Literature DB >> 24938912

Decision making about medical interventions in the end-of-life care of people with intellectual disabilities: a national survey of the considerations and beliefs of GPs, ID physicians and care staff.

Nienke Bekkema1, Anke J E de Veer2, Annemieke M A Wagemans3, Cees M P M Hertogh4, Anneke L Francke5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This paper explores the personal beliefs and specific considerations of professionals regarding decisions about potentially burdensome medical interventions in the end-of-life care for people with intellectual disabilities (ID).
METHODS: A survey questionnaire covering decision making about potentially burdensome medical interventions was sent to nationally representative samples of 294 ID care staff-members, 273 ID physicians and 1000 GPs.
RESULTS: Professionals predominantly believed that considerations about quality of life are most important. Quality of life and wellbeing were also frequently considered in both decisions to start/continue an intervention and decisions to forgo/withdraw an intervention. Seventy percent believed that people with ID should always be informed about interventions, and 61% would respect a refusal by the person. The family's wishes were explicitly considered more often than the wishes of the person with ID.
CONCLUSION: Although respondents agree that the quality of life is highly important, the wishes of people with ID (especially of those with severe/profound ID) were often not considered in decisions about potentially burdensome medical interventions. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: To enhance the active involvement of people with ID in decision making we recommend that professionals integrate collaborative principles in decision making and make use of pictorial and easy reading resources.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision making; End-of-life care; Intellectual disabilities; Medical interventions

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24938912     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  4 in total

1.  Withholding treatment and intellectual disability: Second survey on end-of-life decisions in Switzerland.

Authors:  Monika T Wicki
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2016-06-06

2.  Stigma research in the field of intellectual disabilities: a scoping review on the perspective of care providers.

Authors:  Hannah A Pelleboer-Gunnink; Wietske M W J van Oorsouw; Jaap van Weeghel; Petri J C M Embregts
Journal:  Int J Dev Disabil       Date:  2019-07-25

3.  Developing research priorities for palliative care of people with intellectual disabilities in Europe: a consultation process using nominal group technique.

Authors:  I Tuffrey-Wijne; M Wicki; P Heslop; M McCarron; S Todd; D Oliver; A de Veer; G Ahlström; S Schäper; G Hynes; J O'Farrell; J Adler; F Riese; L Curfs
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.234

4.  Positive attitudes to advance care planning - a Norwegian general population survey.

Authors:  Trygve Johannes L Sævareid; Reidar Pedersen; Morten Magelssen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 2.655

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.