Literature DB >> 24938689

Augmentation mastopexy: maximal reduction and stable implant coverage using four flaps.

Eduardo Melero Forcada1, Miguel Calderón Fernández, Jorge Vizán Aso, Israel Pena Iglesias.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A single-stage operation to correct ptotic and hypoplastic breasts would appear to be a very appealing option for both surgeons and patients. However, this procedure is the most often litigated in aesthetic surgery because of its frequent complications. Our goal in this article is to report our experience with a four-flap technique for implant coverage in maximum reduction mastopexy with prosthesis.
METHODS: From January 2011 to March 2013, a total of 41 patients with Regnault grade II or grade III ptosis with no hypertrophy underwent primary bilateral augmentation mastopexy. Our technique includes an inverted-T mastopexy and a thin, well-vascularized, inferior dermoglandular flap to cover the inferior pole of the implant. Retrospective data collection revealed a mean patient age of 37.5 years. Thirty-nine patients were treated with round cohesive silicone gel implants and two with anatomical cohesive gel implants. The mean implant volume was 280 cc and mean follow-up time was 14 months.
RESULTS: The following complications were observed in declining frequency: four suture dehiscences, two hematomas, one capsular contracture, one implant malposition, and one poor scarring. A satisfaction questionnaire revealed very high satisfaction in 23 patients (56.09 %), high satisfaction in 12 (29.26 %), moderate satisfaction in four (9.75 %), and low satisfaction in two (4.87 %).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated a low complication rate (21.9 %) and low reoperation rate (12.1 %) with our technique and make us confident in recommending this technique for grade II and grade III ptosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors at www.springer.com/00266 .

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24938689     DOI: 10.1007/s00266-014-0356-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg        ISSN: 0364-216X            Impact factor:   2.326


  3 in total

1.  A Comparison of 28 Published Augmentation/Mastopexy Techniques Using Photographic Measurements.

Authors:  Eric Swanson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-09-21

2.  Mastopexy with an Implant and the Making of a Horizontal Flap of the Upper Pedicle, Simulating an Internal Bra.

Authors:  Getulio Duarte Junior; Fábio Coelho Duarte; Andre Cervantes
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 2.708

3.  Mastopexy using de-epithelialised dermoglandular flaps: a case series for maximal volume conservation following breast implants removal.

Authors:  Umar Daraz Khan; Salma Naseem; Sadia Rafiq
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 4.981

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.