Literature DB >> 24940219

2-Hy-droxy-ethyl-ammonium iodide.

Christina Kohrt1, Anke Spannenberg1, Thomas Werner1.   

Abstract

In the crystal structure of the title salt, C2H8NO(+)·I(-), N-H⋯O, N-H⋯I and O-H⋯I hydrogen bonds lead to the formation of layers staggered along the c axis.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 24940219      PMCID: PMC4051054          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814009581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

A variety of compounds are known in the literature involving the cation [NH3CH2CH2OH]+. A WebCSD search (Release April 2014) yielded 85 examples (Thomas et al., 2010 ▶), see for example: Koo et al. (1974 ▶) for 2-hy­droxy­ethyl­ammonium bromide, or Koo et al. (1972 ▶) for 2-hy­droxy­ethyl­ammonium chloride.

Experimental

Crystal data

C2H8NO+·I− M = 188.99 Triclinic, a = 4.6557 (4) Å b = 7.5432 (6) Å c = 8.1787 (7) Å α = 85.235 (2)° β = 78.091 (2)° γ = 77.544 (2)° V = 274.21 (4) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 5.70 mm−1 T = 150 K 0.34 × 0.12 × 0.03 mm

Data collection

Bruker Kappa APEXII DUO diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2008 ▶) T min = 0.672, T max = 0.843 4884 measured reflections 1319 independent reflections 1254 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.021

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.014 wR(F 2) = 0.032 S = 1.08 1319 reflections 48 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.58 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.46 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2011 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2009 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: XP in SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, Global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814009581/zl2586sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814009581/zl2586Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814009581/zl2586Isup3.cml CCDC reference: 999797 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C2H8NO+·IZ = 2
Mr = 188.99F(000) = 176
Triclinic, P1Dx = 2.289 Mg m3
a = 4.6557 (4) ÅMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
b = 7.5432 (6) ÅCell parameters from 3767 reflections
c = 8.1787 (7) Åθ = 2.8–29.0°
α = 85.235 (2)°µ = 5.70 mm1
β = 78.091 (2)°T = 150 K
γ = 77.544 (2)°Plate, colorless
V = 274.21 (4) Å30.34 × 0.12 × 0.03 mm
Bruker Kappa APEXII DUO diffractometer1319 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1254 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Curved graphite monochromatorRint = 0.021
Detector resolution: 8.3333 pixels mm-1θmax = 28.0°, θmin = 2.6°
φ and ω scansh = −6→6
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2008)k = −9→9
Tmin = 0.672, Tmax = 0.843l = −10→10
4884 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.014Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.032H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.08w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0163P)2 + 0.0136P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1319 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.002
48 parametersΔρmax = 0.58 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.46 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
I10.63581 (3)0.752733 (16)0.669449 (16)0.01732 (5)
O11.1624 (3)0.3874 (2)0.79532 (19)0.0204 (3)
H1D1.08440.48560.75100.031*
N10.7519 (4)0.2059 (2)0.6780 (2)0.0182 (4)
H1A0.57790.28980.70090.027*
H1B0.71640.10610.63660.027*
H1C0.88820.25420.60110.027*
C10.9351 (5)0.3140 (3)0.9069 (3)0.0189 (4)
H1E0.74930.40850.92900.023*
H1F1.00040.27651.01460.023*
C20.8719 (5)0.1527 (3)0.8344 (3)0.0182 (4)
H2A1.05900.05960.80980.022*
H2B0.72450.09880.91740.022*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
I10.01634 (8)0.01767 (8)0.01768 (8)−0.00360 (5)−0.00336 (5)0.00129 (5)
O10.0182 (7)0.0167 (7)0.0249 (8)−0.0035 (6)−0.0021 (6)0.0012 (6)
N10.0164 (9)0.0213 (9)0.0175 (9)−0.0048 (7)−0.0027 (7)−0.0022 (7)
C10.0218 (11)0.0203 (11)0.0139 (10)−0.0046 (8)−0.0020 (8)0.0000 (8)
C20.0188 (10)0.0176 (11)0.0182 (10)−0.0023 (8)−0.0058 (8)0.0018 (8)
O1—C11.425 (3)C1—C21.505 (3)
O1—H1D0.8400C1—H1E0.9900
N1—C21.490 (3)C1—H1F0.9900
N1—H1A0.9100C2—H2A0.9900
N1—H1B0.9100C2—H2B0.9900
N1—H1C0.9100
C1—O1—H1D109.5O1—C1—H1F109.5
C2—N1—H1A109.5C2—C1—H1F109.5
C2—N1—H1B109.5H1E—C1—H1F108.0
H1A—N1—H1B109.5N1—C2—C1111.23 (16)
C2—N1—H1C109.5N1—C2—H2A109.4
H1A—N1—H1C109.5C1—C2—H2A109.4
H1B—N1—H1C109.5N1—C2—H2B109.4
O1—C1—C2110.92 (17)C1—C2—H2B109.4
O1—C1—H1E109.5H2A—C2—H2B108.0
C2—C1—H1E109.5
O1—C1—C2—N1−63.2 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O1i0.911.932.800 (2)158
N1—H1B···I1ii0.912.753.5825 (18)152
N1—H1C···I1iii0.912.783.6322 (18)155
O1—H1D···I10.842.723.5100 (15)157
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯O1i 0.911.932.800 (2)158
N1—H1B⋯I1ii 0.912.753.5825 (18)152
N1—H1C⋯I1iii 0.912.783.6322 (18)155
O1—H1D⋯I10.842.723.5100 (15)157

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

  2 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  WebCSD: the online portal to the Cambridge Structural Database.

Authors:  Ian R Thomas; Ian J Bruno; Jason C Cole; Clare F Macrae; Elna Pidcock; Peter A Wood
Journal:  J Appl Crystallogr       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 3.304

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.