Literature DB >> 24940235

3-Iodo-1H-pyrazolo-[3,4-b]pyridine.

Ping-Hsin Huang1, Yuh-Sheng Wen2, Jiun-Yi Shen3.   

Abstract

The title compound, C6H4IN3, is essentially planar, with a dihedral angle of 0.82 (3)° between the planes of the pyridine and pyrazole rings. In the crystal, pairs of mol-ecules are connected into inversion dimers through N-H⋯N hydrogen bonds. C-I⋯N halogen bonds link the dimers into zigzag chains parallel to the b-axis direction. The packing also features π-π stacking inter-actions along (110) with inter-planar distances of 3.292 (1) and 3.343 (1) Å, and centroid-centroid distances of 3.308 (1) and 3.430 (1) Å.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 24940235      PMCID: PMC4051060          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814010009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the production of anti­tumor agents, see: Huang et al. (2007 ▶); Ye et al. (2009 ▶). For a related structure, see: Huang et al. (2013 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C6H4IN3 M = 245.02 Monoclinic, a = 10.7999 (13) Å b = 7.7939 (9) Å c = 17.406 (2) Å β = 101.748 (2)° V = 1434.5 (3) Å3 Z = 8 Mo Kα radiation μ = 4.38 mm−1 T = 150 K 0.35 × 0.32 × 0.25 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART APEX CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 1996 ▶) T min = 0.309, T max = 0.407 5315 measured reflections 1470 independent reflections 1423 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.022

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.017 wR(F 2) = 0.040 S = 1.13 1470 reflections 91 parameters 26 restraints H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.40 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.46 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2001 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2001 ▶); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2001 ▶; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2013 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 2012 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) ic14830, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814010009/zl2581sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814010009/zl2581Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814010009/zl2581Isup3.cml CCDC reference: 1000735 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C6H4IN3F(000) = 912
Mr = 245.02Dx = 2.269 Mg m3Dm = 2.269 Mg m3Dm measured by not measured
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 10.7999 (13) ÅCell parameters from 4550 reflections
b = 7.7939 (9) Åθ = 2.4–27.5°
c = 17.406 (2) ŵ = 4.38 mm1
β = 101.748 (2)°T = 150 K
V = 1434.5 (3) Å3Block, colorless
Z = 80.35 × 0.32 × 0.25 mm
Bruker SMART APEX CCD area-detector diffractometer1470 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1423 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.022
ω scansθmax = 26.4°, θmin = 2.4°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 1996)h = −14→13
Tmin = 0.309, Tmax = 0.407k = −10→9
5315 measured reflectionsl = −22→22
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.017Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.040H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.13w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0156P)2 + 1.9173P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1470 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.003
91 parametersΔρmax = 0.40 e Å3
26 restraintsΔρmin = −0.46 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R-factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
I10.23044 (2)1.04283 (2)0.29263 (2)0.02252 (7)
N10.46725 (18)0.6969 (3)0.56007 (11)0.0202 (4)
N20.44327 (18)0.6579 (3)0.42063 (11)0.0196 (4)
H2A0.48690.56220.42190.023*
N30.38503 (19)0.7396 (3)0.35341 (11)0.0201 (4)
C10.4368 (2)0.8083 (3)0.61183 (13)0.0226 (5)
H10.46410.78220.66600.027*
C20.3682 (2)0.9594 (3)0.59272 (15)0.0249 (5)
H20.35171.03250.63320.030*
C30.3242 (2)1.0027 (3)0.51533 (15)0.0223 (5)
H30.27581.10380.50100.027*
C40.3539 (2)0.8915 (3)0.45868 (13)0.0177 (4)
C50.4249 (2)0.7441 (3)0.48502 (13)0.0178 (4)
C60.3326 (2)0.8785 (3)0.37596 (13)0.0189 (4)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
I10.02567 (11)0.01896 (10)0.02189 (10)0.00157 (6)0.00242 (7)0.00504 (6)
N10.0215 (10)0.0196 (10)0.0186 (9)−0.0028 (8)0.0020 (8)0.0012 (8)
N20.0222 (10)0.0173 (10)0.0184 (9)0.0042 (8)0.0020 (8)0.0004 (7)
N30.0229 (10)0.0192 (10)0.0174 (9)−0.0007 (8)0.0022 (8)0.0019 (8)
C10.0264 (13)0.0240 (12)0.0174 (10)−0.0075 (10)0.0043 (9)−0.0015 (9)
C20.0281 (14)0.0234 (13)0.0252 (12)−0.0062 (10)0.0105 (10)−0.0064 (10)
C30.0241 (13)0.0159 (11)0.0287 (12)−0.0020 (10)0.0097 (10)−0.0022 (9)
C40.0181 (11)0.0138 (11)0.0218 (11)−0.0036 (9)0.0051 (9)0.0011 (9)
C50.0171 (11)0.0160 (11)0.0200 (11)−0.0037 (9)0.0031 (8)−0.0009 (8)
C60.0187 (11)0.0168 (11)0.0205 (11)−0.0006 (9)0.0023 (9)0.0026 (9)
I1—C62.076 (2)C1—H10.9500
N1—C11.339 (3)C2—C31.376 (4)
N1—C51.345 (3)C2—H20.9500
N2—C51.356 (3)C3—C41.398 (3)
N2—N31.368 (3)C3—H30.9500
N2—H2A0.8800C4—C51.405 (3)
N3—C61.318 (3)C4—C61.415 (3)
C1—C21.396 (4)
C1—N1—C5113.2 (2)C2—C3—H3121.5
C5—N2—N3110.93 (18)C4—C3—H3121.5
C5—N2—H2A124.5C3—C4—C5117.7 (2)
N3—N2—H2A124.5C3—C4—C6138.5 (2)
C6—N3—N2106.15 (18)C5—C4—C6103.79 (19)
N1—C1—C2125.3 (2)N1—C5—N2126.1 (2)
N1—C1—H1117.4N1—C5—C4126.6 (2)
C2—C1—H1117.4N2—C5—C4107.31 (19)
C3—C2—C1120.1 (2)N3—C6—C4111.8 (2)
C3—C2—H2120.0N3—C6—I1119.88 (16)
C1—C2—H2120.0C4—C6—I1128.30 (17)
C2—C3—C4117.1 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N2—H2A···N1i0.882.092.926 (3)159
C6—I1···N3ii2.08 (1)3.01 (1)5.056 (3)167 (1)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N2—H2A⋯N1i 0.882.092.926 (3)159
C6—I1⋯N3ii 2.076 (2)3.013 (2)5.056 (3)166.72 (7)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  4 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Synthesis of 3-(1H-benzimidazol-2-yl)-5-isoquinolin-4-ylpyrazolo[1,2-b]pyridine, a potent cyclin dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) inhibitor.

Authors:  Shenlin Huang; Ronghui Lin; Yang Yu; Yanhua Lu; Peter J Connolly; George Chiu; Shengjian Li; Stuart L Emanuel; Steven A Middleton
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Synthesis and evaluation of novel 7-azaindazolyl-indolyl-maleimide derivatives as antitumor agents and protein kinase C inhibitors.

Authors:  Qing Ye; Ji Cao; Xinglu Zhou; Dan Lv; Qiaojun He; Bo Yang; Yongzhou Hu
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2009-05-03       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  4-(1H-Pyrrolo-[2,3-b]pyridin-2-yl)pyridine.

Authors:  Ping-Hsin Huang; Yuh-Sheng Wen; Jiun-Yi Shen
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2013-04-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.