IMPORTANCE: Uveal melanoma is characterized by mutations in GNAQ and GNA11, resulting in mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway activation. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of selumetinib, a selective, non-adenosine triphosphate competitive inhibitor of MEK1 and MEK2, in uveal melanoma. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized, open-label, phase 2 clinical trial comparing selumetinib vs chemotherapy conducted from August 2010 through December 2013 among 120 patients with metastatic uveal melanoma at 15 academic oncology centers in the United States and Canada. INTERVENTIONS: One hundred one patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive selumetinib, 75 mg orally twice daily on a continual basis (n = 50), or chemotherapy (temozolomide, 150 mg/m2 orally daily for 5 of every 28 days, or dacarbazine, 1000 mg/m2 intravenously every 21 days [investigator choice]; n = 51) until disease progression, death, intolerable adverse effects, or withdrawal of consent. After primary outcome analysis, 19 patients were registered and 18 treated with selumetinib without randomization to complete the planned 120-patient enrollment. Patients in the chemotherapy group could receive selumetinib at the time of radiographic progression. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Progression-free survival, the primary end point, was assessed as of April 22, 2013. Additional end points, including overall survival, response rate, and safety/toxicity, were assessed as of December 31, 2013. RESULTS: Median progression-free survival among patients randomized to chemotherapy was 7 weeks (95% CI, 4.3-8.4 weeks; median treatment duration, 8 weeks; interquartile range [IQR], 4.3-16 weeks) and among those randomized to selumetinib was 15.9 weeks (95% CI, 8.4-21.1 weeks; median treatment duration, 16.1 weeks; IQR, 8.1-25.3 weeks) (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.30-0.71; P < .001). Median overall survival time was 9.1 months (95% CI, 6.1-11.1 months) with chemotherapy and 11.8 months (95% CI, 9.8-15.7 months) with selumetinib (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.41-1.06; P = .09). No objective responses were observed with chemotherapy. Forty-nine percent of patients treated with selumetinib achieved tumor regression, with 14% achieving an objective radiographic response to therapy. Treatment-related adverse events were observed in 97% of patients treated with selumetinib, with 37% requiring at least 1 dose reduction. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this hypothesis-generating study of patients with advanced uveal melanoma, selumetinib compared with chemotherapy resulted in a modestly improved progression-free survival and response rate; however, no improvement in overall survival was observed. Improvement in clinical outcomes was accompanied by a high rate of adverse events. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01143402.
IMPORTANCE: Uveal melanoma is characterized by mutations in GNAQ and GNA11, resulting in mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway activation. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of selumetinib, a selective, non-adenosine triphosphate competitive inhibitor of MEK1 and MEK2, in uveal melanoma. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized, open-label, phase 2 clinical trial comparing selumetinib vs chemotherapy conducted from August 2010 through December 2013 among 120 patients with metastatic uveal melanoma at 15 academic oncology centers in the United States and Canada. INTERVENTIONS: One hundred one patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive selumetinib, 75 mg orally twice daily on a continual basis (n = 50), or chemotherapy (temozolomide, 150 mg/m2 orally daily for 5 of every 28 days, or dacarbazine, 1000 mg/m2 intravenously every 21 days [investigator choice]; n = 51) until disease progression, death, intolerable adverse effects, or withdrawal of consent. After primary outcome analysis, 19 patients were registered and 18 treated with selumetinib without randomization to complete the planned 120-patient enrollment. Patients in the chemotherapy group could receive selumetinib at the time of radiographic progression. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Progression-free survival, the primary end point, was assessed as of April 22, 2013. Additional end points, including overall survival, response rate, and safety/toxicity, were assessed as of December 31, 2013. RESULTS: Median progression-free survival among patients randomized to chemotherapy was 7 weeks (95% CI, 4.3-8.4 weeks; median treatment duration, 8 weeks; interquartile range [IQR], 4.3-16 weeks) and among those randomized to selumetinib was 15.9 weeks (95% CI, 8.4-21.1 weeks; median treatment duration, 16.1 weeks; IQR, 8.1-25.3 weeks) (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.30-0.71; P < .001). Median overall survival time was 9.1 months (95% CI, 6.1-11.1 months) with chemotherapy and 11.8 months (95% CI, 9.8-15.7 months) with selumetinib (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.41-1.06; P = .09). No objective responses were observed with chemotherapy. Forty-nine percent of patients treated with selumetinib achieved tumor regression, with 14% achieving an objective radiographic response to therapy. Treatment-related adverse events were observed in 97% of patients treated with selumetinib, with 37% requiring at least 1 dose reduction. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this hypothesis-generating study of patients with advanced uveal melanoma, selumetinib compared with chemotherapy resulted in a modestly improved progression-free survival and response rate; however, no improvement in overall survival was observed. Improvement in clinical outcomes was accompanied by a high rate of adverse events. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01143402.
Authors: Udai Banerji; D Ross Camidge; Henk M W Verheul; Roshan Agarwal; Debashis Sarker; Stan B Kaye; Ingrid M E Desar; Johanna N H Timmer-Bonte; S Gail Eckhardt; Karl D Lewis; Kathryn H Brown; Mireille V Cantarini; Clive Morris; Sarah M A George; Paul D Smith; Carla M L van Herpen Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-02-23 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Catherine D Van Raamsdonk; Klaus G Griewank; Michelle B Crosby; Maria C Garrido; Swapna Vemula; Thomas Wiesner; Anna C Obenauf; Werner Wackernagel; Gary Green; Nancy Bouvier; M Mert Sozen; Gail Baimukanova; Ritu Roy; Adriana Heguy; Igor Dolgalev; Raya Khanin; Klaus Busam; Michael R Speicher; Joan O'Brien; Boris C Bastian Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-11-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Tammie C Yeh; Vivienne Marsh; Bryan A Bernat; Josh Ballard; Heidi Colwell; Ron J Evans; Janet Parry; Darin Smith; Barbara J Brandhuber; Stefan Gross; Allison Marlow; Brian Hurley; Joe Lyssikatos; Patrice A Lee; James D Winkler; Kevin Koch; Eli Wallace Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2007-03-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Dina Chelouche Lev; Maribelis Ruiz; Lisa Mills; Eric C McGary; Janet E Price; Menashe Bar-Eli Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Pasi A Jänne; Alice T Shaw; José Rodrigues Pereira; Gaëlle Jeannin; Johan Vansteenkiste; Carlos Barrios; Fabio Andre Franke; Lynda Grinsted; Victoria Zazulina; Paul Smith; Ian Smith; Lucio Crinò Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2012-11-28 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Catherine D Van Raamsdonk; Vladimir Bezrookove; Gary Green; Jürgen Bauer; Lona Gaugler; Joan M O'Brien; Elizabeth M Simpson; Gregory S Barsh; Boris C Bastian Journal: Nature Date: 2008-12-10 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Fernanda Faião-Flores; Michael F Emmons; Michael A Durante; Fumi Kinose; Biswarup Saha; Bin Fang; John M Koomen; Srikumar P Chellappan; Silvya Stuchi Maria-Engler; Uwe Rix; Jonathan D Licht; J William Harbour; Keiran S M Smalley Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2019-06-21 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Jason J Luke; Daniel J Olson; Jacob B Allred; Carrie A Strand; Riyue Bao; Yuanyuan Zha; Timothy Carll; Brian W Labadie; Bruno R Bastos; Marcus O Butler; David Hogg; Pamela N Munster; Gary K Schwartz Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2019-09-26 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Jasmine H Francis; Larissa A Habib; David H Abramson; Lawrence A Yannuzzi; Murk Heinemann; Mrinal M Gounder; Rachel N Grisham; Michael A Postow; Alexander N Shoushtari; Ping Chi; Neil H Segal; Rona Yaeger; Alan L Ho; Paul B Chapman; Federica Catalanotti Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2017-07-12 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Erin E Talbert; Jennifer Yang; Thomas A Mace; Matthew R Farren; Alton B Farris; Gregory S Young; Omar Elnaggar; Zheng Che; Cynthia D Timmers; Priyani Rajasekera; Jennifer M Maskarinec; Mark Bloomston; Tanios Bekaii-Saab; Denis C Guttridge; Gregory B Lesinski Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2016-11-03 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Jesse L Berry; Francis L Munier; Brenda L Gallie; Ashley Polski; Sona Shah; Carol L Shields; Dan S Gombos; Kathleen Ruchalski; Christina Stathopoulos; Rachana Shah; Rima Jubran; Jonathan W Kim; Prithvi Mruthyunjaya; Brian P Marr; Matthew W Wilson; Rachel C Brennan; Guillermo L Chantada; Murali M Chintagumpala; A Linn Murphree Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2021-02-23 Impact factor: 3.167