Literature DB >> 24935907

Maternal experiences of vaginal breech delivery.

Elli Toivonen1, Outi Palomäki, Heini Huhtala, Jukka Uotila.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal mode of breech birth remains controversial. In Finland, a trial of vaginal delivery is possible if strict selection criteria are met. As clinical practice in managing vaginal breech birth differs from that in normal delivery, the birth experience may also be different. This cohort study compares the childbirth experience between term breech and vertex deliveries.
METHODS: Intended vaginal term breech births from 2008 to October 2012 were included, and for every breech delivery, a vertex control was selected. The proportions of deliveries ending in a cesarean section and of mothers who had given birth vaginally before were equal in both groups. Three hundred eight mothers were sent the childbirth experience questionnaire and 170 returned it.
RESULTS: The birth experience does not differ between breech and vertex births, except for aspects with respect to the choice of birthing position. Indications of an even more positive experience were observed in the breech group, with the exception of the choice of analgesia, but these were not statistically significant. Primiparity, emergency cesarean section, infant birth trauma and prolonged hospital stay were identified as risk factors for a negative birth experience.
CONCLUSION: The birth experience of vaginal breech birth seems to be at least as positive as the vaginal vertex birth experience.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  birth experience; breech birth; trial of vaginal delivery

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24935907     DOI: 10.1111/birt.12119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  5 in total

Review 1.  Measuring women's childbirth experiences: a systematic review for identification and analysis of validated instruments.

Authors:  Helena Nilvér; Cecily Begley; Marie Berg
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Measuring women's experiences of decision-making and aspects of midwifery support: a confirmatory factor analysis of the revised Childbirth Experience Questionnaire.

Authors:  Anna Dencker; Liselotte Bergqvist; Marie Berg; Josephine T V Greenbrook; Christina Nilsson; Ingela Lundgren
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Validation of the Iranian version of the childbirth experience questionnaire 2.0.

Authors:  Solmaz Ghanbari-Homayi; Anna Dencker; Zahra Fardiazar; Mohammad Asghari Jafarabadi; Sakineh Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi; Shahla Meedya; Eesa Mohammadi; Mojgan Mirghafourvand
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  This baby is not for turning: Women's experiences of attempted external cephalic version.

Authors:  N P Watts; K Petrovska; A Bisits; C Catling; C S E Homer
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 5.  Women's experiences of breech birth decision making: An integrated review.

Authors:  Sara E Morris; Deborah Sundin; Sadie Geraghty
Journal:  Eur J Midwifery       Date:  2022-01-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.