Literature DB >> 24940228

4-(Prop-2-yn-yl)-2H-1,4-benzo-thia-zin-3(4H)-one.

Nada Kheira Sebbar1, Abdelfettah Zerzouf2, El Mokhtar Essassi1, Mohamed Saadi3, Lahcen El Ammari3.   

Abstract

In the title compound, C11H9NOS, the six-membered heterocycle of the benzo-thia-zine fragment exhibits a screw-boat conformation. The benzene ring makes a dihedral angle of 79.4 (1)° with the mean plane through the prop-2-ynyl chain and the ring N atom. In the crystal, mol-ecules are linked by C-H⋯O inter-actions of the acetyl-enic C-H group towards the carbonyl O atom of a neighbouring mol-ecule, forming zigzag chains running along the b-axis direction.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 24940228      PMCID: PMC4050998          DOI: 10.1107/S160053681400943X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For general background to the synthesis of 1,4-benzo­thia­zines derivatives, see: Sebbar et al. (2014 ▶); Zerzouf et al. (2001 ▶). For the pharmacological activity of 1,4-benzo­thia­zine derivatives, see: Trapani et al. (1985 ▶); Yaltirik et al. (2001 ▶); Wammack et al. (2002 ▶). For puckering parameters, see: Cremer & Pople (1975 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C11H9NOS M = 203.25 Monoclinic, a = 9.005 (2) Å b = 10.889 (3) Å c = 10.341 (3) Å β = 104.565 (7)° V = 981.3 (4) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.29 mm−1 T = 296 K 0.39 × 0.34 × 0.28 mm

Data collection

Bruker X8 APEX diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2009 ▶) T min = 0.692, T max = 0.747 9586 measured reflections 2532 independent reflections 2242 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.025

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.033 wR(F 2) = 0.097 S = 1.05 2532 reflections 127 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.29 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.26 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2009 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2009 ▶); data reduction: SAINT-Plus; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681400943X/im2453sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681400943X/im2453Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681400943X/im2453Isup3.cml CCDC reference: 999603 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C11H9NOSF(000) = 424
Mr = 203.25Dx = 1.376 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 2532 reflections
a = 9.005 (2) Åθ = 2.7–28.7°
b = 10.889 (3) ŵ = 0.29 mm1
c = 10.341 (3) ÅT = 296 K
β = 104.565 (7)°Block, colourless
V = 981.3 (4) Å30.39 × 0.34 × 0.28 mm
Z = 4
Bruker X8 APEX diffractometer2532 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube2242 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.025
φ and ω scansθmax = 28.7°, θmin = 2.7°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2009)h = −12→12
Tmin = 0.692, Tmax = 0.747k = −14→14
9586 measured reflectionsl = −13→13
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.033Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.097H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.05w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0525P)2 + 0.1971P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2532 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
127 parametersΔρmax = 0.29 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.26 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against all reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on all data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.72598 (13)0.66267 (11)0.41584 (11)0.0349 (2)
C20.57459 (15)0.63028 (14)0.40891 (14)0.0468 (3)
H20.52550.66350.46990.056*
C30.49680 (15)0.54991 (15)0.31310 (16)0.0545 (4)
H30.39500.53020.30810.065*
C40.57071 (16)0.49879 (14)0.22443 (16)0.0523 (3)
H40.51850.44390.15990.063*
C50.72189 (15)0.52826 (12)0.23035 (13)0.0432 (3)
H50.77100.49220.17090.052*
C60.80051 (12)0.61176 (10)0.32501 (11)0.0321 (2)
C71.05883 (13)0.68706 (11)0.43826 (12)0.0365 (2)
C81.00619 (14)0.69227 (13)0.56496 (12)0.0400 (3)
H8A1.08110.73650.63270.048*
H8B0.99810.60960.59740.048*
C91.00187 (16)0.64258 (13)0.20101 (12)0.0430 (3)
H9A0.91450.65910.12640.052*
H9B1.07790.70590.20210.052*
C101.06719 (14)0.52290 (14)0.18089 (12)0.0430 (3)
N10.95243 (11)0.64883 (9)0.32600 (9)0.0343 (2)
C111.12110 (16)0.42755 (16)0.16435 (14)0.0528 (3)
H111.16370.35220.15130.063*
O11.18902 (11)0.71561 (11)0.43539 (11)0.0552 (3)
S10.82271 (4)0.76777 (3)0.53643 (3)0.04266 (12)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0342 (5)0.0363 (6)0.0354 (5)0.0037 (4)0.0114 (4)0.0046 (4)
C20.0349 (6)0.0579 (8)0.0515 (7)0.0039 (5)0.0181 (5)0.0071 (6)
C30.0322 (6)0.0634 (9)0.0667 (9)−0.0064 (6)0.0101 (6)0.0087 (7)
C40.0433 (7)0.0464 (7)0.0602 (8)−0.0078 (6)−0.0002 (6)−0.0034 (6)
C50.0411 (6)0.0410 (6)0.0456 (6)0.0019 (5)0.0074 (5)−0.0055 (5)
C60.0299 (5)0.0317 (5)0.0350 (5)0.0015 (4)0.0086 (4)0.0038 (4)
C70.0342 (5)0.0343 (6)0.0421 (6)−0.0021 (4)0.0115 (4)0.0026 (5)
C80.0376 (6)0.0451 (6)0.0359 (6)−0.0005 (5)0.0067 (5)−0.0010 (5)
C90.0458 (7)0.0512 (7)0.0373 (6)0.0020 (5)0.0202 (5)0.0070 (5)
C100.0364 (6)0.0614 (8)0.0346 (6)0.0008 (5)0.0155 (5)−0.0003 (5)
N10.0335 (5)0.0389 (5)0.0340 (5)−0.0008 (4)0.0147 (4)0.0015 (4)
C110.0466 (7)0.0656 (9)0.0484 (7)0.0069 (7)0.0158 (6)−0.0085 (7)
O10.0370 (5)0.0686 (7)0.0619 (6)−0.0143 (4)0.0160 (4)0.0024 (5)
S10.0458 (2)0.04378 (19)0.04046 (19)0.00495 (12)0.01474 (14)−0.00623 (12)
C1—C21.3924 (17)C7—O11.2204 (15)
C1—C61.3990 (16)C7—N11.3709 (16)
C1—S11.7542 (13)C7—C81.5023 (16)
C2—C31.374 (2)C8—S11.8021 (13)
C2—H20.9300C8—H8A0.9700
C3—C41.379 (2)C8—H8B0.9700
C3—H30.9300C9—C101.4660 (19)
C4—C51.385 (2)C9—N11.4707 (14)
C4—H40.9300C9—H9A0.9700
C5—C61.3919 (17)C9—H9B0.9700
C5—H50.9300C10—C111.177 (2)
C6—N11.4239 (14)C11—H110.9300
C2—C1—C6119.60 (12)N1—C7—C8116.32 (10)
C2—C1—S1120.43 (10)C7—C8—S1110.60 (9)
C6—C1—S1119.97 (9)C7—C8—H8A109.5
C3—C2—C1120.88 (13)S1—C8—H8A109.5
C3—C2—H2119.6C7—C8—H8B109.5
C1—C2—H2119.6S1—C8—H8B109.5
C2—C3—C4119.52 (12)H8A—C8—H8B108.1
C2—C3—H3120.2C10—C9—N1112.76 (10)
C4—C3—H3120.2C10—C9—H9A109.0
C3—C4—C5120.71 (13)N1—C9—H9A109.0
C3—C4—H4119.6C10—C9—H9B109.0
C5—C4—H4119.6N1—C9—H9B109.0
C4—C5—C6120.20 (12)H9A—C9—H9B107.8
C4—C5—H5119.9C11—C10—C9179.18 (14)
C6—C5—H5119.9C7—N1—C6123.91 (9)
C5—C6—C1119.07 (11)C7—N1—C9117.17 (10)
C5—C6—N1120.54 (10)C6—N1—C9118.89 (10)
C1—C6—N1120.34 (10)C10—C11—H11180.0
O1—C7—N1121.86 (11)C1—S1—C895.14 (6)
O1—C7—C8121.83 (12)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C11—H11···O1i0.932.323.1937 (19)157
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C11—H11⋯O1i 0.932.323.1937 (19)157

Symmetry code: (i) .

  5 in total

1.  Efficacy of oral doxepin and piroxicam treatment for interstitial cystitis.

Authors:  Robert Wammack; Mesut Remzi; Christian Seitz; Bob Djavan; Michael Marberger
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  [Synthesis and antiinflammatory activity of various 1,4-benzothiazine derivatives].

Authors:  G Trapani; A Reho; F Morlacchi; A Latrofa; P Marchini; F Venturi; F Cantalamessa
Journal:  Farmaco Sci       Date:  1985-05

4.  4-[(1-Benzyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)meth-yl]-2H-1,4-benzo-thia-zin-3(4H)-one.

Authors:  Nada Kheira Sebbar; Abdelfettah Zerzouf; El Mokhtar Essassi; Mohamed Saadi; Lahcen El Ammari
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2014-01-18

5.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Synthesis and antibacterial activity of new 1,2,3-triazolylmethyl-2H-1,4-benzothiazin-3(4H)-one derivatives.

Authors:  Mohamed Ellouz; Nada Kheira Sebbar; Ismail Fichtali; Younes Ouzidan; Zakaria Mennane; Reda Charof; Joel T Mague; Martine Urrutigoïty; El Mokhtar Essassi
Journal:  Chem Cent J       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 4.215

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.