Yan Lin1, F Benjamin Zhan1. 1. From the Texas Center for Geographic Information Science, Department of Geography, Texas State University, San Marcos.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine how racial/ethnic disparities of cervical cancer mortality vary geographically and to identify factors contributing to the variation. METHODS: Using the population-weighted risk difference, the authors investigated geographic patterns of racial/ethnic disparities in cervical cancer mortality in Texas based on data from 1995 to 2008 georeferenced at the census tract level. In addition, we considered the impact of seven factors--stage at diagnosis, spatial access to health care, and five factors that were created from available demographic data: socioeconomic status (SES), the sociodemographic factor, the percentage of African Americans, the health insurance factor, and the behavioral factor--on racial/ethnic disparities in the analysis using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: SES, the sociodemographic factor, the percentage of African Americans, and racial/ethnic disparities in late-stage diagnosis in a census tract were independent predictors of a census tract's displaying significant racial/ethnic disparities in cervical cancer mortality. Compared with a census tract with the highest SES, a census tract with the lowest SES was more likely to have higher mortality rates in African Americans (odds ratio 4.19, confidence interval 2.18-8.07) or Hispanics (odds ratio 8.15, confidence interval 5.27-12.61) than non-Hispanic whites after adjusting for covariates. Health insurance expenditures also influenced racial/ethnic disparities in mortality, although this effect was attenuated after adjusting for covariates. Neither our calculated behavioral factor nor spatial analysis of access to health care explained racial/ethnic gaps in mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study could allow cervical cancer intervention programs to more clearly identify areas that would reduce disparities in cervical cancer outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: To examine how racial/ethnic disparities of cervical cancer mortality vary geographically and to identify factors contributing to the variation. METHODS: Using the population-weighted risk difference, the authors investigated geographic patterns of racial/ethnic disparities in cervical cancer mortality in Texas based on data from 1995 to 2008 georeferenced at the census tract level. In addition, we considered the impact of seven factors--stage at diagnosis, spatial access to health care, and five factors that were created from available demographic data: socioeconomic status (SES), the sociodemographic factor, the percentage of African Americans, the health insurance factor, and the behavioral factor--on racial/ethnic disparities in the analysis using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: SES, the sociodemographic factor, the percentage of African Americans, and racial/ethnic disparities in late-stage diagnosis in a census tract were independent predictors of a census tract's displaying significant racial/ethnic disparities in cervical cancer mortality. Compared with a census tract with the highest SES, a census tract with the lowest SES was more likely to have higher mortality rates in African Americans (odds ratio 4.19, confidence interval 2.18-8.07) or Hispanics (odds ratio 8.15, confidence interval 5.27-12.61) than non-Hispanic whites after adjusting for covariates. Health insurance expenditures also influenced racial/ethnic disparities in mortality, although this effect was attenuated after adjusting for covariates. Neither our calculated behavioral factor nor spatial analysis of access to health care explained racial/ethnic gaps in mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study could allow cervical cancer intervention programs to more clearly identify areas that would reduce disparities in cervical cancer outcomes.
Authors: Michelle S Wong; David T Grande; Nandita Mitra; Archana Radhakrishnan; Charles C Branas; Katelyn R Ward; Craig E Pollack Journal: Med Care Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Jennifer M Knight; Karen L Syrjala; Navneet S Majhail; Michael Martens; Jennifer Le-Rademacher; Brent R Logan; Stephanie J Lee; Paul B Jacobsen; William A Wood; Heather S L Jim; John R Wingard; Mary M Horowitz; Muneer H Abidi; Mingwei Fei; Laura Rawls; J Douglas Rizzo Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2016-08-23 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Krista S Pfaendler; Jenny Chang; Argyrios Ziogas; Robert E Bristow; Kristine R Penner Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Daisy Y Morales-Campos; Bertha E Flores; Erin Donovan; Suzanne Burdick; Deborah Parra-Medina; Jessica A Kahn Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-03-05 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: José Revilla-López; Andrea Anampa-Guzmán; Luis Casanova Marquez; Katrina Weeks; Suzanne Pollard; Adriel Olórtegui-Yzú; María Ruiz-Velazco; Alba Davila-Edquen; Daniel Castro-Dorer; Juan Wong-Barrenechea; Jossira Abad-Seminario; Pamela Gonzáles-Ramos; Fiorella Rivera-Sandoval; Carlos Carracedo-Gonzáles Journal: Infect Agent Cancer Date: 2019-11-29 Impact factor: 2.965