Literature DB >> 24939995

Estimating tempo and mode of Y chromosome turnover: explaining Y chromosome loss with the fragile Y hypothesis.

Heath Blackmon1, Jeffery P Demuth2.   

Abstract

Chromosomal sex determination is phylogenetically widespread, having arisen independently in many lineages. Decades of theoretical work provide predictions about sex chromosome differentiation that are well supported by observations in both XY and ZW systems. However, the phylogenetic scope of previous work gives us a limited understanding of the pace of sex chromosome gain and loss and why Y or W chromosomes are more often lost in some lineages than others, creating XO or ZO systems. To gain phylogenetic breadth we therefore assembled a database of 4724 beetle species' karyotypes and found substantial variation in sex chromosome systems. We used the data to estimate rates of Y chromosome gain and loss across a phylogeny of 1126 taxa estimated from seven genes. Contrary to our initial expectations, we find that highly degenerated Y chromosomes of many members of the suborder Polyphaga are rarely lost, and that cases of Y chromosome loss are strongly associated with chiasmatic segregation during male meiosis. We propose the "fragile Y" hypothesis, that recurrent selection to reduce recombination between the X and Y chromosome leads to the evolution of a small pseudoautosomal region (PAR), which, in taxa that require XY chiasmata for proper segregation during meiosis, increases the probability of aneuploid gamete production, with Y chromosome loss. This hypothesis predicts that taxa that evolve achiasmatic segregation during male meiosis will rarely lose the Y chromosome. We discuss data from mammals, which are consistent with our prediction.
Copyright © 2014 by the Genetics Society of America.

Keywords:  Coleoptera; Karyotype; comparative methods; genetics of sex; sex chromosome

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24939995      PMCID: PMC4063915          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.114.164269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  75 in total

1.  Multiple independent evolutionary losses of XY pairing at meiosis in the grey voles.

Authors:  Pavel M Borodin; Ekaterina A Basheva; Anna A Torgasheva; Olesya A Dashkevich; Fedor N Golenishchev; Irina V Kartavtseva; Kazuyuki Mekada; Beth L Dumont
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Does the speciation clock tick more slowly in the absence of heteromorphic sex chromosomes?

Authors:  Barret C Phillips; Suzanne Edmands
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 4.345

3.  Sparse supermatrices for phylogenetic inference: taxonomy, alignment, rogue taxa, and the phylogeny of living turtles.

Authors:  Robert C Thomson; H Bradley Shaffer
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 15.683

4.  Y chromosomes: born to be destroyed.

Authors:  Sigrid Steinemann; Manfred Steinemann
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.345

5.  RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models.

Authors:  Alexandros Stamatakis
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  TRIPLOID INTERSEXES IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Authors:  C B Bridges
Journal:  Science       Date:  1921-09-16       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  The evolution of sex chromosomes.

Authors:  B Charlesworth
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-03-01       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Sex chromosome evolution: platypus gene mapping suggests that part of the human X chromosome was originally autosomal.

Authors:  J M Watson; J A Spencer; A D Riggs; J A Graves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Reversal of an ancient sex chromosome to an autosome in Drosophila.

Authors:  Beatriz Vicoso; Doris Bachtrog
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-06-23       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Pruning rogue taxa improves phylogenetic accuracy: an efficient algorithm and webservice.

Authors:  Andre J Aberer; Denis Krompass; Alexandros Stamatakis
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 15.683

View more
  18 in total

1.  The genetics of sex: exploring differences.

Authors:  Michelle N Arbeitman; Artyom Kopp; Mark L Siegal; Mark Van Doren
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Sex Determination, Sex Chromosomes, and Karyotype Evolution in Insects.

Authors:  Heath Blackmon; Laura Ross; Doris Bachtrog
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 2.645

3.  Whole-genome analysis across 10 songbird families within Sylvioidea reveals a novel autosome-sex chromosome fusion.

Authors:  Hanna Sigeman; Suvi Ponnikas; Bengt Hansson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Fragile, unfaithful and persistent Ys-on how meiosis can shape sex chromosome evolution.

Authors:  Aurora Ruiz-Herrera; Paul D Waters
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 3.832

5.  High dynamism for neo-sex chromosomes: satellite DNAs reveal complex evolution in a grasshopper.

Authors:  Ana B S M Ferretti; Diogo Milani; Octavio M Palacios-Gimenez; Francisco J Ruiz-Ruano; Diogo C Cabral-de-Mello
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Tree of Sex: a database of sexual systems.

Authors: 
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 6.444

7.  Never settling down: frequent changes in sex chromosomes.

Authors:  Kevin H-C Wei; Daniel A Barbash
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Transitions in sex determination and sex chromosomes across vertebrate species.

Authors:  Matthew W Pennell; Judith E Mank; Catherine L Peichel
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 6.185

9.  The genetics of sex: exploring differences.

Authors:  Michelle N Arbeitman; Artyom Kopp; Mark L Siegal; Mark Van Doren
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  The X Chromosome of Hemipteran Insects: Conservation, Dosage Compensation and Sex-Biased Expression.

Authors:  Arka Pal; Beatriz Vicoso
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 3.416

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.