Literature DB >> 24940285

2,5-Di-bromo-3,6-dimeth-oxycyclo-hexa-2,5-diene-1,4-dione.

Ersin Orhan1, Amine Garci1, Bruno Therrien1.   

Abstract

In the structure of the title compound, C8H6Br2O4, the complete mol-ecule is generated by the application of a centre of inversion. The mol-ecule is planar (r.m.s. deviation for all non-H atoms but methyl C = 0.0358 Å), with only the methyl groups being deviated from the plane [by ±0.321 (4) Å]. In the crystal packing, Br⋯O(methoxy) halogen bonds [3.2407 (19) Å] connect molecules into supramolecular layers parallel to (101).

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 24940285      PMCID: PMC4051031          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814011787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the synthesis of the title compound, see: Viault et al. (2011 ▶). For the structure of bromanilic acid, see: Robl (1987 ▶). For similar structures with a 2,5-cyclo­hexa­diene-1,4-dione core, see: Nakatsuji et al. (2009 ▶). For an article dealing with the biological relevance of this type of compound, see: Viault et al. (2013 ▶). For papers using the title compound as a synthetic precursor, see: Khan & Driscoll (1976 ▶); Tatsuta et al. (2001 ▶); Kasahara & Kondo (2006 ▶); Gan et al. (2009 ▶). For metalla-assemblies obtained with analogous building blocks, see: Gupta et al. (2014 ▶); Therrien (2009 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C8H6Br2O4 M = 325.95 Monoclinic, a = 9.4456 (9) Å b = 5.4877 (3) Å c = 10.0341 (9) Å β = 113.846 (7)° V = 475.71 (7) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 8.50 mm−1 T = 173 K 0.23 × 0.21 × 0.20 mm

Data collection

Stoe IPDS diffractometer Absorption correction: part of the refinement model (ΔF) (DIFABS; Walker & Stuart, 1983 ▶) T min = 0.246, T max = 0.704 8772 measured reflections 1284 independent reflections 1144 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.071

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.028 wR(F 2) = 0.067 S = 1.04 1284 reflections 65 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.86 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.98 e Å−3 Data collection: EXPOSE (Stoe & Cie, 2000 ▶); cell refinement: CELL (Stoe & Cie, 2000 ▶); data reduction: INTEGRATE (Stoe & Cie, 2000 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814011787/tk5317sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814011787/tk5317Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814011787/tk5317Isup3.cml CCDC reference: 1004507 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C8H6Br2O4F(000) = 312
Mr = 325.95Dx = 2.276 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 7998 reflections
a = 9.4456 (9) Åθ = 2.4–25.9°
b = 5.4877 (3) ŵ = 8.50 mm1
c = 10.0341 (9) ÅT = 173 K
β = 113.846 (7)°Block, red
V = 475.71 (7) Å30.23 × 0.21 × 0.20 mm
Z = 2
Stoe IPDS diffractometer1284 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1144 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.071
Detector resolution: 0 pixels mm-1θmax = 29.2°, θmin = 2.5°
φ oscillation scansh = −12→12
Absorption correction: part of the refinement model (ΔF) (DIFABS; Walker & Stuart, 1983)k = −7→7
Tmin = 0.246, Tmax = 0.704l = −13→13
8772 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.028Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.067H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.04w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0431P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1284 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
65 parametersΔρmax = 0.86 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.98 e Å3
Experimental. A crystal was mounted at 173 K on a Stoe Image Plate Diffraction System (Stoe & Cie, 2000) using Mo Kα graphite monochromated radiation. Image plate distance 100 mm, φ oscillation scans 0 - 180°, step Δφ = 1.2°, 3 minutes per frame.
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Br10.14128 (3)0.21073 (5)0.79296 (3)0.02303 (10)
C2−0.0827 (3)0.2940 (4)0.9112 (3)0.0197 (4)
C4−0.3943 (3)0.2112 (5)0.9080 (3)0.0253 (5)
H4A−0.40450.24670.81090.038*
H4B−0.49250.23330.91380.038*
H4C−0.36080.04570.93200.038*
O2−0.2815 (2)0.3740 (4)1.00971 (19)0.0262 (4)
O1−0.1483 (2)0.1143 (4)0.8426 (2)0.0332 (4)
C10.0654 (3)0.3806 (4)0.9134 (2)0.0176 (4)
C3−0.1485 (2)0.4344 (4)1.0024 (2)0.0174 (4)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Br10.02309 (14)0.02542 (15)0.02416 (15)0.00012 (9)0.01326 (10)−0.00545 (8)
C20.0212 (11)0.0197 (10)0.0193 (11)−0.0009 (8)0.0093 (9)−0.0011 (8)
C40.0178 (10)0.0290 (12)0.0266 (12)−0.0072 (9)0.0064 (9)−0.0016 (9)
O20.0216 (8)0.0326 (9)0.0283 (9)−0.0113 (7)0.0143 (7)−0.0098 (8)
O10.0311 (10)0.0297 (10)0.0443 (11)−0.0119 (8)0.0209 (9)−0.0171 (9)
C10.0185 (10)0.0190 (10)0.0169 (9)0.0013 (8)0.0090 (8)−0.0011 (8)
C30.0176 (9)0.0184 (10)0.0177 (9)−0.0004 (8)0.0086 (8)0.0012 (7)
Br1—C11.882 (2)C4—H4B0.9600
C2—O11.219 (3)C4—H4C0.9600
C2—C11.469 (3)O2—C31.330 (3)
C2—C31.509 (3)C1—C3i1.351 (3)
C4—O21.448 (3)C3—C1i1.351 (3)
C4—H4A0.9600
O1—C2—C1122.3 (2)H4B—C4—H4C109.5
O1—C2—C3121.0 (2)C3—O2—C4123.90 (19)
C1—C2—C3116.68 (19)C3i—C1—C2124.14 (19)
O2—C4—H4A109.5C3i—C1—Br1119.87 (16)
O2—C4—H4B109.5C2—C1—Br1115.96 (16)
H4A—C4—H4B109.5O2—C3—C1i118.4 (2)
O2—C4—H4C109.5O2—C3—C2122.4 (2)
H4A—C4—H4C109.5C1i—C3—C2119.05 (19)
O1—C2—C1—C3i−174.0 (2)C4—O2—C3—C2−15.5 (4)
C3—C2—C1—C3i4.2 (4)O1—C2—C3—O2−1.7 (4)
O1—C2—C1—Br14.2 (3)C1—C2—C3—O2−179.9 (2)
C3—C2—C1—Br1−177.59 (16)O1—C2—C3—C1i174.3 (2)
C4—O2—C3—C1i168.5 (2)C1—C2—C3—C1i−4.0 (4)
  7 in total

1.  Short and convergent synthesis of asterriquinone B1 and demethylasterriquinone B1.

Authors:  K Tatsuta; H Mukai; K Mitsumoto
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Potential central nervous system antitumor agents. Aziridinylbenzoquinones. 1.

Authors:  A H Khan; J S Driscoll
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Spin-carrying benzoquinone derivatives.

Authors:  Shin'ichi Nakatsuji; Mitsunori Nobusawa; Hideto Suzuki; Hiroki Akutsu; Jun-Ichi Yamada
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 4.354

5.  Hemisynthesis of selected embelin analogs and investigation of their proapoptotic activity against cancer cells.

Authors:  Guillaume Viault; Katragadda Suresh Babu; Fabien Gautier; Sophie Barillé-Nion; Philippe Juin; Olivier Tasseau; René Grée
Journal:  Med Chem       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.745

6.  An approach to 3,6-disubstituted 2,5-dioxybenzoquinones via two sequential Suzuki couplings. three-step synthesis of leucomelone.

Authors:  Xianwen Gan; Wei Jiang; Wei Wang; Lihong Hu
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 6.005

7.  Fluorous-tagged indolylboron for the diversity-oriented synthesis of biologically-attractive bisindole derivatives.

Authors:  Takahiro Kasahara; Yoshinori Kondo
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 6.222

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.