Literature DB >> 24937019

Conducting qualitative research within Clinical Trials Units: avoiding potential pitfalls.

Cindy Cooper1, Alicia O'Cathain2, Danny Hind3, Joy Adamson4, Julia Lawton5, Wendy Baird6.   

Abstract

The value of using qualitative research within or alongside randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is becoming more widely accepted. Qualitative research may be conducted concurrently with pilot or full RCTs to understand the feasibility and acceptability of the interventions being tested, or to improve trial conduct. Clinical Trials Units (CTUs) in the United Kingdom (UK) manage large numbers of RCTs and, increasingly, manage the qualitative research or collaborate with qualitative researchers external to the CTU. CTUs are beginning to explicitly manage the process, for example, through the use of standard operating procedures for designing and implementing qualitative research with trials. We reviewed the experiences of two UK Clinical Research Collaboration (UKCRC) registered CTUs of conducting qualitative research concurrently with RCTs. Drawing on experiences gained from 15 studies, we identify the potential for the qualitative research to undermine the successful completion or scientific integrity of RCTs. We show that potential problems can arise from feedback of interim or final qualitative findings to members of the trial team or beyond, in particular reporting qualitative findings whilst the trial is on-going. The problems include: We make recommendations for improving the management of qualitative research within CTUs.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complex interventions; Qualitative research; Randomised controlled trial; Trial management

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24937019     DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  17 in total

1.  Passing the baton: Community-based ethnography to design a randomized clinical trial on the effectiveness of oral pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention among Black men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Jonathan Garcia; Paul W Colson; Caroline Parker; Jennifer S Hirsch
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  Patient-centered and efficacious advance care planning in cancer: Protocol and key design considerations for the PEACe-compare trial.

Authors:  Judith M Resick; Robert M Arnold; Rebecca L Sudore; David Farrell; Shane Belin; Andrew D Althouse; Betty Ferrell; Bernard J Hammes; Edward Chu; Douglas B White; Kimberly J Rak; Yael Schenker
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Implementing a structured education program for children with diabetes: lessons learnt from an integrated process evaluation.

Authors:  Mary Sawtell; Liz Jamieson; Meg Wiggins; Felicity Smith; Anne Ingold; Katrina Hargreaves; Meena Khatwa; Lucy Brooks; Rebecca Thompson; Deborah Christie
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2015-04-28

4.  What motivates participation in HIV cure trials? A call for real-time assessment to improve informed consent.

Authors:  Holly L Peay; Gail E Henderson
Journal:  J Virus Erad       Date:  2015-01-01

5.  Participants' Experiences of a Sexual Counseling Intervention During Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Nested Qualitative Study Within the CHARMS Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Maureen D'Eath; Molly Byrne; Patrick Murphy; Tiny Jaarsma; Jenny McSharry; Andrew W Murphy; Sally Doherty; Chris Noone; Dympna Casey
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 2.083

6.  Qualitative and mixed methods research in trials.

Authors:  Claire Snowdon
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Ethnographic methods for process evaluations of complex health behaviour interventions.

Authors:  Sarah Morgan-Trimmer; Fiona Wood
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 8.  Maximising the impact of qualitative research in feasibility studies for randomised controlled trials: guidance for researchers.

Authors:  Alicia O'Cathain; Pat Hoddinott; Simon Lewin; Kate J Thomas; Bridget Young; Joy Adamson; Yvonne Jfm Jansen; Nicola Mills; Graham Moore; Jenny L Donovan
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2015-09-07

9.  Increasing protocol suitability for clinical trials in sub-Saharan Africa: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Nerina Vischer; Constanze Pfeiffer; Jennifer Kealy; Christian Burri
Journal:  Glob Health Res Policy       Date:  2017-04-07

10.  Progression from external pilot to definitive randomised controlled trial: a methodological review of progression criteria reporting.

Authors:  Katie Mellor; Saskia Eddy; Nicholas Peckham; Christine M Bond; Michael J Campbell; Gillian A Lancaster; Lehana Thabane; Sandra M Eldridge; Susan J Dutton; Sally Hopewell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.