| Literature DB >> 24940599 |
Xiaoyan Gao1, Mingxing Guo1, Qiang Li2, Long Peng1, Haiyu Liu1, Li Zhang1, Xu Bai3, Yingxin Wang4, Jian Li5, Chengke Cai2.
Abstract
Shuang-huang-lian injection (SHLI) is a famous Chinese patent medicine, which has been wildly used in clinic for the treatment of acute respiratory tract infection, pneumonia, influenza, etc. The existing randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies suggested that SHLI could afford a certain anti-febrile action. However, seldom does research concern the pharmacological mechanisms of SHLI. In the current study, we explored plasma metabolomic profiling technique and selected potential metabolic markers to reveal the antipyretic mechanism of SHLI on yeast-induced pyrexia rat model using UPLC-Q-TOF/MS coupled with multivariate statistical analysis and pattern recognition techniques. We discovered a significant perturbance of metabolic profile in the plasma of fever rats and obvious reversion in SHLI-administered rats. Eight potential biomarkers, i.e. 1) 3-hydeoxybutyric acid, 2) leucine, 3) 16:0 LPC, 4) allocholic acid, 5) vitamin B2, 6) Cys-Lys-His, 7) 18:2 LPC, and 8) 3-hydroxychola-7, 22-dien-24-oic acid, were screened out by OPLS-DA approach. Five potential perturbed metabolic pathways, i.e. 1) valine, leucine, and isoleucine biosynthesis, 2) glycerophospholipid metabolism, 3) ketone bodies synthesis and degradation, 4) bile acid biosynthesis, and 5) riboflavin metabolism, were revealed to relate to the antipyretic mechanisms of SHLI. Overall, we investigated antipyretic mechanisms of SHLI at metabolomic level for the first time, and the obtained results highlights the necessity of adopting metabolomics as a reliable tool for understanding the holism and synergism of Chinese patent drug.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24940599 PMCID: PMC4062457 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1The changing trend of rectal temperatures in NC, M and SHLI treatment group.
Data was expressed as mean ± SD. ### P<0.001 vs., NC group; **P<0.01 vs., M group.
Figure 2Typical base peak intensity (BPI) chromatograms ofplasma samples from each groups.
(A) NC at positive ion mode. (B) M at positive ion mode (C) SHLI treatment at positive mode (Blue arrows show drug induced components).
Figure 3The results of multiple pattern recognition of plasma metabolites (PCA scores).
(A) At positive ion mode. (B) At negative ion mode. Note: NC (▴), M (•) and SHLI (▪).
Figure 4The results of S-plots of OPLS-DA models.
(A) At positive ion mode. (B) At negative ion mode. Note: NC (▴), M (•) and SHLI (▪).
Metabolites selected by OPLS-DA with VIP >1 and significant test P<0.05 between the pyretic model group and the normal control group.
| No. | tR- | VIP | Quasi-molecular ion | Formula | Metabolites | M | SHLI | MS/MS | Loss | Related Pathway |
|
| 1.2403–136.0763 | 1.58 | [M+H]+ | C8H9NO | 2-Aminoacetophenone | ↓# | ↑ | 119.0490; 91.0678 | −NH3; −C2H3O | Unknown |
|
| 1.2996–132.1027 | 1.09 | [M+H]+ | C6H13NO2 | Leucinea | ↑# | ↓* | 86.0968; 69.0701; 55.0398 | −CH2O2; −CH5O2N; −C2H7O2N | Valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation/biosynthesis; Glucosinolate biosynthesis; Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesi |
|
| 1.6469–120.0815 | 1.91 | [M+H]+ | C8H9N | Indoline | ↑# # | ↓ | 104.0626 | −NH2 | Unknown |
|
| 5.9690–373.2733 | 3.19 | [M+H]+ | C24H36O3 | 3-Hydroxychola-7, 22-dien-24-oic acid | ↓# # | ↑* | 355.2595; 227.1801; 201.1626 | −H2O; −C7H14O3; −C9H16O3 | Secondary bile acid biosynthesis |
|
| 6.0673–387.1802 | 4.41 | [M+H]+ | C15H26N6O4S | Cys-Lys-His | ↓# # # | ↑** | 231.1104; 105.0709 | −C5H8N4S; −C12H18O2N4S | Unknown |
|
| 6.1132–357.2787 | 2.31 | [M+H]+ | C24H36O2 | 5beta-Chola-7, 9 (11) -dien-24-oic acid | ↓# # | ↑ | 339.2680; 247.1692; 111.1143 | −H2O; −C8H14; −C16H22O2 | Secondary bile acid biosynthesis |
|
| 7.3612–520.3396 | 5.01 | [M+H]+ | C26H50NO7P | LysoPC (18∶2) | ↓# # # | ↑*** | 502.3279; 240.1013; 184.0727 | −H2O; −C18H32O2; −C21H36O3 | Glycerophospholipid metabolism |
|
| 1.1853–103.0396 | 4.54 | [M-H]− | C4H8O3 | 3-Hydroxybutyric acid (3-HB)a | ↑# | ↓** | 85.0301; 59.0141 | −H2O; −C2H4O | Synthesis and degradation of ketone bodies; Butanoate metabolism; Metabolic pathways |
|
|
| 1.80 | [M+FA-H]− | C24H40O5 | Allocholic acida | ↓# # | ↑* | 407.2804; 343.2635; 289.2235; 251.2093 | −CH2O2; −C2H6O5; −C6H12O5; −C9H14O5 | Secondary bile acid biosynthesis |
|
| 3.7077–421.1409 | 1.04 | [M+FA-H]− | C17H20N4O6 | Vitamin B2a | ↓# # | ↑*** | 255.0880; 241.0738; 212.0816 | −C5H10O6; −C6H12O6; −C12H10N4O3 | Riboflavin metabolism; Vitamin digestion and absorption |
|
| 3.7717–448.3059 | 1.84 | [M-H]− | C26H43NO5 | Deoxycholic acid glycine conjugate | ↓# # | ↓ | 294.1783; 257.1782 | −C10H18O; −C9H19O4 | Secondary bile acid biosynthesis |
|
| 4.3496–391.2858 | 1.31 | [M-H]− | C24H40O4 | Deoxycholic acida | ↓# # | ↑ | 345.2807; 329.2882; 327.2711; 311.2400 | −CH2O2; −CH2O3; −CH4O3; −CH4O4 | Secondary bile acid biosynthesis |
|
| 4.3993–564.3294 | 2.57 | [M+FA-H]− | C26H50NO7P | LysoPC (18∶2)a | ↓# | ↑ | 504.3081; 279.2325; 224.0688 | −C2H5O2; −C9H21O7NP; −C20H43O5 | Glycerophospholipid metabolism |
|
| 4.6068–540.3299 | 2.48 | [M+FA-H]− | C24H50NO7P | LysoPC (16∶0)a | ↑# | ↓* | 480.3089; 255.2323 | −C2H5O2; −C9H21O7NP | Glycerophospholipid metabolism |
|
| 4.7769–566.3451 | 1.43 | [M+FA-H]− | C26H52NO7P | LysoPC (18∶1) | ↓# | ↑ | 506.3269; 281.2488 | −C2H5O2; −C9H21O7NP | Glycerophospholipid metabolism |
Note: aMetabolites were identified based on database information in METLIN, Lipid MAPs or HMDB; ↑showed up-regulated metabolites and ↓showed down-regulated metabolites; # p<0.05, # # p<0.01, # # # p<0.001 Model vs. normal control; *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 SHLI vs. Model.
Figure 5The results of relative integral levels of metabolites among NC, M and SHLI treatment groups.
(A) At positive ion mode. (B) At negative ion mode. a P<0.05 or P<0.01 among NC, M, and SHLI treatment group.
Figure 6Summary of pathway analysis with MetPA.
Note: 1. Valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis. 2. Glycerophospholipid metabolism. 3. Synthesis and degradation of ketone bodies. 4. Riboflavin metabolism. 5. Butanoate metabolism. 6. Valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation. 7. Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis.
Figure 7The profile of metabolic network.
The map was gained by analyzing the known metabolic pathways.