| Literature DB >> 24937684 |
Tong-Shuai Guo1, Jie Zhang2, Jian-Jun Mu3, Fu-Qiang Liu4, Zu-Yi Yuan5, Ke-Yu Ren6, Dan Wang7.
Abstract
Salt-sensitive individuals show earlier and more serious cardiac damage than nonsalt-sensitive ones. Some studies have suggested that microRNA-133a could reduce cardiac hypertrophy and myocardial fibrosis. The current study aims to investigate the different functions of high-salt intake on salt-sensitive (SS) rats and Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats and the involvement of microRNA-133a in these roles. After high-salt intervention, the left ventricular mass (LVW) and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) of the salt-sensitive high salt (SHS) group were obviously higher than those of the salt-sensitive low salt (SLS) group. However, the difference between the Sprague-Dawley high salt (DHS) group and the Sprague-Dawley low salt (DLS) group was not significant. Compared with SLS group, collagen I and connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) in the heart of SHS group were significantly higher, whereas no statistical difference was observed between the DHS group and the DLS group. Compared with low-salt diet, microRNA-133a in the heart of both strains were significantly decreased, but that in the SHS group decreased more significantly. These results suggest that high salt intervention could down-regulate the expression of myocardial microRNA-133a, which may be one of the mechanisms involved in myocardial fibrosis in salt-sensitive hypertension.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24937684 PMCID: PMC4100181 DOI: 10.3390/ijms150610794
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Systolic blood pressure (SBP) of rats before and after salt intervention. SLS (salt-sensitive low salt); SHS (salt-sensitive high salt); DLS (Sprague-Dawley low salt); DHS (Sprague-Dawley high salt). * p < 0.01 vs. SLS intervention; # p < 0.01 vs. DHS intervention; p < 0.01 vs. DLS intervention.
LVM and LVMI of the four groups after intervention.
| Group ( | Body Weight (g) | LVM (mg) | LVMI (mg/g) |
|---|---|---|---|
| SLS | 263.53 ± 14.36 | 755.11 ± 29.84 | 2.87 ± 0.11 |
| SHS | 290.45 ± 10.25 | 932.72 ± 53.97
| 3.21 ± 0.09
|
| DLS | 250.37 ± 23.04 | 749.84 ± 49.36 | 2.84 ± 0.11 |
| DHS | 265.83 ± 10.93 | 802.87 ± 59.73 | 2.96 ± 0.12 |
Abbreviations: LVM, left ventricular mass; LVMI, left ventricular mass index; SLS, salt-sensitive low salt; SHS, salt-sensitive high salt; DLS, Sprague-Dawley low salt; DHS, Sprague-Dawley low salt; * p < 0.01 vs. SLS.
Figure 2Micrographs of heart slices in the left ventricle of salt-sensitive (SS) rats and Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats. Masson’s staining was used for detection of collagen. The collagen I fibers are shown in blue. (A) Histologic slice of the left ventricle (LV) of SS rats received low-salt intake; (B) Histologic slice of the LV of SS rats received high-salt intake; (C) Histologic slice of the LV of SD rats that received low-salt intake; (D) Histologic slice of the LV of SD rats received high-salt intake. Arrows: the positive signal of collagen I fibers in myocardium.
Figure 3Changes in the expression of myocardial collagen I after high-salt intervention. (A) Changes in collagen volume fraction (CVF; %) in the four groups. * p < 0.01 vs. SLS; (B) Changes in mRNA for collagen I in the four groups. The mRNA expression was detected through real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and normalized to the DLS group. * p < 0.01 vs. SLS.
Figure 4Micrographs of heart slices in the left ventricle (LV) of SS rats and SD rats. The myocardial CTGF expression was detected through immunohistochemical methods. CTGF is shown in brown. (A) Histologic slice of the LV of SS rats that received low-salt intake; (B) Histologic slice of the LV of SS rats that received high-salt intake; (C) Histologic slice of the LV of SD rats that received low-salt intake; (D) Histologic slice of the LV of SD rats received high-salt intake. Arrows: the positive signal of CTGF in myocardium.
Figure 5Changes in the expression of myocardial CTGF after high-salt intervention. (A) Changes in mean optical density (MOD)for CTGF in the four groups.* p < 0.01 vs. SLS; (B) Changes in mRNA for CTGF in the four groups. The mRNA expression was detected through real-time PCR and normalized to the DLS group. * p < 0.01 vs. SLS.
Figure 6Changes in mRNA for microRNA-133a in the four groups. The mRNA expression was detected through real-time PCR and normalized to the DLS group. * p < 0.01 vs. SHS; p < 0.05 vs. DHS; # p < 0.01 vs. DHS.