Literature DB >> 24938795

Incorporating carbon storage into the optimal management of forest insect pests: a case study of the southern pine beetle (Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmerman) in the New Jersey Pinelands.

Rebecca M Niemiec1, David A Lutz, Richard B Howarth.   

Abstract

Forest insect pest disturbance is increasing in certain areas of North America as many insect species, such as the southern pine beetle, expand their range due to a warming climate. Because insect pests are beginning to occupy forests that are managed for multiple uses and have not been managed for pests before, it is becoming increasingly important to determine how forests should be managed for pests when non-timber ecosystem services are considered in addition to traditional costs and revenues. One example of a service that is increasingly considered in forest management and that may affect forest pest management is carbon sequestration. This manuscript seeks to understand whether the incorporation of forest carbon sequestration into cost-benefit analysis of different forest pest management strategies affects the financially optimal strategy. We examine this question through a case study of the southern pine beetle (SPB) in a new area of SPB expansion, the New Jersey Pinelands National Reserve (NJPR). We utilize a forest ecology and economics model and include field data from the NJPR as well as outbreak probability statistics from previous years. We find under the majority of scenarios, incorporating forest carbon sequestration shifts the financially optimal SPB management strategy from preventative thinning toward no management or reactionary management in forest stands in New Jersey. These results contradict the current recommended treatment strategy for SPB and signify that the inclusion of multiple ecosystem services into a cost-benefit analysis may drastically alter which pest management strategy is economically optimal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24938795     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-014-0304-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  7 in total

Review 1.  Assessing the consequences of global change for forest disturbance from herbivores and pathogens.

Authors:  M P Ayres; M J Lombardero
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Do mountain pine beetle outbreaks change the probability of active crown fire in lodgepole pine forests? Comment.

Authors:  W Matt Jolly; Russell Parsons; J Morgan Varner; Bret W Butler; Kevin C Ryan; Corey L Gucker
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.499

3.  Predicting the economic impact of an invasive species on an ecosystem service.

Authors:  David C Cook; Matthew B Thomas; Saul A Cunningham; Denis L Anderson; Paul J De Barro
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.657

4.  Forest fuel reduction alters fire severity and long-term carbon storage in three Pacific Northwest ecosystems.

Authors:  Stephen R Mitchell; Mark E Harmon; Kari E B O'Connell
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.657

5.  Root biomass allocation in the world's upland forests.

Authors:  Michael A Cairns; Sandra Brown; Eileen H Helmer; Greg A Baumgardner
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Impact of minimum winter temperatures on the population dynamics of Dendroctonus frontalis.

Authors:  J Khai Tran; Tiina Ylioja; Ronald F Billings; Jacques Régnière; Matthew P Ayres
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.657

7.  Economic impacts of non-native forest insects in the continental United States.

Authors:  Juliann E Aukema; Brian Leung; Kent Kovacs; Corey Chivers; Kerry O Britton; Jeffrey Englin; Susan J Frankel; Robert G Haight; Thomas P Holmes; Andrew M Liebhold; Deborah G McCullough; Betsy Von Holle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.