OBJECTIVE: It has been considered that cesarean delivery is a risk factor for the two subtypes of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs): Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of this meta-analysis was to examine the relationship between cesarean delivery and the development of IBD. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We searched the articles retrieved by PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases to identify observational studies regarding the relationship between cesarean section and the development of CD and/or UC. Pooled odds ratios were calculated for each relationship. RESULTS: Nine studies evaluated the potential association between cesarean delivery and the development of IBD and met all of our inclusion criteria. The pooled data from six included studies indicated cesarean delivery was a risk factor for CD (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-1.70; p = 0.003). Likewise, we observed a positive association between cesarean delivery and pediatric CD (95% CI: 1.06-1.35; p = 0.005). However, results from the four included studies for UC indicated the rate of cesarean section in UC patients was not higher than that of control subjects (95% CI: 0.87-1.32; p = 0.54). Overall, we did not observe a positive relationship between cesarean delivery and IBD (95% CI: 0.99-1.30; p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: Results of this meta-analysis support the hypothesis that cesarean delivery was associated with the risk of CD but not of UC. The total rate of cesarean delivery of IBD patients was similar with that of control subjects.
OBJECTIVE: It has been considered that cesarean delivery is a risk factor for the two subtypes of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs): Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of this meta-analysis was to examine the relationship between cesarean delivery and the development of IBD. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We searched the articles retrieved by PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases to identify observational studies regarding the relationship between cesarean section and the development of CD and/or UC. Pooled odds ratios were calculated for each relationship. RESULTS: Nine studies evaluated the potential association between cesarean delivery and the development of IBD and met all of our inclusion criteria. The pooled data from six included studies indicated cesarean delivery was a risk factor for CD (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-1.70; p = 0.003). Likewise, we observed a positive association between cesarean delivery and pediatric CD (95% CI: 1.06-1.35; p = 0.005). However, results from the four included studies for UC indicated the rate of cesarean section in UC patients was not higher than that of control subjects (95% CI: 0.87-1.32; p = 0.54). Overall, we did not observe a positive relationship between cesarean delivery and IBD (95% CI: 0.99-1.30; p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: Results of this meta-analysis support the hypothesis that cesarean delivery was associated with the risk of CD but not of UC. The total rate of cesarean delivery of IBDpatients was similar with that of control subjects.
Authors: Severin A Lautenschlager; Nicolas Fournier; Luc Biedermann; Valerie Pittet; Philipp Schreiner; Benjamin Misselwitz; Michael Scharl; Gerhard Rogler; Alexander R Siebenhüner Journal: Inflamm Intest Dis Date: 2020-08-26
Authors: Angela Moya-Pérez; Pauline Luczynski; Ingrid B Renes; Shugui Wang; Yuliya Borre; C Anthony Ryan; Jan Knol; Catherine Stanton; Timothy G Dinan; John F Cryan Journal: Nutr Rev Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 7.110
Authors: Lea Takács; Samuel P Putnam; Catherine Monk; Hannah G Dahlen; Charlene Thornton; František Bartoš; Anastasia Topalidou; Lilian L Peters Journal: Child Psychiatry Hum Dev Date: 2020-10-31
Authors: S Prescott; C Dreisbach; K Baumgartel; R Koerner; A Gyamfi; M Canellas; A St Fleur; W A Henderson; G Trinchieri Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2021-12-10 Impact factor: 3.418