| Literature DB >> 24936505 |
Eun Sook Ko1, Jin Yong Sung2, Jung Hee Shin1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vigorous saline injection for viscous cystic thyroid nodules.Entities:
Keywords: Biopsy, fine-needle; Thyroid nodule; Ultrasonography, interventional
Year: 2014 PMID: 24936505 PMCID: PMC4058986 DOI: 10.14366/usg.13027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ultrasonography ISSN: 2288-5919
Figure 1.Schematic representation of how to effectively aspirate a viscous cystic thyroid nodule after saline injection.
The keys to this procedure are that the pressure applied to inject normal saline should be as strong as possible (in order to break up the gelatinous material) and that the needle should be rotated and stirred multidirectionally after saline instillation.
Clinical results of simple aspiration using saline injection in 18 patients with viscous cystic thyroid nodules
| Case no. | Sex | Age (yr) | Initial volume (mL) | Residual volume (mL) | Volume reduction rate (%) | Amount of injected saline (mL) | Amount of aspirated fluid (mL) | PEI | Proceduretime (min) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | F | 64 | 9.43 | 3.08 | 67.3 | 5 | 8 | No | 5 |
| 2 | F | 55 | 3.01 | 0.69 | 77.1 | 3 | 5 | No | 5 |
| 3 | M | 54 | 24.63 | 5.51 | 77.6 | 12 | 28 | No | 18 |
| 4 | F | 30 | 25.97 | 8.65 | 66.7 | 21 | 39 | No | 12 |
| 5 | M | 54 | 1.19 | 0.23 | 80.7 | 2 | 3 | No | 7 |
| 6 | F | 43 | 14.1 | 6.08 | 56.9 | 8 | 20 | Yes | 12 |
| 7 | F | 46 | 5.01 | 3.1 | 38.1 | 10 | 15 | Yes | 26 |
| 8 | F | 52 | 14.1 | 10 | 29.1 | 4 | 10 | Yes | 11 |
| 9 | F | 48 | 5.34 | 1.0 | 81.3 | 2 | 5 | Yes | 15 |
| 10 | F | 49 | 8.00 | 2.6 | 67.5 | 4 | 5 | Yes | 20 |
| 11 | F | 24 | 2.83 | 2.0 | 29.3 | 12 | 10 | Yes | 12 |
| 12 | F | 68 | 22.83 | 4.5 | 80.3 | 17 | 20 | Yes | 10 |
| 13 | F | 28 | 4.27 | 2.8 | 34.4 | 3 | 10 | Yes | 14 |
| 14 | M | 53 | 4.89 | 1.49 | 69.5 | 3 | 10 | Yes | 11 |
| 15 | F | 41 | 22.4 | 14.49 | 80.5 | 32 | 24 | Yes | 16 |
| 16 | F | 55 | 20.03 | 4.62 | 86.7 | 10 | 28 | Yes | 8 |
| 17 | F | 59 | 4.71 | 2.94 | 37.6 | 10 | 16 | No | 14 |
| 18 | F | 52 | 6.09 | 1.41 | 85.2 | 3 | 4 | No | 8 |
| Mean | 48.6 | 11.0 | 4.18 | 63.7 | 8.94 | 14.4 | 12.4 |
PEI, percutaneous ethanol injection.
Figure 2.A 30-year-old woman with neck discomfort.
Ultrasonograms (A, transverse; B, longitudinal view) show a 26-mL (maximum diameter, 5.3 cm) cystic nodule with septation in the left thyroid, which could not be aspirated because of the high viscosity of the internal content (arrows). After saline injection, viscous cystic materials were easily evacuated with a long centesis needle via a transisthmic approach (C). After the aspiration, the cystic component nearly collapsed, and an 8.6-mL residual solid portion (arrows) remained on ultrasonograms (D, transverse; E, longitudinal view).
Comparison of volume reduction rate between subsequent PEI group and no PEI group after aspiration
| PEI | No (n=7) | Yes (n=11) | P-value[ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial volume (mL) | 10.71±10.29 | 11.25±7.72 | 0.860 |
| After aspiration (mL) | 3.21±3.00 | 4.79±4.10 | 0.375 |
| Last examination (mL) | 1.65±2.03 | 1.86±2.79 | 0.571 |
| Volume reduction rate (after aspiration, %) | 69.49±15.02 | 54.35±21.49 | 0.246 |
| Volume reduction rate (last examination, %) | 69.75±32.65 | 83.02±13.33 | 0.343 |
PEI, percutaneous ethanol injection.
Mann-Whitney test.