Taeko Hayashi1, Shuhei Ueda2, Hiroki Tsuruta3, Hiroshige Kuwahara1, Ro Osawa2. 1. Research Development Division, Maruzen Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., 14703-10 Mukaihigashi-cho, Onomichi 722-0062, Japan. 2. Department of Bioresource Science, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Kobe University, 1-1 Rokko-dai, Nada-ku, Kobe, 657-8501 Japan. 3. Center for Applied Structural Science, Center for Collaborative Research and Technology Development, Kobe University, 1-1 Rokko-dai, Nada-ku, Kobe, 657-8501 Japan.
Abstract
Complexing of green tea catechins with food constituents and their hydrolysis by tannase-producing Lactobacillus plantarum strains, were investigated. Our observations indicated that 1) epigallocatechin gallate (EGCg) and other catechin galloyl esters bound with food ingredients (i.e., proteins) to form a complex that is likely to be unabsorbable through the intestinal wall, whereas most catechins not esterified with gallic acid (GA) remain in free form, not complexing with food ingredients; 2) tannase activity of L. plantarum is strain dependent, possibly grouped into those with high tannase activity hydrolyzing EGCg to epigallocatechin and GA and those with the low activity; and 3) L. plantarum strains with high tannase activity are capable of hydrolyzing not only intact EGCg but also EGCg and other catechin galloyl esters complexed with dietary proteins to free non-galloyl ester catechins and GA. The evidence suggests that L. plantarum with high tannase activity, if it colonizes the human intestine, would release free non-galloyl-ester catechins and GA that are readily absorbed through the human intestinal epithelia from the complexes, thereby ensuring maximum delivery of the bioactive polyphenols of green tea to the host.
Complexing of green tea catechins with food constituents and their hydrolysis by tannase-producing Lactobacillus plantarum strains, were investigated. Our observations indicated that 1) epigallocatechin gallate (EGCg) and other catechin galloyl esters bound with food ingredients (i.e., proteins) to form a complex that is likely to be unabsorbable through the intestinal wall, whereas most catechins not esterified with gallic acid (GA) remain in free form, not complexing with food ingredients; 2) tannase activity of L. plantarum is strain dependent, possibly grouped into those with high tannase activity hydrolyzing EGCg to epigallocatechin and GA and those with the low activity; and 3) L. plantarum strains with high tannase activity are capable of hydrolyzing not only intact EGCg but also EGCg and other catechin galloyl esters complexed with dietary proteins to free non-galloyl estercatechins and GA. The evidence suggests that L. plantarum with high tannase activity, if it colonizes the human intestine, would release free non-galloyl-estercatechins and GA that are readily absorbed through the humanintestinal epithelia from the complexes, thereby ensuring maximum delivery of the bioactive polyphenols of green tea to the host.
Catechins contained in green tea, black tea, and wine are known to have strong
antioxidative and other potentially useful bioactivities [1]. Accumulating evidence indicates that these activities have notable effects
against so-called lifestyle-related diseases, including the suppression of carcinogenesis
through the “detoxification” of various oxygen-free radicals generated in the body [2], prevention of arterosclerosis by inhibiting the
oxidation of blood cholesterols [3] and improving
endothelial function [4], and regulation of blood
sugar concentration by affecting enzymatic activities related to glycogenesis [5]. Major green tea catechins include epigallocatechingallate (EGCg) and epicatechin gallate (ECg), which are esterified with gallic acid (GA),
such as hydrolysable tannins, and epigallocatechin (EGC) and epicatechin (EC), in which EGCg
is the most abundant [6]. Like other plant
polyphenols, catechins are known to bind to various proteins (e.g., albumin, casein) to form
macromolecular complexes in vitro [7, 8]. Furthermore, Carbonaro et al. [9] demonstrated through animal experiments that catechins bound with
proteins in the intestinal lumen, which may limit their absorption from the intestine.
Several human studies [10, 11] indicate that green tea catechins of the galloyl-ester form, EGCg and
ECg, were absorbed through the intestines markedly less than those of the non-galloyl ester
form, EGC and EC. The evidence suggests that the galloyl estercatechins in green tea are
more readily complexed with proteinous components of foods than non-estercatechins to form
stable macromolecules, thereby making them difficult to absorb through the host intestinal
wall.Over the past decade, we have isolated a range of Lactobacillus species,
including Lactobacillus plantarum, L. pentosus and L.
paraplantarum, capable of degrading tannin-protein complexes from human feces and
fermented vegetables that produce tannase (tannin acyl hydrolase [galloyl ester hydrolyzing
enzyme]) [12, 13]. Furthermore, we found that the optimal pH and temperature for the activity of
a tannase homologue cloned from a strain of L. plantarum were around pH7
and 40°C, respectively [14]. Since pH within the
human intestinal lumen ranges from slightly alkaline or acidic (i.e., 6.0-7.5) and the mean
total gastrointestinal transit time of ingested materials is approximately 30 hr in normal
human subjects [15], the macromolecules of
galloyl-estercatechins complexed with dietary proteins may be degraded by tannase produced
by lactobacilli colonizing the human intestine, thereby yielding smaller molecules of
non-galloyl-estercatechins that are absorbable through the human intestinal wall. In order
to evaluate this possibility, we herein describe: 1) complexing of green tea catechins with
food constituents, 2) hydrolysis of green tea catechin complex with food constituents by
tannase-producing lactobacillus strains and finally 3) degradation of green tea catechin
complex with food constituents by L. plantarum strains in vitro.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials
A standard laboratory rodent diet (MF; Oriental Yeast, Osaka, Japan) consisting of 54.4%
carbohydrate, 23.6% protein, and 5.3% fat (% total energy) was pulverized and dissolved in
50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) containing 1% ascorbic acid (Wako Chemical Industries,
Osaka, Japan) at final concentrations of 4%, 10% and 20% (wt/vol) with a shaking incubator
(200 rpm) at room temperature for 30 min to prepare a double strength stock solution of
rodent diet. Pure digestive enzymes including pepsin, porcine pancreatic lipase, trypsin
and chymotrypsin were obtained from Wako Pure Chemical Industries., Ltd. (Osaka,
Japan).Pure (-)-epigallocatechin gallate (EGCg), (-)-epigallocatechin (EGC) and
3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoic acid (gallic acid [GA]) obtained from Wako Pure Chemical
Industries, Ltd. were each dissolved in 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) containing 1%
ascorbic acid (Wako) at a final concentration of 0.5 mM or 1 mM as the respective stock
solutions. In addition to EGCg, EGC and GA, pure catechin galloyl esters including
(-)-gallocatechin gallate (GCg), (-)-epicatechin gallate (ECg) and (-)-catechin gallate
(Cg) and pure non-galloyl estercatechins including (-)-gallocatechin (GC), (+)-catechin
(C) and (-)-epicatechin (EC) were also obtained from Wako or Funakoshi Co., Ltd. (Tokyo,
Japan) and used as standard markers for subsequent HPLC analyses. The chemical structures
of the catechins and their galloyl esters as described above are presented in Figure 1 for reference.
Fig. 1.
Chemical structures of major green tea catechins and their galloyl esters. EGC,
epigallocatechin; EGCg, epigallocatechin gallate; EC, epicatechin; ECg, epicatechin
gallate; GC, gallocatechin; GCg, gallocatechin gallate; C, catechin; Cg, catechin
gallate
Chemical structures of major green tea catechins and their galloyl esters. EGC,
epigallocatechin; EGCg, epigallocatechin gallate; EC, epicatechin; ECg, epicatechingallate; GC, gallocatechin; GCg, gallocatechin gallate; C, catechin; Cg, catechingallateA commercial PET bottled green tea beverage (Kao Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) was purchased
from a local grocery store in Japan. Green tea was mixed with an equal volume of 100 mM
phosphate buffer (pH 6.8 [PBS]) containing 2% ascorbic acid (Wako), which is referred to
as “green tea solution” in the subsequent analyses.Meanwhile, 15 L. plantarum strains, including those isolated from
dietary fermented vegetables that were commercially available in Japan, were incubated in
MRS broth (Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, United Kingdom) aerobically at 37°C for 24hr. All
strains were positive for tannase activity, judging from a qualitative tannase assay
[16] using methyl gallate (Wako) as a substrate.
All strains possessed an L. plantarum-specific tannase gene as determined
by PCR assay, the procedure for which is described elsewhere [14]. After incubation, the bacterial cultures, collected by
centrifugation at 2,150 × g for 10 min, were washed well with PBS (pH 7.0) and then
suspended, with OD660 values of 1.0 (ca. 8.7 log colony forming units
[cfu]/ml), in 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) containing 1% ascorbic acid (Wako Pure
Chemical Industries, Ltd., Osaka, Japan) to prepare a “bacterial suspension” for
subsequent analyses.
HPLC analysis
Prior to HPLC analysis, all samples were filtered through a 10-kDa cut-off centrifugal
filter unit (Amicon Ultra-0.5; Millipore Corp., Bedford, USA) by centrifugation for 15 min
at 14,000g in order to collect fractions containing free EGCg, EGC, and GA. The filtrates
were then applied to a Shim-pack XR-ODS (3.0 mm i.d. × 50 mm, 2.2 µm particle size;
Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) using a Prominence Ultra Fast Liquid Chromatography
system (Shimadzu). Chromatograms were processed with an LC solution program (Shimadzu).
The separation solvents were 0.1% phosphoric acid (A) and 0.1% phosphoric acid /
acetonitrile 50:50 v/v (B). Separation was carried out at 37°C, according to the following
program: 01 min, isocratic of 5% B; 1–5 min, linear gradient of 5–20% B; 5–9 min, linear
gradient of 20–40% B; 9–10 min, linear gradient of 40–100% B; 1011 min, isocratic of 100%
B; and 11–15 min, isocratic of 5% B. The flow rate and injection volume were 1.0 mL/min
and 2 µL, respectively. Catechins and GA in eluates were detected by monitoring absorbance
at 230 nm and quantified by the means of the calibration curves obtained with respective
authentic standard markers of catechins and GA.
Food constituents complexing assay
For EGCg, EGC and GA, one milliliter of the reaction mixtures consisted of 0.5 mM each of
EGCg, EGC, or GA, 2, 5, and 10% wt/vol rodent diet, 1% wt/vol ascorbic acid, with or
without addition of 2% wt/vol pepsin, porcine pancreatic lipase, trypsin, or chymotrypsin
(Wako) in order to simulate human digesta. When green tea catechins were used, the mixture
consisted of 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.8), 50% vol/vol green tea solution, 2, 5 and 10%
wt/vol rodent diet and 1% wt/vol ascorbic acid, in which the final concentration of
commercial green tea was 25% vol/vol. The mixtures were incubated at 37°C for 3 min, 7
min, 15 min, 30 min, and 45 min, respectively. After incubation, they were subjected to
HPLC analysis as described above. Each assay was performed in triplicate.
Assay for green tea catechin hydrolysis by tannase-producing L. plantarum
strains
One milliliter of each bacterial suspension was transferred to an Eppendorf tube and
centrifuged at 14,000 g for 5 min. After centrifugation, the supernatant was removed,
leaving the bacterial cell pellets on the bottom of the tube. One milliliter of the
mixture consisting of 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.8), 0.475 mM EGCg, EGC or GA and 1%
wt/vol ascorbic acid was then added to the tube. The bacterial cell pellet was then
resuspended thoroughly with a vortex test-tube mixer for 30 sec. The prepared mixtures
were then incubated at 37°C for 10hr. After incubation, the mixtures were subjected to
HPLC analysis as described above. The same reaction without EGCg, EGC and GA was carried
out as a control. Each assay was performed in triplicate.As shown later, the EGCg hydrolyzing activity of the lactobacilli was strain dependent,
with some of the strains having high activity and others having low activity. Strain
L. plantarum 22A-4, which had high hydrolyzing activity, and strain
L. plantarum 20A-2, which had low activity were used for the subsequent
assay. One milliliter of the bacterial suspension of L. plantarum 22A-4
or 20A-2 was transferred to an Eppendorf tube and centrifuged at 14,000 g for 5 min. After
centrifugation, the supernatant was removed, leaving the bacterial cell pellets on the
bottom of the tube. Five hundred μl of PBS containing 1% ascorbic acid (Wako) was then
added to the tube, and the bacterial cell pellet was resuspended thoroughly by a vortex
test-tube mixer for 30 sec. Five hundred microliters of green tea solution was then added
to the tube and mixed by a vortex test-tube mixer for 30 sec. The prepared mixtures were
incubated at 37°C in a water bath for 10hr. After incubation, the mixtures were subjected
to HPLC analysis as described above. The green tea mixture without the bacterial cells was
manipulated as a control. Each assay was performed in triplicate.
Assay for hydrolysis of EGCg complexed with food constituents by tannase-producing L. plantarum strains
L. plantarum 22A-4 with high hydrolyzing activity and L.
plantarum 20A-2 with low activity were used for the subsequent assay. First, a
1-ml bacterial suspension of L. plantarum 22A-4 or 20A-2 was transferred
to 7 Eppendorf tubes and centrifuged at 14,000 g for 5 min. After centrifugation,
supernatants were removed, leaving the bacterial cell pellets on the bottom of the tubes.
To each respective pellet, one milliliter of the phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) containing 10%
wt/vol rodent diet, 0.5 mM EGCg, and 1% wt/vol ascorbic acid, which were preincubated at
37°C for 15 min, was added. The bacterial cell pellet was then immediately suspended
thoroughly in the mixtures with a vortex test-tube mixer for 30 sec. Immediately after
mixing, one of the mixtures was subjected to HPLC analysis, and the rest of the tubes
containing the mixtures were incubated at 37°C in a water bath for 1h, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10
hr. After each incubation, the mixtures were subjected to HPLC analysis as described
above. Each assay was performed in triplicate.
Hydrolysis assay of green tea catechins complexed with food constituents
Prior to the assay, the green tea solution was mixed with an equal volume of 50 mM
phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) containing 1% ascorbic acid (Wako). The mixture was subjected to
HPLC analysis in order to qualify and quantify the catechin contents in the mixture.
L. plantarum 22A-4 with high hydrolyzing activity and L.
plantarum 20A-2 with low activity were used for the subsequent assay. First, a
1-ml bacterial suspension of LP22A-4 or 20A-2 was transferred to 7 Eppendorf tubes and
centrifuged at 14,000 g for 5 min. After centrifugation, the supernatants were removed,
leaving the bacterial cell pellets on the bottom of the tubes. To the respective pellet,
one milliliter of the phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) containing 10% wt/vol rodent diet, 50%
vol/vol green tea solution and 1% wt/vol ascorbic acid, which were preincubated at 37°C
for 15 min, was added. The bacterial cell pellets were then resuspended thoroughly in the
mixtures with a vortex test-tube mixer for 30 sec. Immediately after mixing, one of the
mixtures was subjected to HPLC analysis, and the rest of the tubes containing the mixtures
were incubated at 37°C in a water bath for 10 hr. After incubation, the mixtures were
subjected to HPLC analysis as described above. Each assay was performed in triplicate.
RESULTS
Complexing of catechins with food constituents. A marked proportion of
pure EGCg was complexed with the food constituents within 3 min of incubation (Fig. 2a). The extent of complexing was dependent on the concentration of laboratory rodent
diet in the mixture, in which less than 50%, 30% and 20% of EGCg were detected as the free
form in the 2%, 5% and 10% diet mixtures, respectively. Similar diet concentration-dependent
complexing was observed for pure EGC (Fig. 2b),
but the extent of complexing was more moderate, with approximately 70% of EGC detected as
the free form even in the 10% diet mixture. The concentration of pure GA remained intact
regardless of the concentration of the diet in the mixtures throughout incubation (Fig. 2c). It should be noted that coincubation with
either pepsin, porcine pancreatic lipase, trypsin or chymotrypsin did not affect complexing
and the results were comparable to those without the digestive enzymes (data not shown).
Fig. 2.
Concentrations of free EGCg (a), EGC (b) and GA (c) in the mixture containing 0.5 mM
of pure (-)-epigallocatechin gallate, (-)-epigallocatechin, or gallic acid and 0% (○),
2% (□), 5% (▲) and 10% (×) of a standard laboratory rodent diet (wt/vol) detected by
HPLC during 45 min of incubation at 37°C.
Concentrations of free EGCg (a), EGC (b) and GA (c) in the mixture containing 0.5 mM
of pure (-)-epigallocatechin gallate, (-)-epigallocatechin, or gallic acid and 0% (○),
2% (□), 5% (▲) and 10% (×) of a standard laboratory rodent diet (wt/vol) detected by
HPLC during 45 min of incubation at 37°C.Figures 3a and 3b show the transition of the concentrations of EGCg and EGC detected as the free form
in the green tea-rodent diet mixture during incubation, respectively. Approximately 20% EGCg
was detected as the free form, while approx. 70% EGC was detected after 7 min incubation
with the diet mixture, and the ratio remained constant throughout the incubation. Figures 4a and 4b show a comparison of HPLC chromatograms between the commercial green tea mixed
equally with PBS only and green tea mixed equally with 20% of the diet suspension after 45
min incubation at 37°C. Peaks of not only EGCg but also other galloyl-estercatechins (i.e.,
GCg, ECg, Cg) were diminished markedly after incubation with the food suspension, whereas
more than half the contents of EGC and other non-galloyl estercatechins (i.e., GC, EC, C)
remained as the free form.
Fig. 3.
Concentrations of free EGCg (a) and EGC (b) in the mixture containing
quarter-strength commercial PET bottled green tea beverage and 0% (○), 2% (□), 5% (▲)
and 10% (×) of a standard laboratory rodent diet (wt/vol) detected by HPLC during 45
min of incubation at 37°C.
Fig. 4.
HPLC chromatograms of the mixture containing half-strength commercial green tea
mixed equally with PBS only (a) and with the solution of 20% (wt/vol) standard
laboratory rodent diet (b) after 45 min of incubation at 37°C. Peaks: 1, GC; 2, EGC;
3, C; 4, EC; 5, EGCg; 6, GCg; 7, ECg; and 8, Cg.
Concentrations of free EGCg (a) and EGC (b) in the mixture containing
quarter-strength commercial PET bottled green tea beverage and 0% (○), 2% (□), 5% (▲)
and 10% (×) of a standard laboratory rodent diet (wt/vol) detected by HPLC during 45
min of incubation at 37°C.HPLC chromatograms of the mixture containing half-strength commercial green tea
mixed equally with PBS only (a) and with the solution of 20% (wt/vol) standard
laboratory rodent diet (b) after 45 min of incubation at 37°C. Peaks: 1, GC; 2, EGC;
3, C; 4, EC; 5, EGCg; 6, GCg; 7, ECg; and 8, Cg.Hydrolysis of catechin galloyl esters by tannase-producing L. plantarum
strains. Of the 14 L. plantarum strains tested in the present
study, 8 strains hydrolyzed more than 80% of pure EGCg added in the test medium to EGC and
GA after 10 hr of incubation. The rest of the strains showed marginal hydrolyzing activity
(Fig. 5). It should be noted that EGC and GA added to the test media were not degraded by any
of the strains tested after 10 hr of incubation (data not shown). Strain 20A-2, which had
low hydrolyzing activity, showed limited hydrolyzing activity on catechin galloyl esters in
the green tea mixture, in which the chromatographic peak pattern (Fig. 6b) was almost comparable to that of the green tea mixture without addition of the
bacteria (Fig. 6a). By contrast, strain 22A-4,
which showed high EGCg hydrolyzing activity, hydrolyzed not only EGCg but also other
catechin galloyl esters (i.e., GCg, ECg, Cg) in the green tea mixture, yielding
non-galloyl-estercatechins (i.e., GC, EC, C) and GA after 10 hr of incubation at 37°C
(Fig. 6c). These results indicated that the
tannase of L. plantarum can hydrolyze not only EGCg but also other catechingalloyl esters to non-galloyl esters in green tea.
Fig. 5.
Concentrations of EGCg (solid bars), EGC (white bars), and GA (striped bars)
detected by HPLC in pure EGCg solutions incubated with 15 L.
plantarum strains (ca. 8.7 log cfu/ml) for 10 hr at 37°C. Concentration of
pure EGCg solution without the addition of bacterial cells at the start of the assay
(Blank, 0 hr) decreased slightly after 10 hr of incubation (Blank,10 hr) due to
auto-oxidation of EGCg.
Fig. 6.
HPLC chromatograms of half-strength commercial green tea mixed equally with PBS only
(a), half-strength commercial green tea mixed equally with PBS containing ca. 8.7 log
cfu L. plantarum 20A-2 (b) and half-strength commercial green tea
mixed equally with PBS containing ca. 8.7 log cfu L. plantarum 22A-4
(c) after 10 hr of incubation at 37°C. Peaks: 1, GC; 2, EGC; 3, C; 4,EC; 5, EGCg; 6,
GCg; 7, ECg; 8, Cg; and 9, GA.
Concentrations of EGCg (solid bars), EGC (white bars), and GA (striped bars)
detected by HPLC in pure EGCg solutions incubated with 15 L.
plantarum strains (ca. 8.7 log cfu/ml) for 10 hr at 37°C. Concentration of
pure EGCg solution without the addition of bacterial cells at the start of the assay
(Blank, 0 hr) decreased slightly after 10 hr of incubation (Blank,10 hr) due to
auto-oxidation of EGCg.HPLC chromatograms of half-strength commercial green tea mixed equally with PBS only
(a), half-strength commercial green tea mixed equally with PBS containing ca. 8.7 log
cfu L. plantarum 20A-2 (b) and half-strength commercial green tea
mixed equally with PBS containing ca. 8.7 log cfu L. plantarum 22A-4
(c) after 10 hr of incubation at 37°C. Peaks: 1, GC; 2, EGC; 3, C; 4,EC; 5, EGCg; 6,
GCg; 7, ECg; 8, Cg; and 9, GA.
Hydrolysis assay of catechin galloyl esters complexed with food constituents
Approximately 10% of the EGCg initially added was detected as the free form after 15 min
incubation in the 10% food suspension immediately before viable cells (ca. 5.0 ×
108 CFU/ ml) of strain 22A-4 with high tannase activity and strain 20A-2 with
low activity were added to the media. In the medium containing strain 22A-4, measurable
amounts of EGC and GA were detected after 4 hr of incubation, and the amounts increased
with time; after 10 hr of incubation, approximately 0.2 mM of EGC and GA in the free form
was detected, indicating that approximately 40% of the EGCg complexed with proteins in the
test medium was hydrolyzed to EGC and GA as the free form (Fig. 7a). However, little EGCg complexed with proteins in the test medium was hydrolyzed in
the media containing 20A-2 during incubation (Fig.
7b). Likewise, the concentrations of EGCg and other galloyl catechins of green
tea declined markedly on the HPLC graph after 15 min of incubation in 10% food suspension
immediately before viable cells of Lp 22A-4 with high tannase activity were suspended in
the media (data not shown). After 10 hr of incubation, the concentrations of EGC, EC and
GA detected by HPLC (Fig. 8c) were approximately 5- to 10-fold higher than those detected in the media incubated
with or without 20A-2 (Fig. 8b and Fig. 8a). The above observations provide evidence
supporting that L. plantarum strains with high tannase activity are
capable of hydrolyzing not only intact EGCg but also EGCg and other galloyl-estercatechins complexed with dietary proteins to free EGC and GA.
Fig. 7.
Concentration of free EGCg (○) in the mixture containing 10% of a standard
laboratory rodent diet (wt/vol) and concentrations of EGC(▲) and GA (□) detected by
HPLC after addition of ca. 8.7 log cfu L. plantarum 22A-4 (a) or
L. plantarum 20A-2 (b) during 10 hr of incubation at 37°C.
Fig. 8.
HPLC chromatograms for the mixture with 50% vol/vol commercial green tea mixed and
10% wt/vol of rodent diet (a), the mixture with addition of ca. 8.7 log cfu
L. plantarum 20A-2 (b) and the mixture with addition of ca. 8.7
log cfu L. plantarum 22A-4 (c) after 10 hr of incubation at 37°C.
Peaks: 1, GC; 2, EGC; 3, C; 4, EC; 5, EGCg; 6, GCg; and 7, GA.
Concentration of free EGCg (○) in the mixture containing 10% of a standard
laboratory rodent diet (wt/vol) and concentrations of EGC(▲) and GA (□) detected by
HPLC after addition of ca. 8.7 log cfu L. plantarum 22A-4 (a) or
L. plantarum 20A-2 (b) during 10 hr of incubation at 37°C.HPLC chromatograms for the mixture with 50% vol/vol commercial green tea mixed and
10% wt/vol of rodent diet (a), the mixture with addition of ca. 8.7 log cfu
L. plantarum 20A-2 (b) and the mixture with addition of ca. 8.7
log cfu L. plantarum 22A-4 (c) after 10 hr of incubation at 37°C.
Peaks: 1, GC; 2, EGC; 3, C; 4, EC; 5, EGCg; 6, GCg; and 7, GA.
DISCUSSION
Catechins complexing with food constituents have been demonstrated in several in vitro
experiments reported elsewhere [7, 8], in which catechins formed macromolecular complexes
with proteins (e.g., bovine serum albumin, casein), with EGCg forming the most stable
complexes. Since substances with a molecular weight of >10 kDa cannot cross normal
gastrointestinal mucosa [17] and free catechins
including EGCg and EGC were detected in the 10-kDa cut-off filtrate of the mixtures in the
present study, a large proportion of green tea catechin galloyl esters drunk by a human host
would complex with dietary proteins or proteinous substances secreted from the alimentary
tract (e.g., salivary proteins and mucins) to from macromolecules over 10 kDa, thereby not
being absorbed through the intestinal wall, whereas most EGC remains uncomplexed and is
readily absorbed through the alimentary epithelia. This might account for the markedly high
area under the blood concentration time curve for EGC and EC as compared with EGCg and ECg
in human volunteers consuming green tea, as observed by Henning et al. [10].Tannases of several fungal origins (e.g., Aspergilus oryzae, A. niger) are
currently being added to most commercial tea, wine and beer beverages in order to remove
undesirable haze or precipitates [18] that are
insoluble coacervates or condensation products composed of caffeine and tea flavonoids,
including catechins [19]. This treatment leads to
better color stability and organoleptic properties of green tea [20]. Although the safety of fungal tannase as a food additive has long
been confirmed [21, 22], L. plantarum tannase may be an alternative and even safer
additive, since the enzyme is produced by bacteria contained in the human diet that already
colonize humans [23]. In addition, the evidence
indicated that the tannase activity of L. plantarum is strain dependent,
with strains being grouped into those with high hydrolyzing activity and those having low
activity on EGCg. Similar strain-dependent tannase activity was reported previously when
methyl gallate was used as a substrate [12].Many previous in vitro experiments have demonstrated that galloylester catechins hold
stronger reactive oxygen scavenging activities than non-galloyl estercatechins; the
scavenging activity of ECg is greater than that of Ec, and that of EGCg is greater than that
of EGC [24,25,26]. For example, EGCg showed scavenging
rates for •OH and O2• that were by approx. 2-folds higher
than those of EGC [26]. Correspondingly, higher
cancer preventive activities of EGCg than EGC have been reported in several in vitro
experiments [27,28,29]. EGCg showed higher growth
suppressing activity against human promyelocytic leukemia cells that was by nearly 2-fold
higher than that of EGC [29]. However, galloyl estercatechins have been known to have markedly poor bioavailability attributing to its low
absorption as compared with non-galloyl-estercatechins. For example, Henning et al. [10] reported that EGC and EC had nearly 10 and 4-fold
greater average areas under the plasma concentration–time curve than EGCg and ECg over 0–8
hr after a single consumption of green tea. More recently, Renouf et al. [30] reported in their human volunteer experiment that EGC
was the major catechin, appearing rapidly in the plasma after green tea consumption, and
showed an approx. 5-6 folds higher concentration than EGCg. The evidence suggests that the
high absorbalility of non-galloyl-estercatechins would well compensate for their relatively
low bioreactivities. This in turn suggests that conversion of the galloyl estercatechins to
non-galloyl estercatechinscatechins via L. plantarum delivers green tea’s health promoting
effects more efficiently to the human body, since galloyl estercatechins comprised more
than 70% of total green tea catechins [6], most of
which will be complexed with proteins in digesta and the complex excreted intact in feces
otherwise.Recent in vitro experiments [31, 32] indicated that fungal tannase-treated green tea
inhibited the formation of carcinogenic and mutagenic N-nitrosamines in preserved meat due
to the higher cumulative antioxidant activity of non-galloyl estercatechin contents (e.g.,
EGC, EC, GA) in tannase-treated green tea compared with untreated tea. Furthermore,
non-galloyl estercatechins and GA were found to have marked antioxidant effects, which may
exert synergistically beneficial health effects to ameliorate metabolic diseases such as
diabetes mellitus [33]. In this context, the present
findings lead us to propose that a greater population of the L. plantarum
strain with high tannase activity would degrade macromolecular complexes of catechingalloyl
esters and dietary proteins to release more non-galloyl estercatechins and GA in the human
host intestine. These catechins and GA would then be readily absorbed through the intestinal
epithelia, thereby ensuring maximum delivery of the antioxidative properties of green tea to
the host. If this is the case, L. plantarum with high tannase activity
could be used as a novel probiotic to enhance the functionality of green tea. This probiotic
application is feasible, as the consumption of a fermented oatmeal drink containing a
probiotic strain of L. plantarum for 4 weeks achieved 8.2 log cfu/gram
feces in human volunteers [34]. Further studies are
in progress to evaluate such a probiotic potential of L. plantarum in
animal experiments, which will then be developed for human volunteer experiments.
Authors: D Goossens; D Jonkers; M Russel; E Stobberingh; A Van Den Bogaard; R StockbrUgger Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2003-09-01 Impact factor: 8.171