| Literature DB >> 24935561 |
Georg Ferber1, Duolao Wang, Jörg Täubel.
Abstract
As ICH E14 was adopted by the US FDA and the EU CPMC in 2005, thorough QT studies have routinely been analyzed by looking at the time-matched difference between (baseline corrected) QTcF or QTcI under the supra-therapeutic dose and placebo. A study is considered negative, if the two-sided 90% confidence interval for this difference is below 10 ms for all investigated time points. ICH E14 suggests including a positive control, such as moxifloxacin, for assay sensitivity. Concentration-response analysis has been considered a more powerful alternative, but its application to parallel group studies was hampered as a double difference of QTcF per subject cannot be calculated. Recently, a new model based on change from baseline with fixed time and concentration effects has been proposed. It allows for a placebo-corrected prediction of the drug effect with an unbiased standard error, and the estimate of a time effect can be used for assay sensitivity. We demonstrate this approach, utilizing 2 studies reported elsewhere with a crossover design. We compare the results from a conventional concentration-response analysis based on the difference to placebo with results from the novel analysis based on the change from average baseline that includes a fixed time effect.Entities:
Keywords: QTc; assay sensitivity; concentration-response model; moxifloxacin; thorough QT study
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24935561 DOI: 10.1002/jcph.347
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Pharmacol ISSN: 0091-2700 Impact factor: 3.126