Literature DB >> 24940498

Prognostic role of substaging in T1G3 transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder.

Vincenzo DE Marco1, Maria Angela Cerruto1, Carolina D'Elia1, Matteo Brunelli2, Oscar Otte1, Anila Minja1, Claudio Luchini2, Giovanni Novella1, Stefano Cavalleri1, Guido Martignoni2, Walter Artibani1.   

Abstract

This study was conducted to test a new substaging system in a population of patients with stage T1 bladder cancer (BC) at diagnosis and assess its prognostic role in terms of disease progression and disease-specific survival (DSS). Patients with primary stage T1G3 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder were stratified according to the following models: i) T1a [the tumour does not infiltrate the muscularis mucosae-vascular plexus, (MM-VP)]; T1b (the tumour partially infiltrates the MM-VP); and T1c (the tumour infiltrates and invades the MM-VP). ii) T1m (diameter of tumour infiltrating the lamina propria ≤0.5 mm under a high-resolution microscope; and T1e (diameter of tumour infiltrating the lamina propria >0.5 mm). Age, gender, tumour size and multifocality were not found to be of statistical significance. Using the T1a/T1b/T1c system, patients with stage T1a disease exhibited a 5- and 10-year progression rate of 13.3 and 20%, respectively, without reaching statistical significance. Moreover, patients with stage T1a disease exhibited a 5- and 10-year DSS of 93.3 and 73.3%, respectively, which was higher compared to T1b and T1c but not statistically significant. Using the T1m/T1e system, patients with stage T1m disease exhibited a disease progression rate of 8.3 and 16.7% at 5 and 10 years, respectively, which was not statistically significant. Moreover, patients in group T1m presented with DSS rates of 91.7 and 83.3% at 5 and 10 years, respectively, which were higher compared to those in the T1e group (71.4 and 60.7%), although not reaching statistical significance. In conclusion, in our study, neither of the two substaging systems of stage T1 BC reached the prognostic conventional significance level for tumour progression or DSS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bladder carcinoma; prognosis; substaging; transitional cell carcinoma

Year:  2014        PMID: 24940498      PMCID: PMC4051551          DOI: 10.3892/mco.2014.290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol        ISSN: 2049-9450


  28 in total

1.  Indications for early cystectomy.

Authors:  John P Stein
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Predicting cancer progression in patients with stage T1 bladder carcinoma.

Authors:  L Cheng; R M Neumann; A L Weaver; B E Spotts; D G Bostwick
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Best practice in the treatment of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Anastasios Anastasiadis; Theo M de Reijke
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2012-02

4.  Prognostic value of P53 nuclear accumulation and histopathologic features in T1 transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder.

Authors:  S F Shariat; A Z Weizer; A Green; R Laucirica; A Frolov; T M Wheeler; S P Lerner
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  The predictive value of muscularis mucosae invasion and p53 over expression on progression of stage T1 bladder carcinoma.

Authors:  S Bernardini; C Billerey; M Martin; G L Adessi; H Wallerand; H Bittard
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Prognostic factors in stage T1 bladder cancer: tumor pattern (solid or papillary) and vascular invasion more important than depth of invasion.

Authors:  Patrik Andius; Sonny L Johansson; Sten Holmäng
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Significance of invasion to the muscularis mucosae on the progression of superficial bladder cancer.

Authors:  Y Hasui; Y Osada; S Kitada; S Nishi
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 8.  Invasive T1 bladder cancer: indications and rationale for radical cystectomy.

Authors:  John P Stein; David F Penson
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Predicting outcome in minimally invasive (T1a and T1b) urothelial bladder carcinoma using a panel of biomarkers: a high throughput tissue microarray analysis.

Authors:  Paulette Mhawech-Fauceglia; Gabor Fischer; Victor Alvarez; Arsalan Ahmed; François R Herrmann
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-07-23       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Prognosis of muscle-invasive bladder cancer: difference between primary and progressive tumours and implications for therapy.

Authors:  Barthold Ph Schrier; Maarten P Hollander; Bas W G van Rhijn; Lambertus A L M Kiemeney; J Alfred Witjes
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  A practical guide to bladder cancer pathology.

Authors:  Eva Compérat; Justine Varinot; Julien Moroch; Caroline Eymerit-Morin; Fadi Brimo
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  How do we manage high-grade T1 bladder cancer? Conservative or aggressive therapy?

Authors:  Seok Joong Yun; Seon-Kyu Kim; Wun-Jae Kim
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2016-06-10

3.  Comparative differences between T1a/b and T1e/m as substages in T1 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  Turgay Turan; Özgür Efiloğlu; Bilal Günaydin; Şeyma Özkanli; Emrah Nikerel; Gökhan Atiş; Turhan Çaşkurlu; Asif Yildirim
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.