention on written policies were assessed. RESULTS: The measure demonstrated moderate to excellent inter-rater reliability (Spearman's r=0.53 to 0.97) and construct validity. OSNAP was associated with significant increases in standards-based policy statements surrounding snacks (+2.6, p=0.003), beverages (+2.3, p=0.008), screen time (+0.8, p=0.046), family communication (+2.2, p=0.002), and a summary index of OSNAP goals (+3.3, p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: OSNAP demonstrated success in building staff capacity to write health-promoting policy statements. Future research should focus on determining policy change impact on practices.
Keywords:
Capacity building; Child health; Health policy; Nutrition policy; Physical activity; Program development; Program evaluation; Randomized controlled trial; School health promotion
Authors: Steve Kelder; Deanna M Hoelscher; Cristina S Barroso; Joey L Walker; Peter Cribb; Shaohua Hu Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Rebecca S Mozaffarian; Jean L Wiecha; Barbara A Roth; Toben F Nelson; Rebekka M Lee; Steven L Gortmaker Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2009-10-15 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: David A Dzewaltowski; Richard R Rosenkranz; Karly S Geller; Karen J Coleman; Gregory J Welk; Tanis J Hastmann; George A Milliken Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2010-12-13 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Angie L Cradock; Anne McHugh; Helen Mont-Ferguson; Linda Grant; Jessica L Barrett; Y Claire Wang; Steven L Gortmaker Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2011-06-15 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Sara E Benjamin; Brian Neelon; Sarah C Ball; Shrikant I Bangdiwala; Alice S Ammerman; Dianne S Ward Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2007-07-05 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Rosa Virgara; Anna Phillips; Lucy K Lewis; Katherine Baldock; Luke Wolfenden; Ty Ferguson; Mandy Richardson; Anthony Okely; Michael Beets; Carol Maher Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-09-27
Authors: Christina D Economos; Stephanie Anzman-Frasca; Alyssa H Koomas; Grace Chan; Sara C Folta; Julianne Heck; Molly Newman; Jennifer M Sacheck Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2017-01-27 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Rebekka M Lee; Jessica L Barrett; James G Daly; Rebecca S Mozaffarian; Catherine M Giles; Angie L Cradock; Steven L Gortmaker Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2019-11-28 Impact factor: 3.295