Mohamed Bishr1, Jean-Baptiste Lattouf1, Mathieu Latour2, Fred Saad1. 1. Department of Urology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC; 2. Department of Pathology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: To identify patients who should be considered for early radical cystectomy, we evaluated the clinical and pathological variables affecting the outcome of patients with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) who underwent re-staging transurethral resection (re-TUR). METHODS: We reviewed the clinical data of 453 patients treated for urothelial carcinoma between 2006 and 2010. In total, 94 patients underwent re-TUR after their initial TUR. Of these, 72 were not upstaged to muscle invasive disease and were therefore included in our study. RESULTS: On re-TUR, 31 patients had no residual tumour (T0) and 41 patients had residual NMIBC. A statistically significant difference was noted between patients with pT0 and patients with residual NMIBC on re-TUR in regard to tumour recurrence and progression (39% vs. 83%, p < 0.001) (6% vs. 34%, p = 0.005), respectively. On multivariate analysis, tumour stage on re-TUR and the regimen of intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy (induction vs. maintenance) remained independent predicting factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS) (p = 0.001, hazard ratio [HR]: 1.77), (p < 0.001 HR: 0.16) and progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.014, HR: 2.11), (p = 0.008, HR: 0.097), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of T0 on re-TUR is associated with better RFS and PFS and could be a predictive factor for candidates for conservative management. Patients with persistent NMIBC on re-TUR require close follow-up and, in some cases, could be considered for early cystectomy. Maintenance intravesical BCG therapy can improve RFS and PFS in patients with high-risk NMIBC. This study is limited by its retrospective nature and the relatively small number of patients in the cohort.
INTRODUCTION: To identify patients who should be considered for early radical cystectomy, we evaluated the clinical and pathological variables affecting the outcome of patients with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) who underwent re-staging transurethral resection (re-TUR). METHODS: We reviewed the clinical data of 453 patients treated for urothelial carcinoma between 2006 and 2010. In total, 94 patients underwent re-TUR after their initial TUR. Of these, 72 were not upstaged to muscle invasive disease and were therefore included in our study. RESULTS: On re-TUR, 31 patients had no residual tumour (T0) and 41 patients had residual NMIBC. A statistically significant difference was noted between patients with pT0 and patients with residual NMIBC on re-TUR in regard to tumour recurrence and progression (39% vs. 83%, p < 0.001) (6% vs. 34%, p = 0.005), respectively. On multivariate analysis, tumour stage on re-TUR and the regimen of intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy (induction vs. maintenance) remained independent predicting factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS) (p = 0.001, hazard ratio [HR]: 1.77), (p < 0.001 HR: 0.16) and progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.014, HR: 2.11), (p = 0.008, HR: 0.097), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of T0 on re-TUR is associated with better RFS and PFS and could be a predictive factor for candidates for conservative management. Patients with persistent NMIBC on re-TUR require close follow-up and, in some cases, could be considered for early cystectomy. Maintenance intravesical BCG therapy can improve RFS and PFS in patients with high-risk NMIBC. This study is limited by its retrospective nature and the relatively small number of patients in the cohort.
Authors: Alan M Nieder; Maurizio Brausi; Donald Lamm; Michael O'Donnell; Kyouichi Tomita; Henry Woo; Michael A S Jewett Journal: Urology Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Ganesh V Raj; Harry Herr; Angel M Serio; Sherri M Donat; Bernard H Bochner; Andrew J Vickers; Guido Dalbagni Journal: J Urol Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Richard J Sylvester; Adrian P M van der Meijden; Willem Oosterlinck; J Alfred Witjes; Christian Bouffioux; Louis Denis; Donald W W Newling; Karlheinz Kurth Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2006-01-17 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Rodolfo Hurle; Paolo Casale; Massimo Lazzeri; Marco Paciotti; Alberto Saita; Piergiuseppe Colombo; Emanuela Morenghi; David Oswald; Daniela Colleselli; Michael Mitterberger; Thomas Kunit; Martina Hager; Thomas R W Herrmann; Lukas Lusuardi Journal: World J Urol Date: 2019-05-21 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: J Palou; F Pisano; R Sylvester; S Joniau; V Serretta; S Larré; S Di Stasi; B van Rhijn; A J Witjes; A Grotenhuis; R Colombo; A Briganti; M Babjuk; V Soukup; P U Malmstrom; J Irani; N Malats; J Baniel; R Mano; T Cai; E K Cha; P Ardelt; J Varkarakis; R Bartoletti; G Dalbagni; S F Shariat; E Xylinas; R J Karnes; P Gontero Journal: World J Urol Date: 2018-05-02 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Anna Katarzyna Czech; Katarzyna Gronostaj; Jakub Frydrych; Jakub Fronczek; Mikołaj Przydacz; Tomasz Wiatr; Łukasz Curyło; Przemysław Dudek; Jerzy Gąsowski; Piotr L Chłosta Journal: Cent European J Urol Date: 2019-09-16