Literature DB >> 24935263

Recent progress on our understanding of the biological effects of mercury in fish and wildlife in the Canadian Arctic.

Anton Scheuhammer1, Birgit Braune2, Hing Man Chan3, Héloïse Frouin4, Anke Krey5, Robert Letcher1, Lisa Loseto6, Marie Noël7, Sonja Ostertag5, Peter Ross8, Mark Wayland9.   

Abstract

This review summarizes our current state of knowledge regarding the potential biological effects of mercury (Hg) exposure on fish and wildlife in the Canadian Arctic. Although Hg in most freshwater fish from northern Canada was not sufficiently elevated to be of concern, a few lakes in the Northwest Territories and Nunavut contained fish of certain species (e.g. northern pike, Arctic char) whose muscle Hg concentrations exceeded an estimated threshold range (0.5-1.0 μg g(-1) wet weight) within which adverse biological effects begin to occur. Marine fish species generally had substantially lower Hg concentrations than freshwater fish; but the Greenland shark, a long-lived predatory species, had mean muscle Hg concentrations exceeding the threshold range for possible effects on health or reproduction. An examination of recent egg Hg concentrations for marine birds from the Canadian Arctic indicated that mean Hg concentration in ivory gulls from Seymour Island fell within the threshold range associated with adverse effects on reproduction in birds. Mercury concentrations in brain tissue of beluga whales and polar bears were generally lower than levels associated with neurotoxicity in mammals, but were sometimes high enough to cause subtle neurochemical changes that can precede overt neurotoxicity. Harbour seals from western Hudson Bay had elevated mean liver Hg concentrations along with comparatively high muscle Hg concentrations indicating potential health effects from methylmercury (MeHg) exposure on this subpopulation. Because current information is generally insufficient to determine with confidence whether Hg exposure is impacting the health of specific fish or wildlife populations in the Canadian Arctic, biological effects studies should comprise a major focus of future Hg research in the Canadian Arctic. Additionally, studies on cellular interactions between Hg and selenium (Se) are required to better account for potential protective effects of Se on Hg toxicity, especially in large predatory Arctic fish, birds, and mammals. Crown
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biological effects; Canadian Arctic; Fish; Marine mammals; Mercury; Seabirds

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24935263     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.05.142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  10 in total

1.  Hg and Se exposure in brain tissues of striped dolphin (Stenella coeruleoalba) and bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) from the Tyrrhenian and Adriatic Seas.

Authors:  Antonio Bellante; Fabio D'Agostino; Anna Traina; Daniela Piazzese; Maria Francesca Milazzo; Mario Sprovieri
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 2.  The Mercury Problem in Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining.

Authors:  Louisa J Esdaile; Justin M Chalker
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 5.236

3.  Interactions between Environmental Contaminants and Gastrointestinal Parasites: Novel Insights from an Integrative Approach in a Marine Predator.

Authors:  Alice Carravieri; Sarah J Burthe; Camille de la Vega; Yoshinari Yonehara; Francis Daunt; Mark A Newell; Rachel M Jeffreys; Alan J Lawlor; Alexander Hunt; Richard F Shore; M Glória Pereira; Jonathan A Green
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Projected amplification of food web bioaccumulation of MeHg and PCBs under climate change in the Northeastern Pacific.

Authors:  Juan José Alava; Andrés M Cisneros-Montemayor; U Rashid Sumaila; William W L Cheung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Development of Cellulosic Paper-Based Test Strips for Mercury(II) Determination in Aqueous Solution.

Authors:  Shoujuan Wang; Zhen Xu; Yongyi Fang; Zhongming Liu; Xin Zhao; Guihua Yang; Fangong Kong
Journal:  J Anal Methods Chem       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 2.193

6.  A synthesis of patterns of environmental mercury inputs, exposure and effects in New York State.

Authors:  D C Evers; A K Sauer; D A Burns; N S Fisher; D C Bertok; E M Adams; M E H Burton; C T Driscoll
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 7.  Environmental and health risks posed to children by artisanal gold mining: A systematic review.

Authors:  Lao-Tzu Allan-Blitz; Charlotte Goldfine; Timothy B Erickson
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2022-02-09

8.  Total Mercury, Methylmercury, Inorganic Arsenic and Other Elements in Meat from Minke Whale (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) from the North East Atlantic Ocean.

Authors:  Amund Maage; Bente M Nilsen; Kaare Julshamn; Livar Frøyland; Stig Valdersnes
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 2.151

9.  Urine mercury levels correlate with DNA methylation of imprinting gene H19 in the sperm of reproductive-aged men.

Authors:  Zhaoxu Lu; Yufeng Ma; Linying Gao; Yingjun Li; Qiang Li; Mei Qiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Mercury in Ringed Seals (Pusa hispida) from the Canadian Arctic in Relation to Time and Climate Parameters.

Authors:  Magali Houde; Zofia E Taranu; Xiaowa Wang; Brent Young; P Gagnon; Steve H Ferguson; Michael Kwan; Derek C G Muir
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.742

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.